Ridoutt Bradley G, Hendrie Gilly A, Noakes Manny
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Agriculture and Food, Victoria, Australia.
University of the Free State, Department of Agricultural Economics, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Adv Nutr. 2017 Nov 15;8(6):933-946. doi: 10.3945/an.117.016691. Print 2017 Nov.
The food system is a major source of environmental impact, and dietary change has been recommended as an important and necessary strategy to reduce this impact. However, assessing the environmental performance of diets is complex due to the many types of foods eaten and the diversity of agricultural production systems and local environmental settings. To assess the state of science and identify knowledge gaps, an integrative review of the broad topic of environment and diet was undertaken, with particular focus on the completeness of coverage of environmental concerns and the metrics used. Compared with the 14 discrete environmental areas of concern identified in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the located journal literature mainly addressed greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and, to a lesser extent, land and water use. Some relevant concerns were rarely addressed or not addressed at all. In the case of GHG emissions, changes in land use and soil carbon stocks were seldom considered. This represents a disconnect between the science informing strategic climate action in the agricultural sector and the science informing public health nutrition. In the case of land and water use, few studies used metrics that are appropriate in a life-cycle context. Some metrics produce inherently biased results, which misinform about environmental impact. The limited evidence generally points to recommended diets having lower environmental impacts than typical diets, although not in every case. This is largely explained by the overconsumption of food energy associated with average diets, which is also a major driver of obesity. A shared-knowledge framework is identified as being needed to guide future research on this topic. Until the evidence base becomes more complete, commentators on sustainable diets should not be quick to assume that a dietary strategy to reduce overall environmental impact can be readily defined or recommended.
食物系统是环境影响的主要来源,饮食改变被推荐为减少这种影响的一项重要且必要的策略。然而,由于所食用食物的种类繁多以及农业生产系统和当地环境状况的多样性,评估饮食的环境表现很复杂。为了评估科学现状并找出知识空白,我们对环境与饮食这一广泛主题进行了综合综述,特别关注环境问题的涵盖完整性以及所使用的指标。与联合国可持续发展目标中确定的14个不同的环境关注领域相比,所检索到的期刊文献主要涉及温室气体(GHG)排放,在较小程度上涉及土地和水资源利用。一些相关问题很少被提及或根本未被涉及。就温室气体排放而言,很少考虑土地利用和土壤碳储量的变化。这表明为农业部门的战略气候行动提供信息的科学与为公共卫生营养提供信息的科学之间存在脱节。就土地和水资源利用而言,很少有研究使用在生命周期背景下合适的指标。一些指标会产生固有偏差的结果,从而对环境影响提供错误信息。尽管并非在所有情况下都是如此,但有限的证据总体上表明,推荐的饮食比典型饮食对环境的影响更小。这在很大程度上可以由与平均饮食相关的食物能量过度消费来解释,而这也是肥胖的一个主要驱动因素。一个共享知识框架被认为是指导该主题未来研究所需的。在证据基础变得更加完整之前,可持续饮食的评论者不应急于假定可以轻易定义或推荐一种能减少总体环境影响的饮食策略。