Suppr超能文献

[研究影响力与参与式健康研究:一场国际辩论]

[Research impact and participatory health research: an international debate].

作者信息

Allweiss Theresa, Cook Tina, Wright Michael T

机构信息

Institut für Soziale Gesundheit, Katholische Hochschule für Sozialwesen Berlin (KHSB), Köpenicker Allee 39-57, Berlin, 10318, Deutschland.

Faculty of Liberal Arts, Education and Social Sciences, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Taggart Avenue, Liverpool, L16 9JD, Vereinigtes Königreich.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):215-222. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03268-8. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

Abstract

In recent years, the academic world has been increasingly concerned with the social benefits of research and how they can be identified and demonstrated. Various discussions are being held on the impact of research, which are especially controversial in those countries where impact has become an important factor in the distribution of research funding. For participatory health research, a form of research that prioritises the engagement of those whose work or lives are the topic of the research, achieving social just impact outside the academic world is fundamental to its goal to reduce health inequalities.This article explores the questions of how research impact can be understood and collected and whether the impact of participatory health research can contribute to equal health opportunities. It addresses aspects of impact discussions in the United Kingdom and Germany exemplarily and presents the current state of the professional debate on the topic. Finally, it describes the drivers of participatory health research that can lead to a strengthening of equal health opportunities.The discussion of research impact allows for assessing and strengthening the sustainability and value of research, not only in the field of participatory health research. The diverse impacts of participatory health research have, however, the potential to reduce health inequalities and need to be recognised as such.

摘要

近年来,学术界越来越关注研究的社会效益以及如何识别和证明这些效益。关于研究影响的各种讨论正在进行,在那些影响已成为研究资金分配重要因素的国家,这些讨论尤其具有争议性。对于参与式健康研究(一种优先让那些工作或生活成为研究主题的人参与的研究形式)而言,在学术界之外实现社会公正影响是其减少健康不平等目标的根本所在。本文探讨了如何理解和收集研究影响以及参与式健康研究的影响是否能促进健康机会平等的问题。它以英国和德国为例阐述了影响讨论的各个方面,并呈现了该主题专业辩论的现状。最后,它描述了参与式健康研究中能够促进健康机会平等的驱动因素。对研究影响的讨论有助于评估和加强研究的可持续性和价值,这不仅适用于参与式健康研究领域。然而,参与式健康研究的多样影响有潜力减少健康不平等,需要得到认可。

相似文献

1
[Research impact and participatory health research: an international debate].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):215-222. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03268-8. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
2
[Participatory health research: origins and current trends].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):140-145. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03264-y. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
3
[Participatory research in Germany - quo vadis?].
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Apr;82(4):328-332. doi: 10.1055/a-1076-8078. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
[Funding conditions and framework conditions for participatory health research from a project's perspective].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):223-229. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03274-w. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
7
Framework for Participatory Quantitative Health Impact Assessment in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;17(20):7688. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207688.
8
Community-based Participatory Research Is Needed to Address Pulmonary Health Disparities.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1231-8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201601-054PS.
9
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
[Effects of citizen involvement and participation in knowledge processes of integrated municipal health promotion: a systematic scoping review].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Mar;68(3):323-335. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04013-9. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
4
Participatory Approaches in Family Health Promotion as an Opportunity for Health Behavior Change-A Rapid Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 16;19(14):8680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148680.

本文引用的文献

1
Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity-Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:177-199. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
2
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
3
Impact in Participatory Health Research.
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Oct 21;2018:3907127. doi: 10.1155/2018/3907127. eCollection 2018.
5
Social impact of participatory health research: collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization.
Educ Action Res. 2017;25(4):489-505. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2017.1329092. Epub 2017 May 25.
6
A conceptual framework for evaluating health equity promotion within community-based participatory research partnerships.
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Oct;70:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
Assessing the impact of healthcare research: A systematic review of methodological frameworks.
PLoS Med. 2017 Aug 9;14(8):e1002370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002370. eCollection 2017 Aug.
8
A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jul 19;14(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0126-z.
9
Research impact: a narrative review.
BMC Med. 2016 May 23;14:78. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0620-8.
10
A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Mar 18;13:18. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0003-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验