Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌筛查中的人工智能:初级保健提供者的偏好

Artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening: primary care provider preferences.

作者信息

Hendrix Nathaniel, Hauber Brett, Lee Christoph I, Bansal Aasthaa, Veenstra David L

机构信息

The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington, USA.

RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jun 12;28(6):1117-1124. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa292.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being proposed for use in medicine, including breast cancer screening (BCS). Little is known, however, about referring primary care providers' (PCPs') preferences for this technology.

METHODS

We identified the most important attributes of AI BCS for ordering PCPs using qualitative interviews: sensitivity, specificity, radiologist involvement, understandability of AI decision-making, supporting evidence, and diversity of training data. We invited US-based PCPs to participate in an internet-based experiment designed to force participants to trade off among the attributes of hypothetical AI BCS products. Responses were analyzed with random parameters logit and latent class models to assess how different attributes affect the choice to recommend AI-enhanced screening.

RESULTS

Ninety-one PCPs participated. Sensitivity was most important, and most PCPs viewed radiologist participation in mammography interpretation as important. Other important attributes were specificity, understandability of AI decision-making, and diversity of data. We identified 3 classes of respondents: "Sensitivity First" (41%) found sensitivity to be more than twice as important as other attributes; "Against AI Autonomy" (24%) wanted radiologists to confirm every image; "Uncertain Trade-Offs" (35%) viewed most attributes as having similar importance. A majority (76%) accepted the use of AI in a "triage" role that would allow it to filter out likely negatives without radiologist confirmation.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Sensitivity was the most important attribute overall, but other key attributes should be addressed to produce clinically acceptable products. We also found that most PCPs accept the use of AI to make determinations about likely negative mammograms without radiologist confirmation.

摘要

背景

人工智能(AI)在医学领域的应用越来越广泛,包括乳腺癌筛查(BCS)。然而,对于初级保健提供者(PCP)对该技术的偏好了解甚少。

方法

我们通过定性访谈确定了AI BCS对PCP的最重要属性:敏感性、特异性、放射科医生的参与度、AI决策的可理解性、支持证据以及训练数据的多样性。我们邀请美国的PCP参与一项基于互联网的实验,该实验旨在迫使参与者在假设的AI BCS产品属性之间进行权衡。使用随机参数logit和潜在类别模型对回答进行分析,以评估不同属性如何影响推荐AI增强筛查的选择。

结果

91名PCP参与了实验。敏感性最为重要,大多数PCP认为放射科医生参与乳房X光检查解读很重要。其他重要属性包括特异性、AI决策的可理解性和数据的多样性。我们确定了3类受访者:“敏感性优先”(41%)认为敏感性比其他属性重要两倍以上;“反对AI自主性”(24%)希望放射科医生确认每一张图像;“不确定权衡”(35%)认为大多数属性具有相似的重要性。大多数(76%)接受AI在“分诊”角色中的使用,即允许其在无需放射科医生确认的情况下筛选出可能为阴性的结果。

结论与意义

总体而言,敏感性是最重要的属性,但其他关键属性也应得到解决,以生产出临床上可接受的产品。我们还发现,大多数PCP接受在无需放射科医生确认的情况下使用AI来判断乳房X光检查结果可能为阴性的情况。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
AI and Primary Care: Scoping Review.人工智能与初级保健:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 15;27:e65950. doi: 10.2196/65950.
7
Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: A Leadership Survey.放射学中的人工智能:一项领导力调查。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2025 May;22(5):577-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2025.01.006. Epub 2025 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

8
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening.国际乳腺癌筛查人工智能系统评估。
Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7788):89-94. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验