Suppr超能文献

长期暴露于交通噪声与死亡率:2000 年至 2020 年之间的流行病学证据的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Long-term exposure to traffic noise and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence between 2000 and 2020.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Deep Medicine Programme, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Deep Medicine Programme, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Environ Pollut. 2021 Jan 15;269:116222. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116222. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

Abstract

We aimed to update the evidence-base of long-term noise exposures from road, rail, and aircraft traffic on both non-accidental and cardiovascular mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The literature was searched using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE for the period between January 01, 2000 and October 05, 2020. 13 studies were selected for final review. The risk of bias and overall quality of evidence was evaluated using a pre-defined list of criteria. Risk estimates from each study were converted into per 10 dB higher of L for each traffic source. Inverse-Variance heterogeneity (I-Vhet) meta-analysis was used to pool these individual risk estimates, along with assessment of heterogeneity and publication bias. Sensitivity analyses include using random-effect model and leave-one-out meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses by study design and noise exposure assessment were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. For road traffic, the pooled relative risk (RR) per 10 dB higher L for mortality from non-accidental causes was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.05) (5 studies, I = 78%), CVD was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.05) (5 studies, I = 41%), ischemic heart disease (IHD) was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.08) (7 studies, I = 46%), and stroke was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.14) (5 studies, I = 62%). The overall quality of evidence for most meta-analyses was rated as very low to low, except for CVD or IHD mortality, for which the quality of evidence was rated as moderate. A possible threshold of 53 dB was visually suggested for CVD-related mortality from road traffic noise in the trend analysis. For aircraft noise, pooled estimates were based on fewer studies and varied by mortality outcomes. Evidence of long-term exposure to traffic noise on mortality remains weak except the association between road traffic noise and IHD mortality. High-quality longitudinal studies are required to better characterise mortality effects of traffic noise.

摘要

我们旨在更新道路、铁路和航空交通长期噪声暴露对非意外和心血管死亡率的证据基础。按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。使用 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 EMBASE 从 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 5 日期间搜索文献。选择了 13 项研究进行最终审查。使用预先确定的标准清单评估风险偏倚和证据的整体质量。将每项研究的风险估计值转换为每种交通源每增加 10 分贝的 L 值。使用逆方差异质性 (I-Vhet) 荟萃分析来汇总这些单独的风险估计值,并评估异质性和发表偏倚。敏感性分析包括使用随机效应模型和剔除一项荟萃分析。按研究设计和噪声暴露评估进行亚组分析,以探索异质性的潜在来源。对于道路交通,非意外原因导致的死亡率每增加 10 分贝 L 的汇总相对风险 (RR) 为 1.01(95%CI:0.98,1.05)(5 项研究,I = 78%),CVD 为 1.01(95%CI:0.98,1.05)(5 项研究,I = 41%),缺血性心脏病(IHD)为 1.03(95%CI:0.99,1.08)(7 项研究,I = 46%),中风为 1.05(95%CI:0.97,1.14)(5 项研究,I = 62%)。除 CVD 或 IHD 死亡率外,大多数荟萃分析的整体证据质量被评为极低至低,而 CVD 或 IHD 死亡率的证据质量被评为中度。趋势分析中,道路交通噪声与心血管疾病相关死亡率可能存在 53 分贝的阈值。对于飞机噪声,汇总估计值基于较少的研究,并且因死亡率结果而异。除了道路交通噪声与 IHD 死亡率之间的关联外,交通噪声对死亡率的长期影响证据仍然较弱。需要高质量的纵向研究来更好地描述交通噪声对死亡率的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验