• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引导植物-病原体相互作用中的营养分化:毫无疑问是拮抗植物激素吗?

Directing Trophic Divergence in Plant-Pathogen Interactions: Antagonistic Phytohormones With NO Doubt?

作者信息

Huang Shuanglong, Zhang Xuehua, Fernando W G Dilantha

机构信息

Department of Plant Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 3;11:600063. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.600063. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2020.600063
PMID:33343601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7744310/
Abstract

A fundamental process culminating in the mechanisms of plant-pathogen interactions is the regulation of trophic divergence into biotrophic, hemibiotrophic, and necrotrophic interactions. Plant hormones, of almost all types, play significant roles in this regulatory apparatus. In plant-pathogen interactions, two classical mechanisms underlying hormone-dependent trophic divergence are long recognized. While salicylic acid dominates in the execution of host defense response against biotrophic and early-stage hemibiotrophic pathogens, jasmonic acid, and ethylene are key players facilitating host defense response against necrotrophic and later-stage hemibiotrophic pathogens. Evidence increasingly suggests that trophic divergence appears to be modulated by more complex signaling networks. Acting antagonistically or agonistically, other hormones such as auxins, cytokinins, abscisic acid, gibberellins, brassinosteroids, and strigolactones, as well as nitric oxide, are emerging candidates in the regulation of trophic divergence. In this review, the latest advances in the dynamic regulation of trophic divergence are summarized, emphasizing common and contrasting hormonal and nitric oxide signaling strategies deployed in plant-pathogen interactions.

摘要

植物与病原体相互作用机制的一个基本过程是营养分化调控,其最终导致生物营养型、半活体营养型和坏死营养型相互作用。几乎所有类型的植物激素在这一调控机制中都发挥着重要作用。在植物与病原体的相互作用中,激素依赖性营养分化的两个经典机制早已为人所知。水杨酸在宿主针对生物营养型和早期半活体营养型病原体的防御反应中起主导作用,而茉莉酸和乙烯则是促进宿主针对坏死营养型和后期半活体营养型病原体防御反应的关键因素。越来越多的证据表明,营养分化似乎受到更复杂的信号网络调控。生长素、细胞分裂素、脱落酸、赤霉素、油菜素内酯和独脚金内酯等其他激素,以及一氧化氮,通过拮抗或协同作用,正在成为营养分化调控中的新兴候选因素。在这篇综述中,总结了营养分化动态调控的最新进展,重点强调了植物与病原体相互作用中所采用的常见和不同的激素及一氧化氮信号策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f54/7744310/9820c30dc244/fpls-11-600063-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f54/7744310/9820c30dc244/fpls-11-600063-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f54/7744310/9820c30dc244/fpls-11-600063-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Directing Trophic Divergence in Plant-Pathogen Interactions: Antagonistic Phytohormones With NO Doubt?引导植物-病原体相互作用中的营养分化:毫无疑问是拮抗植物激素吗?
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 3;11:600063. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.600063. eCollection 2020.
2
Does the Latent Period of Leaf Fungal Pathogens Reflect Their Trophic Type? A Meta-Analysis of Biotrophs, Hemibiotrophs, and Necrotrophs.叶部真菌病原菌潜伏期中反映其营养类型吗?生物营养型、半生物营养型和死体营养型病原菌的荟萃分析。
Phytopathology. 2020 Feb;110(2):345-361. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-19-0144-R. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
3
Disease resistance or growth: the role of plant hormones in balancing immune responses and fitness costs.抗病性或生长:植物激素在平衡免疫反应和适应代价中的作用。
Front Plant Sci. 2013 May 24;4:155. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00155. eCollection 2013.
4
The common molecular players in plant hormone crosstalk and signaling.植物激素相互作用和信号传导中的常见分子参与者。
Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2015;16(5):369-88. doi: 10.2174/1389203716666150330141922.
5
Crosstalk among Jasmonate, Salicylate and Ethylene Signaling Pathways in Plant Disease and Immune Responses.茉莉酸、水杨酸和乙烯信号通路在植物病害与免疫反应中的相互作用
Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2015;16(5):450-61. doi: 10.2174/1389203716666150330141638.
6
Strigolactones and their crosstalk with other phytohormones.独脚金内酯及其与其他植物激素的相互作用。
Ann Bot. 2019 Nov 15;124(5):749-767. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz100.
7
The Janus face of reactive oxygen species in resistance and susceptibility of plants to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens.活性氧在植物对坏死亲和性病原菌抗性和易感性中的双面性。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012 Oct;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.01.014. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
8
Plant defense against virus diseases; growth hormones in highlights.植物对病毒病的防御;生长激素聚焦
Plant Signal Behav. 2019;14(6):1596719. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2019.1596719. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
9
Chickpea Roots Undergoing Colonisation by Exhibit Opposing Jasmonic Acid and Salicylic Acid Accumulation and Signalling Profiles to Leaf Hemibiotrophic Models.正在被 定殖的鹰嘴豆根表现出与叶半活体营养型模型相反的茉莉酸和水杨酸积累及信号传导模式。 (注:原文中“by”后面缺少具体内容)
Microorganisms. 2022 Feb 2;10(2):343. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020343.
10
Roles of Phytohormones and Their Signaling Pathways in Leaf Development and Stress Responses.植物激素及其信号通路在叶片发育和胁迫响应中的作用
J Agric Food Chem. 2021 Mar 31;69(12):3566-3584. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07908. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative meta-analysis of barely transcriptome: Pathogen type determines host preference.大麦转录组的比较荟萃分析:病原体类型决定宿主偏好。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 30;20(6):e0320708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320708. eCollection 2025.
2
Transcriptome analyses reveal as a potential candidate governing spot blotch resistance in wheat.转录组分析表明, 是小麦抗叶枯病的一个潜在候选基因。 (注:原文中“ reveal ”后缺少具体内容,这里根据常见语境补充了“ 是小麦抗叶枯病的一个潜在候选基因”,实际翻译时需根据完整准确的原文进行。)
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2025 Apr;31(4):591-608. doi: 10.1007/s12298-025-01583-5. Epub 2025 May 22.
3
Engineering tomato disease resistance by manipulating susceptibility genes.

本文引用的文献

1
Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of the Valine-Glutamine Motif-Containing Gene Family in and Functional Characterization of in Response to .泛素样蛋白家族基因的全基因组鉴定和分析及在响应中的功能特征
Phytopathology. 2021 Feb;111(2):281-292. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-20-0134-R. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
2
Abscisic acid influences the susceptibility of Arabidopsis thaliana to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and Peronospora parasitica.脱落酸影响拟南芥对番茄丁香假单胞菌和寄生霜霉的易感性。
Funct Plant Biol. 2003 May;30(4):461-469. doi: 10.1071/FP02231.
3
Brassinosteroids: Multidimensional Regulators of Plant Growth, Development, and Stress Responses.
通过操纵感病基因来构建番茄抗病性
Front Genome Ed. 2025 Feb 10;7:1537148. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2025.1537148. eCollection 2025.
4
From Recognition to Response: Resistance-Effector Gene Interactions in the and Patho-System.从识别到反应:植物与病原菌互作系统中的抗性-效应基因相互作用
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jan 27;14(3):390. doi: 10.3390/plants14030390.
5
Recent advances in nano-enabled immunomodulation for enhancing plant resilience against phytopathogens.用于增强植物对植物病原体抗性的纳米免疫调节的最新进展。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Aug 7;15:1445786. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1445786. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparative transcriptional analysis of Persea americana MYB, WRKY and AP2/ERF transcription factors following Phytophthora cinnamomi infection.番木瓜 MYB、WRKY 和 AP2/ERF 转录因子家族对肉桂疫霉感染的转录组比较分析。
Mol Plant Pathol. 2024 Apr;25(4):e13453. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13453.
7
The power of magnesium: unlocking the potential for increased yield, quality, and stress tolerance of horticultural crops.镁的力量:挖掘提高园艺作物产量、品质和抗逆性的潜力。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Oct 24;14:1285512. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1285512. eCollection 2023.
8
Herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid interferes with MAP kinase signaling in Fusarium graminearum and is inhibitory to fungal growth and pathogenesis.除草剂2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸干扰禾谷镰刀菌中的丝裂原活化蛋白激酶信号传导,并抑制真菌生长和致病作用。
Stress Biol. 2023 Aug 15;3(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s44154-023-00109-x.
9
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Novel Candidate Resistance Genes Involved in Defence against in Strawberry.比较转录组分析揭示了草莓防御中的新型候选抗性基因。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 29;24(13):10851. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310851.
10
Warming Scenarios and Infection in Chestnut ( Mill.).变暖情景与板栗(壳斗科栗属)感染
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jan 26;12(3):556. doi: 10.3390/plants12030556.
油菜素甾体:植物生长、发育和应激反应的多维调节剂。
Plant Cell. 2020 Feb;32(2):295-318. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00335. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
4
Manipulation of Phytohormone Pathways by Effectors of Filamentous Plant Pathogens.丝状植物病原体效应子对植物激素途径的操控
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jun 26;10:822. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00822. eCollection 2019.
5
Nitric oxide in plant-fungal interactions.植物-真菌相互作用中的一氧化氮。
J Exp Bot. 2019 Aug 29;70(17):4489-4503. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz289.
6
Strigolactones and their crosstalk with other phytohormones.独脚金内酯及其与其他植物激素的相互作用。
Ann Bot. 2019 Nov 15;124(5):749-767. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz100.
7
Signaling Crosstalk between Salicylic Acid and Ethylene/Jasmonate in Plant Defense: Do We Understand What They Are Whispering?水杨酸和乙烯/茉莉酸信号交叉对话在植物防御中的作用:我们是否理解它们在说什么?
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 4;20(3):671. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030671.
8
NPR1 paralogs of Arabidopsis and their role in salicylic acid perception.拟南芥 NPR1 同源蛋白及其在水杨酸感知中的作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 28;13(12):e0209835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209835. eCollection 2018.
9
Hormonal Responses to Infection in Cultivars Differing in Their Pathogen Resistance.感染病原菌后不同抗性品种的激素响应。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Dec 13;19(12):4024. doi: 10.3390/ijms19124024.
10
Antagonistic Regulation of ABA and GA in Metabolism and Signaling Pathways.脱落酸(ABA)与赤霉素(GA)在代谢及信号通路中的拮抗调控
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Feb 26;9:251. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00251. eCollection 2018.