Suppr超能文献

[从项目视角看参与式健康研究的资助条件和框架条件]

[Funding conditions and framework conditions for participatory health research from a project's perspective].

作者信息

Bethmann Andreas, Behrisch Birgit, von Peter Sebastian

机构信息

Katholische Hochschule für Sozialwesen Berlin, Köpenicker Allee 39-57, 10318, Berlin, Deutschland.

Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):223-229. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03274-w. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

Abstract

Participatory Health Research is a unique research approach that needs unique funding conditions. In April 2020, the German journal Gesundheitswesen published an article that recommends reasonable measures for funding Participatory Health Research. Some of the aspects mentioned are illustrated in the present article with practical examples.Three examples of experiences are introduced to explain the manifold and different conditions for applying for funds for participatory research projects. Example 1 shows good cooperation between the applicant and funder, allowing participatory processes. The conditions for funding in example 2 - despite being focused on participatory involvement - did not allow effective participation. Example 3 deals with the personal, legitimate research interests of affected people, who are only partially reflected in the current funding landscape and hardly receive any funding.The experiences regarding the funding of participatory research are quite different. There are positive cases, however experiences in which applicants meet obstacles that hinder participative collaboration prevail. This particularly concerns the joint development of research tenders (issues, research questions, design) by all relevant stakeholders. Therefore, to effectively foster participatory health research, more calls for proposals are needed that are flexible, have prolonged application periods, allow multilevel funding, and are open to nonacademic stakeholders.

摘要

参与式健康研究是一种独特的研究方法,需要独特的资金条件。2020年4月,德国期刊《Gesundheitswesen》发表了一篇文章,推荐了为参与式健康研究提供资金的合理措施。本文通过实际例子说明了其中一些方面。介绍了三个经验实例,以解释参与式研究项目申请资金的多种不同条件。实例1展示了申请者与资助者之间良好的合作,允许参与式过程。实例2中的资助条件——尽管侧重于参与式参与——却不允许有效参与。实例3涉及受影响人群的个人合法研究利益,这些利益在当前的资金环境中仅得到部分体现,几乎没有获得任何资金。

参与式研究的资金资助经历差异很大。有积极的案例,但申请者遇到阻碍参与式合作的障碍的情况更为普遍。这尤其涉及所有相关利益攸关方对研究招标(问题、研究问题、设计)的联合制定。因此,为了有效促进参与式健康研究,需要更多灵活的、申请期限延长的、允许多层次资助的且对非学术利益攸关方开放的提案征集。

相似文献

1
[Funding conditions and framework conditions for participatory health research from a project's perspective].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):223-229. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03274-w. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
[Participatory research in Germany - quo vadis?].
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Apr;82(4):328-332. doi: 10.1055/a-1076-8078. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
[Continuing participatory research beyond the end of projects: participatory quality development in municipal health promotion].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03271-z. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
9
[Ethics in participatory research-reflection on challenges and possible impairments for participants].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):171-178. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03270-0. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
10
[What is participatory epidemiology? A definition].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Aug;62(8):1020-1023. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-02984-0.

引用本文的文献

2
[Evidence-based primary prevention and health promotion: methods and procedures in 5 research consortia].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 May;64(5):581-589. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03322-z. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

1
[Participatory research in Germany - quo vadis?].
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Apr;82(4):328-332. doi: 10.1055/a-1076-8078. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
2
Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence?
Fam Pract. 2008 Dec;25 Suppl 1:i20-4. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn055. Epub 2008 Sep 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验