• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Funding conditions and framework conditions for participatory health research from a project's perspective].[从项目视角看参与式健康研究的资助条件和框架条件]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):223-229. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03274-w. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
[Participatory research in Germany - quo vadis?].[德国的参与式研究——何去何从?]
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Apr;82(4):328-332. doi: 10.1055/a-1076-8078. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
3
Improving Treatment Together: a protocol for a multi-phase, community-based participatory, and co-design project to improve youth opioid treatment service experiences in British Columbia.共同改善治疗:一项多阶段、基于社区的参与式和共同设计项目的方案,旨在改善不列颠哥伦比亚省青年阿片类药物治疗服务体验。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Aug 14;16(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13722-021-00261-7.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Dark clouds in co-creation, and their silver linings practical challenges we faced in a participatory project in a resource-constrained community in India, and how we overcame (some of) them.共创中的乌云及其一线希望:我们在印度一个资源匮乏社区的参与式项目中面临的实际挑战,以及我们如何克服(其中一些)挑战。
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1421342. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1421342.
6
[Participatory research in the German Rheumatism League. Content implementation and practical realisation of participatory research in a patient organisation].[德国风湿病联盟的参与式研究。患者组织中参与式研究的内容实施与实际实现]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Sep;155:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
7
[Planning, Reflecting and Evaluating Participatory Health Research: Adaptation and Piloting of the "Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Model" for German-Speaking Countries].[参与式健康研究的规划、反思与评估:德语国家“基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)模式”的改编与试点]
Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Feb;86(2):111-117. doi: 10.1055/a-2167-2100. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
8
[Continuing participatory research beyond the end of projects: participatory quality development in municipal health promotion].[项目结束后仍持续开展的参与式研究:市政健康促进中的参与式质量发展]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03271-z. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
9
[Ethics in participatory research-reflection on challenges and possible impairments for participants].[参与式研究中的伦理——对参与者面临的挑战和可能的损害的反思]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):171-178. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03270-0. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
10
[What is participatory epidemiology? A definition].[什么是参与式流行病学?定义]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Aug;62(8):1020-1023. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-02984-0.

引用本文的文献

1
"What Do You Need? What Are You Experiencing?" Relationship Building and Power Dynamics in Participatory Research Projects: Critical Self-Reflections of Researchers.你需要什么?你正在经历什么?参与式研究项目中的关系构建和权力动态:研究人员的批判性自我反思。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9336. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159336.
2
[Evidence-based primary prevention and health promotion: methods and procedures in 5 research consortia].[基于证据的初级预防与健康促进:5个研究联盟的方法与程序]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 May;64(5):581-589. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03322-z. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

1
[Participatory research in Germany - quo vadis?].[德国的参与式研究——何去何从?]
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Apr;82(4):328-332. doi: 10.1055/a-1076-8078. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
2
Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence?让研究具有相关性:如果这是一种循证实践,那么基于实践的证据在哪里?
Fam Pract. 2008 Dec;25 Suppl 1:i20-4. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn055. Epub 2008 Sep 15.

[从项目视角看参与式健康研究的资助条件和框架条件]

[Funding conditions and framework conditions for participatory health research from a project's perspective].

作者信息

Bethmann Andreas, Behrisch Birgit, von Peter Sebastian

机构信息

Katholische Hochschule für Sozialwesen Berlin, Köpenicker Allee 39-57, 10318, Berlin, Deutschland.

Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):223-229. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03274-w. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-020-03274-w
PMID:33403462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7843531/
Abstract

Participatory Health Research is a unique research approach that needs unique funding conditions. In April 2020, the German journal Gesundheitswesen published an article that recommends reasonable measures for funding Participatory Health Research. Some of the aspects mentioned are illustrated in the present article with practical examples.Three examples of experiences are introduced to explain the manifold and different conditions for applying for funds for participatory research projects. Example 1 shows good cooperation between the applicant and funder, allowing participatory processes. The conditions for funding in example 2 - despite being focused on participatory involvement - did not allow effective participation. Example 3 deals with the personal, legitimate research interests of affected people, who are only partially reflected in the current funding landscape and hardly receive any funding.The experiences regarding the funding of participatory research are quite different. There are positive cases, however experiences in which applicants meet obstacles that hinder participative collaboration prevail. This particularly concerns the joint development of research tenders (issues, research questions, design) by all relevant stakeholders. Therefore, to effectively foster participatory health research, more calls for proposals are needed that are flexible, have prolonged application periods, allow multilevel funding, and are open to nonacademic stakeholders.

摘要

参与式健康研究是一种独特的研究方法,需要独特的资金条件。2020年4月,德国期刊《Gesundheitswesen》发表了一篇文章,推荐了为参与式健康研究提供资金的合理措施。本文通过实际例子说明了其中一些方面。介绍了三个经验实例,以解释参与式研究项目申请资金的多种不同条件。实例1展示了申请者与资助者之间良好的合作,允许参与式过程。实例2中的资助条件——尽管侧重于参与式参与——却不允许有效参与。实例3涉及受影响人群的个人合法研究利益,这些利益在当前的资金环境中仅得到部分体现,几乎没有获得任何资金。

参与式研究的资金资助经历差异很大。有积极的案例,但申请者遇到阻碍参与式合作的障碍的情况更为普遍。这尤其涉及所有相关利益攸关方对研究招标(问题、研究问题、设计)的联合制定。因此,为了有效促进参与式健康研究,需要更多灵活的、申请期限延长的、允许多层次资助的且对非学术利益攸关方开放的提案征集。