Cramer Elena, Weber Franziska, Faro Gilian, Klein Michael, Willeke Dennis, Hering Thomas, Zietz Dörte
Department of Applied Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Hochschule für Gesundheit (University of Applied Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801 Bochum, Germany.
Rehabilitation Center for Neurology, Neurosurgery and Neuropaediatrics, VAMED Klinik Hattingen GmbH, Am Hagen 20, 45527 Hattingen, Germany.
Neurol Res Pract. 2020 Oct 1;2:27. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00078-w. eCollection 2020.
Postural control is a very important function in everyday life. However, assessing postural control with commonly used measurement instruments (MIs) is limited due to deficits in their psychometric properties. The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is a comprehensive and multidimensional MI for assessing postural control in persons with limited balance function, such as individuals after stroke. Despite the increasing use of the Mini-BESTest worldwide, no German version is available.
Is the German version of the Mini-BESTest (GVMBT) comprehensible and valid for measuring postural control in individuals after stroke?
The Mini-BESTest was translated and cross-culturally adapted, following established guidelines. It was pilot-tested with ten participants. This observational measurement and validation study was conducted at one point and included 50 participants with subacute and chronic stroke (mean age: 64.58 ± 13.34 years/ 34 men/ 16 women). Convergent validity was investigated using 1) the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and 2) the Timed "Up & Go" (TUG). The MIs were evaluated for normal distribution with the calculation of skewness, kurtosis and Q-Q-Plots. Spearman correlation coefficients and Bland Altman analysis were used to examine the relationship between the MIs. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.
Comprehension of the GVMBT was confirmed. The GVMBT correlated significantly with the BBS (r = 0.93) and the TUG (r = - 0.85). Bland Altman analysis revealed low absolute differences. The GVMBT demonstrated no significant floor or ceiling effects and showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's 0.90).
The GVMBT has excellent validity and internal consistency. Due to this and its specific subcategories, the GVMBT is recommended for the use in research and clinical practice. Further psychometric properties should be evaluated.
姿势控制在日常生活中是一项非常重要的功能。然而,由于常用测量工具(MIs)在心理测量特性方面存在缺陷,使用它们来评估姿势控制存在局限性。简易平衡评估系统测试(Mini-BESTest)是一种用于评估平衡功能受限人群(如中风后个体)姿势控制的综合多维度测量工具。尽管Mini-BESTest在全球范围内的使用越来越多,但尚无德语版本。
Mini-BESTest德语版(GVMBT)对于测量中风后个体的姿势控制是否易懂且有效?
按照既定指南对Mini-BESTest进行翻译和跨文化改编。对10名参与者进行了预试验。这项观察性测量和验证研究在某一时刻进行,纳入了50名亚急性和慢性中风患者(平均年龄:64.58±13.34岁/34名男性/16名女性)。使用1)伯格平衡量表(BBS)和2)定时起立行走测试(TUG)来研究收敛效度。通过计算偏度、峰度和Q-Q图来评估测量工具的正态分布情况。使用斯皮尔曼相关系数和布兰德-奥特曼分析来检验测量工具之间的关系。使用克朗巴赫α系数评估内部一致性。
证实了GVMBT的易懂性。GVMBT与BBS显著相关(r = 0.93),与TUG显著相关(r = -0.85)。布兰德-奥特曼分析显示绝对差异较小。GVMBT没有显著的地板效应或天花板效应,并且显示出极好的内部一致性(克朗巴赫α系数为0.90)。
GVMBT具有出色的效度和内部一致性。鉴于此及其特定的子类别,建议在研究和临床实践中使用GVMBT。应进一步评估其心理测量特性。