Suppr超能文献

短视频分享平台上的视频作为结直肠息肉信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。

Videos in Short-Video Sharing Platforms as Sources of Information on Colorectal Polyps: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Wenchang People's Hospital, Wenchang, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 29;26:e51655. doi: 10.2196/51655.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Short videos have demonstrated huge potential in disseminating health information in recent years. However, to our knowledge, no study has examined information about colorectal polyps on short-video sharing platforms.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the content and quality of colorectal polyps-related videos on short-video sharing platforms.

METHODS

The terms "" (intestinal polyps) or "" (colonic polyps) or "" (rectal polyps) or "" (colorectal polyps) or "" (polyps of large intestine) were used to search in TikTok (ByteDance), WeChat (Tencent Holdings Limited), and Xiaohongshu (Xingyin Information Technology Limited) between May 26 and June 8, 2024, and then the top 100 videos for each search term on different platforms were included and recorded. The Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) score, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), the modified DISCERN, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) were used to evaluate the content and quality of selected videos by 2 independent researchers. SPSS (version 22.0; IBM Corp) and GraphPad Prism (version 9.0; Dotmatics) were used for analyzing the data. Descriptive statistics were generated, and the differences between groups were compared. Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between quantitative variables.

RESULTS

A total of 816 eligible videos were included for further analysis, which mainly conveyed disease-related knowledge (n=635, 77.8%). Most videos were uploaded by physicians (n=709, 86.9%). These videos had an average JAMA score of 2.0 (SD 0.6), GQS score of 2.5 (SD 0.8), modified DISCERN score of 2.5 (SD 0.8), understandability of 80.4% (SD 15.6%), and actionability of 42.2% (SD 36.1%). Videos uploaded by news agencies were of higher quality and received more likes and comments (all P<.05). The number of collections and shares of videos about posttreatment caveats were more than those for other content (P=.03 and P=.006). There was a positive correlation between the number of likes, comments, collections, and shares (all P<.001). The duration and the number of fans were positively correlated with the quality of videos (all P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There are numerous videos about colorectal polyps on short-video sharing platforms, but the reliability and quality of these videos are not good enough and need to be improved.

摘要

背景

近年来,短视频在传播健康信息方面显示出巨大的潜力。然而,据我们所知,尚无研究检查过短视频分享平台上有关结直肠息肉的信息。

目的

本研究旨在分析短视频分享平台上有关结直肠息肉的视频内容和质量。

方法

于 2024 年 5 月 26 日至 6 月 8 日期间,使用""(肠息肉)或""(结肠息肉)或""(直肠息肉)或""(结直肠息肉)或""(大肠息肉)等术语在短视频分享平台 TikTok(字节跳动)、微信(腾讯控股有限公司)和小红书(行吟信息科技有限公司)上进行搜索,然后纳入并记录每个平台上每个搜索词的前 100 个视频。由 2 名独立研究人员使用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)评分、全球质量量表(GQS)、改良 DISCERN 和患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)评估选定视频的内容和质量。使用 SPSS(版本 22.0;IBM 公司)和 GraphPad Prism(版本 9.0;Dotmatics)分析数据。生成描述性统计数据,并比较组间差异。采用 Spearman 相关性分析评估定量变量之间的关系。

结果

共纳入 816 条符合条件的视频进行进一步分析,主要传达疾病相关知识(n=635,77.8%)。大多数视频由医生上传(n=709,86.9%)。这些视频的 JAMA 评分为 2.0(SD 0.6),GQS 评分为 2.5(SD 0.8),改良 DISCERN 评分为 2.5(SD 0.8),可理解性为 80.4%(SD 15.6%),可操作性为 42.2%(SD 36.1%)。来自新闻机构的视频质量更高,获得的点赞和评论更多(均 P<.05)。有关治疗后注意事项的视频的收藏和分享数量多于其他内容(均 P=.03 和 P=.006)。点赞、评论、收藏和分享的数量之间存在正相关关系(均 P<.001)。视频的时长和粉丝数量与视频质量呈正相关(均 P<.05)。

结论

短视频分享平台上有大量关于结直肠息肉的视频,但这些视频的可靠性和质量还有待提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1086/11558218/21f707f2b59d/jmir_v26i1e51655_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验