Hadjistavropoulos H D, Peynenburg V, Thiessen D L, Nugent M, Adlam K, Owens K M B, Karin E, Dear B F, Titov N
Department of Psychology, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
Internet Interv. 2020 Dec 1;22:100357. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100357. eCollection 2020 Dec.
With the growing demand for internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT), this pragmatic factorial (2 × 2 × 2) randomized controlled trial evaluated strategies for facilitating iCBT engagement and outcomes in routine care. Specifically, the benefits to patients and therapists of using homework reflection questionnaires and offering patients twice-weekly therapist support were examined. Patients ( = 632) accepted into iCBT for depression and/or anxiety were randomly assigned to complete homework reflection questionnaires or not (factor 1), receive once- or twice-weekly support (factor 2), and to receive care from therapists employed in one of two settings (iCBT clinic or a community mental health clinic; factor 3). Outcomes were measured at pre-treatment, and 8, 12, and 24-weeks post-enrollment. Therapist time was tracked and a focus group was conducted to examine therapist experiences. No differences in patient outcomes were found between therapists employed in the two settings; as such, these two groups were combined for further analyses. In terms of engagement, homework reflection questionnaires were associated with fewer website log-ins and days accessing iCBT; twice-weekly support was associated with more patient emails sent to therapists. Despite engagement differences, homework reflection questionnaires and twice-weekly support did not significantly impact primary outcomes; all groups showed large improvements in depression and anxiety that were maintained at 24-week follow-up. Therapists perceived a number of benefits and challenges associated with responding to homework reflection questionnaires and offering twice-weekly support; most notably the strategies did not benefit all patients. Twice-weekly support was associated with increased therapist time and organizational challenges. It is concluded that neither completion of homework questionnaires nor offering twice-weekly support significantly improve iCBT in routine care.
随着对互联网认知行为疗法(iCBT)需求的不断增长,这项实用的析因(2×2×2)随机对照试验评估了在常规护理中促进iCBT参与度和治疗效果的策略。具体而言,研究了使用家庭作业反思问卷以及为患者提供每周两次治疗师支持对患者和治疗师的益处。纳入iCBT治疗抑郁和/或焦虑的患者(n = 632)被随机分配,以决定是否完成家庭作业反思问卷(因素1)、接受每周一次或两次的支持(因素2),以及接受来自两种机构之一(iCBT诊所或社区心理健康诊所;因素3)的治疗师的护理。在治疗前、入组后8周、12周和24周测量治疗效果。记录治疗师的时间,并进行焦点小组讨论以考察治疗师的体验。在两种机构工作的治疗师所治疗的患者的治疗效果没有差异;因此,将这两组合并进行进一步分析。在参与度方面,家庭作业反思问卷与较少的网站登录次数和访问iCBT的天数相关;每周两次的支持与患者发送给治疗师的更多电子邮件相关。尽管存在参与度差异,但家庭作业反思问卷和每周两次的支持并未对主要治疗效果产生显著影响;所有组在抑郁和焦虑方面都有显著改善,并在24周随访时得以维持。治疗师认为在回应家庭作业反思问卷和提供每周两次的支持方面有一些益处和挑战;最显著的是这些策略并非对所有患者都有益。每周两次的支持与治疗师时间增加和组织方面的挑战相关。研究得出结论,在常规护理中,完成家庭作业问卷和提供每周两次的支持均未显著改善iCBT的治疗效果。