• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会知觉的价-域模型适用于哪些世界区域?

To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply?

机构信息

School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jan;5(1):159-169. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01007-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-020-01007-2
PMID:33398150
Abstract

Over the past 10 years, Oosterhof and Todorov's valence-dominance model has emerged as the most prominent account of how people evaluate faces on social dimensions. In this model, two dimensions (valence and dominance) underpin social judgements of faces. Because this model has primarily been developed and tested in Western regions, it is unclear whether these findings apply to other regions. We addressed this question by replicating Oosterhof and Todorov's methodology across 11 world regions, 41 countries and 11,570 participants. When we used Oosterhof and Todorov's original analysis strategy, the valence-dominance model generalized across regions. When we used an alternative methodology to allow for correlated dimensions, we observed much less generalization. Collectively, these results suggest that, while the valence-dominance model generalizes very well across regions when dimensions are forced to be orthogonal, regional differences are revealed when we use different extraction methods and correlate and rotate the dimension reduction solution. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 5 November 2018. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7611443.v1 .

摘要

在过去的 10 年中,Oosterhof 和 Todorov 的效价-优势模型已经成为解释人们如何在社会维度上评价面孔的最突出的理论。在这个模型中,两个维度(效价和优势)支撑着人们对面孔的社会判断。由于该模型主要在西方地区开发和测试,因此尚不清楚这些发现是否适用于其他地区。我们通过在 11 个世界地区、41 个国家和 11570 名参与者中复制 Oosterhof 和 Todorov 的方法来解决这个问题。当我们使用 Oosterhof 和 Todorov 的原始分析策略时,效价-优势模型在各个地区都得到了很好的概括。当我们使用另一种方法来允许相关维度时,我们观察到的概括程度要低得多。总的来说,这些结果表明,虽然效价-优势模型在维度被强制正交时可以很好地推广到各个地区,但当我们使用不同的提取方法并对降维解决方案进行相关和旋转时,就会揭示出地区差异。 方案注册:该注册报告的第 1 阶段方案于 2018 年 11 月 5 日原则上被接受。该方案已被期刊接受,可以在 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7611443.v1 找到。

相似文献

1
To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply?社会知觉的价-域模型适用于哪些世界区域?
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jan;5(1):159-169. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01007-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
2
The valence-dominance model applies to body perception.效价-优势模型适用于身体感知。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Sep 7;9(9):220594. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220594. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Social inferences from faces: ambient images generate a three-dimensional model.从面部推断社会信息:环境图像生成三维模型。
Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):105-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
4
Testing the functional basis of first impressions: Dimensions for children's faces are not the same as for adults' faces.测试第一印象的功能基础:儿童面部的维度与成人面部的维度不同。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Nov;117(5):900-924. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000167. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
5
A data-driven study of Chinese participants' social judgments of Chinese faces.基于数据的中国被试对中国人脸的社会判断研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):e0210315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210315. eCollection 2019.
6
Registered report: Social face evaluation: ethnicity-specific differences in the judgement of trustworthiness of faces and facial parts.注册报告:社会面孔评价:面孔和面部特征判断可信赖度的种族特异性差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 31;12(1):18311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22709-9.
7
Integrating social and facial models of person perception: Converging and diverging dimensions.整合人际知觉的社会与面部模型:趋同与分歧维度
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:257-267. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
Predicting the reward value of faces and bodies from social perception.从社会认知中预测面部和身体的奖励价值。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 19;12(9):e0185093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185093. eCollection 2017.
9
Task-invariant brain responses to the social value of faces.对人脸社会价值的任务不变的大脑反应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2766-81. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21616. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
10
The role of the amygdala in implicit evaluation of emotionally neutral faces.杏仁核在对情绪中性面孔的内隐评估中的作用。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008 Dec;3(4):303-12. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn033. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The asymmetry system properties of the visual system: Evidence from serial face processing.视觉系统的不对称系统属性:来自系列面孔加工的证据。
J Vis. 2025 Aug 1;25(10):12. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.10.12.
2
Digital pathways beyond Western-centric participants.以西方为中心的参与者之外的数字途径。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 18;57(8):229. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02751-x.
3
Network models reveal high-dimensional social inferences in naturalistic settings beyond latent construct models.网络模型揭示了超越潜在结构模型的自然环境中的高维社会推理。

本文引用的文献

1
The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network.心理科学加速器:通过分布式协作网络推动心理学发展。
Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;1(4):501-515. doi: 10.1177/2515245918797607. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
2
Economic status cues from clothes affect perceived competence from faces.衣着的经济地位线索会影响对面孔能力的感知。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Mar;4(3):287-293. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0782-4. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
3
Gender biases in impressions from faces: Empirical studies and computational models.
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 7;3(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00275-w.
4
The Israeli Face Database (IFD): A multi-ethnic database of faces with supporting social norming data.以色列人脸数据库(IFD):一个包含支持性社会规范数据的多民族人脸数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 13;57(7):197. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02723-1.
5
Validation of facial attributions in leadership: Trustworthiness and age in Chinese mid-level management.领导力中面部特征归因的验证:中国中层管理人员的可信度与年龄
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0324508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324508. eCollection 2025.
6
Face value: The effect of facial aesthetic treatment on first impressions and partner preferences.票面价值:面部美容治疗对第一印象和伴侣偏好的影响。
Perception. 2025 Sep;54(9):651-673. doi: 10.1177/03010066251337353. Epub 2025 May 26.
7
Gray hair influences perceived age and social perceptions.白发会影响人们对年龄的认知以及社会认知。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 7;16:1541836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1541836. eCollection 2025.
8
The Evolution of Aesthetic Medicine: Exploring the Intersection of Social Psychology, Technology, and Aesthetic Medicine.美容医学的演变:探索社会心理学、技术与美容医学的交叉领域。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2025 Mar 13;7:ojaf015. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojaf015. eCollection 2025.
9
Face evaluation: Findings, methods, and challenges.面部评估:研究结果、方法与挑战。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Mar;1545(1):28-37. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15293. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
10
Diversity perceptions and neighborhood preferences for visual representations of mixed racial groups.对混合种族群体视觉表现的多样性认知和邻里偏好。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 20;14(1):24631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76599-0.
面孔印象中的性别偏见:实证研究与计算模型。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Feb;149(2):323-342. doi: 10.1037/xge0000638. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
4
Testing the functional basis of first impressions: Dimensions for children's faces are not the same as for adults' faces.测试第一印象的功能基础:儿童面部的维度与成人面部的维度不同。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Nov;117(5):900-924. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000167. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
5
Do facial first impressions reflect a shared social reality?面部第一印象是否反映了共同的社会现实?
Br J Psychol. 2020 May;111(2):215-232. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12390. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
6
A data-driven study of Chinese participants' social judgments of Chinese faces.基于数据的中国被试对中国人脸的社会判断研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):e0210315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210315. eCollection 2019.
7
Perceiver and target characteristics contribute to impression formation differently across race and gender.感知者和目标的特征在跨种族和跨性别群体中对印象形成的影响不同。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Aug;117(2):364-385. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000160. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
8
The conceptual structure of face impressions.面部印象的概念结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9210-9215. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807222115. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
9
Variation is the universal: making cultural evolution work in developmental psychology.变异性是普遍存在的:在发展心理学中实现文化进化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 5;373(1743). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0059.
10
A Dynamic Structure of Social Trait Space.社会特质空间的动态结构。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Mar;22(3):197-200. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Jan 30.