School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jan;5(1):159-169. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01007-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
Over the past 10 years, Oosterhof and Todorov's valence-dominance model has emerged as the most prominent account of how people evaluate faces on social dimensions. In this model, two dimensions (valence and dominance) underpin social judgements of faces. Because this model has primarily been developed and tested in Western regions, it is unclear whether these findings apply to other regions. We addressed this question by replicating Oosterhof and Todorov's methodology across 11 world regions, 41 countries and 11,570 participants. When we used Oosterhof and Todorov's original analysis strategy, the valence-dominance model generalized across regions. When we used an alternative methodology to allow for correlated dimensions, we observed much less generalization. Collectively, these results suggest that, while the valence-dominance model generalizes very well across regions when dimensions are forced to be orthogonal, regional differences are revealed when we use different extraction methods and correlate and rotate the dimension reduction solution. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 5 November 2018. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7611443.v1 .
在过去的 10 年中,Oosterhof 和 Todorov 的效价-优势模型已经成为解释人们如何在社会维度上评价面孔的最突出的理论。在这个模型中,两个维度(效价和优势)支撑着人们对面孔的社会判断。由于该模型主要在西方地区开发和测试,因此尚不清楚这些发现是否适用于其他地区。我们通过在 11 个世界地区、41 个国家和 11570 名参与者中复制 Oosterhof 和 Todorov 的方法来解决这个问题。当我们使用 Oosterhof 和 Todorov 的原始分析策略时,效价-优势模型在各个地区都得到了很好的概括。当我们使用另一种方法来允许相关维度时,我们观察到的概括程度要低得多。总的来说,这些结果表明,虽然效价-优势模型在维度被强制正交时可以很好地推广到各个地区,但当我们使用不同的提取方法并对降维解决方案进行相关和旋转时,就会揭示出地区差异。 方案注册:该注册报告的第 1 阶段方案于 2018 年 11 月 5 日原则上被接受。该方案已被期刊接受,可以在 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7611443.v1 找到。