Meroni Alice, Muirhead Roslyn P, Atkinson Fiona S, Fogelholm Mikael, Raben Anne, Brand-Miller Jennie C
School of Life and Environmental Sciences and Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Front Nutr. 2020 Dec 7;7:603801. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.603801. eCollection 2020.
High protein diets and low glycemic index (GI) diets have been associated with improved diet quality. We compared the changes in nutrient intakes of individuals at high risk of developing type-2 diabetes over 3 y who followed either a higher protein-lower GI diet (HPLG) or a conventional moderate protein-moderate GI diet (MPMG). This analysis included 161 participants with overweight and pre-diabetes from the Australian cohort of the PREVIEW study (clinical trial registered in https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01777893?term=NCT01777893&draw=2&rank=1) who were randomly assigned to a HPLG diet (25% energy from protein, dietary GI ≤ 50, = 85) or a MPMG diet (15% energy from protein, dietary GI ≥ 56, = 76). Food records were collected at 0-mo (baseline) and at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo (dietary intervention period). Linear mixed models were used to compare the differences in total energy, macro- and micronutrients, dietary GI, glycemic load (GL) and body weight between the two diet groups at the 4 dietary intervention time points. At 3 y, 74% participants from the HPLG diet and 74% participants from the MPMG diet completed the trial. The HPLG group showed significantly higher protein intake and lower dietary GI and GL than the MPMG group (group fixed effect < 0.001 for all three parameters). By 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo there was a 3.0, 2.7, 2.2, and 1.4% point difference in protein intake and 6.2, 4.1, 4.8, and 3.9 GI unit difference between the groups. The intake of energy and saturated fat decreased (mostly in the first 6-mo), while the intake of dietary fiber increased (from mo-0 to mo-12 only) in both diets, with no significant differences between the diets. The dietary intakes of zinc (group fixed effect = 0.05), selenium ( = 0.01), niacin ( = 0.01), vitamin B12 ( = 0.01) and dietary cholesterol (group by time fixed effect = 0.001) were higher in the HPLG group than in the MPMG group. Despite both diets being designed to be nutritionally complete, a HPLG diet was found to be more nutritious in relation to some micronutrients, but not cholesterol, than a MPMG diet.
高蛋白饮食和低血糖指数(GI)饮食与改善饮食质量有关。我们比较了有2型糖尿病高风险的个体在3年中遵循高蛋白-低血糖指数饮食(HPLG)或传统适度蛋白-适度血糖指数饮食(MPMG)后营养摄入量的变化。该分析纳入了来自PREVIEW研究澳大利亚队列的161名超重和糖尿病前期参与者(临床试验在https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01777893?term=NCT01777893&draw=2&rank=1注册),他们被随机分配到HPLG饮食组(蛋白质提供25%能量,饮食GI≤50,n = 85)或MPMG饮食组(蛋白质提供15%能量,饮食GI≥56,n = 76)。在0个月(基线)以及6、12、24和36个月(饮食干预期)收集食物记录。使用线性混合模型比较两个饮食组在4个饮食干预时间点的总能量、宏量和微量营养素、饮食GI、血糖负荷(GL)和体重的差异。3年后,HPLG饮食组74%的参与者和MPMG饮食组74%的参与者完成了试验。HPLG组的蛋白质摄入量显著高于MPMG组,饮食GI和GL则低于MPMG组(所有三个参数的组固定效应P<0.001)。到6、12、24和36个月时,两组之间的蛋白质摄入量差异分别为3.0、2.7、2.2和1.4个百分点,GI差异分别为6.2、4.1、4.8和3.9个单位。两种饮食中能量和饱和脂肪的摄入量均下降(主要在前6个月),而膳食纤维的摄入量增加(仅从0个月到12个月),两组之间无显著差异。HPLG组的锌(组固定效应P = 0.05)、硒(P = 0.)、烟酸(P = 0.01)、维生素B12(P = 0.01)和饮食胆固醇(组×时间固定效应P = 0.001)的饮食摄入量高于MPMG组。尽管两种饮食都设计为营养全面,但发现HPLG饮食在某些微量营养素方面比MPMG饮食更具营养,但在胆固醇方面并非如此。