• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定参与者偏好的重要性:重要之事的重要性。

The Importance of Ascertaining Participant Preferences: The Importance of What Is Important.

作者信息

Degenholtz Howard B

机构信息

Health Policy and Management, Center for Bioethics and Health Law, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, USA.

出版信息

J Gerontol Soc Work. 2021 Jan-Feb;64(1):8-20. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2020.1864799. Epub 2021 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1080/01634372.2020.1864799
PMID:33390098
Abstract

Rosalie Kane made major contributions to research on ascertaining personal preferences. Her work influenced others and was part of a growing movement to place high priority on the voice and subjective experience of people who live with Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS). This essay summarizes some highlights of Rosalie's research, and traces the idea of incorporating participant preferences through different programs, policies and measurement tools over the past three decades. The current policy environment takes as paramount the notion that participants in LTSS programs should have an active role in planning their own care. While language supporting preferences is not new, the technology to effectively and efficiently elicit preferences is relatively recent. Key milestones in the development of these policies are reviewed. Rosalie's influence on generations of researchers and policy makers cannot be understated. She challenged colleagues, state program agencies and program directors to consider "the art of the possible," pushing them to explore how LTSS could fully support the dignity, independence and autonomy of every participant. A remaining challenge for researchers, policy makers and program managers is to move beyond incorporating preferences and choices as outcomes, and develop methods to accountably and reliably measure and incorporate individual goals of care into LTSS care plans. As LTSS continues to shift more and more into home and community-based settings, the quality of care and the quality of life for people who rely on those services will demand more subtle and individualized measures of processes and outcomes.

摘要

罗莎莉·凯恩在确定个人偏好的研究方面做出了重大贡献。她的工作影响了其他人,并且是日益壮大的运动的一部分,该运动高度重视长期服务与支持(LTSS)接受者的声音和主观体验。本文总结了罗莎莉研究的一些亮点,并追溯了在过去三十年中通过不同的项目、政策和测量工具纳入参与者偏好的理念。当前的政策环境将LTSS项目参与者应在规划自身护理中发挥积极作用这一观念置于首要位置。虽然支持偏好的表述并不新鲜,但有效且高效地引出偏好的技术相对较新。本文回顾了这些政策发展中的关键里程碑。罗莎莉对几代研究人员和政策制定者的影响不可低估。她向同事、州项目机构和项目主任提出挑战,要他们考虑“可能性的艺术”,促使他们探索LTSS如何能够充分支持每一位参与者的尊严、独立性和自主性。研究人员、政策制定者和项目管理者面临的一个尚存挑战是,要超越将偏好和选择作为结果纳入考量的范畴,开发出有责任且可靠地衡量并将个体护理目标纳入LTSS护理计划的方法。随着LTSS越来越多地转向居家和社区环境,依赖这些服务的人们所接受护理的质量以及生活质量将需要对过程和结果进行更细致且个性化的衡量。

相似文献

1
The Importance of Ascertaining Participant Preferences: The Importance of What Is Important.确定参与者偏好的重要性:重要之事的重要性。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2021 Jan-Feb;64(1):8-20. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2020.1864799. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
2
Rosalie Kane: A Career's Worth of "Evergreen" Insights.罗莎莉·凯恩:职业生涯中的“常青”见解
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2021 Jan-Feb;64(1):78-87. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2020.1864555. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports.提供以患者为中心的护理:长期服务和支持接受者的重要偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Feb;19(2):169-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
4
Care Arrangements of Older Adults: What They Prefer, What They Have, and Implications for Quality of Life.老年人的照料安排:他们的偏好、他们拥有的以及对生活质量的影响。
Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):845-855. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny127.
5
Long-term services and supports in the community: toward a research agenda.社区长期服务与支持:迈向研究议程。
Disabil Health J. 2015 Jan;8(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Maximizing Well-Being in the Context of Long-Term Services and Supports: A Q Methodological Approach.在长期服务和支持的背景下最大化幸福感:一种 Q 方法论方法。
Clin Gerontol. 2022 Oct-Dec;45(5):1155-1166. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2021.1899092. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
A Preference-Based Model of Care: An Integrative Theoretical Model of the Role of Preferences in Person-Centered Care.偏好导向型照护模式:以偏好为中心的个体照护角色的综合理论模型
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):376-384. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz075.
10
Mentoring Social Work PhD Students to Help Re-imagine Long-term Care.指导社会工作博士生,助力重塑长期护理模式。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2021 Jan-Feb;64(1):62-73. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2020.1864540. Epub 2021 Jan 6.