• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从面部推断社会信息:环境图像生成三维模型。

Social inferences from faces: ambient images generate a three-dimensional model.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.

出版信息

Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):105-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.001
PMID:23376296
Abstract

Three experiments are presented that investigate the two-dimensional valence/trustworthiness by dominance model of social inferences from faces (Oosterhof & Todorov, 2008). Experiment 1 used image averaging and morphing techniques to demonstrate that consistent facial cues subserve a range of social inferences, even in a highly variable sample of 1000 ambient images (images that are intended to be representative of those encountered in everyday life, see Jenkins, White, Van Montfort, & Burton, 2011). Experiment 2 then tested Oosterhof and Todorov's two-dimensional model on this extensive sample of face images. The original two dimensions were replicated and a novel 'youthful-attractiveness' factor also emerged. Experiment 3 successfully cross-validated the three-dimensional model using face averages directly constructed from the factor scores. These findings highlight the utility of the original trustworthiness and dominance dimensions, but also underscore the need to utilise varied face stimuli: with a more realistically diverse set of face images, social inferences from faces show a more elaborate underlying structure than hitherto suggested.

摘要

本文提出了三个实验,旨在验证面部社会推断的二维效价/可信度主导模型(Oosterhof & Todorov,2008)。实验 1 使用图像平均和变形技术,证明了一致的面部线索可以支持一系列社会推断,即使在一个由 1000 个环境图像组成的高度变化的样本中(这些图像旨在代表日常生活中遇到的那些图像,见 Jenkins、White、Van Montfort 和 Burton,2011)。实验 2 然后在这个广泛的面部图像样本上测试了 Oosterhof 和 Todorov 的二维模型。复制了原始的两个维度,并出现了一个新的“年轻吸引力”因素。实验 3 使用直接从因子得分构建的面部平均值成功地对三维模型进行了交叉验证。这些发现突出了原始可信度和主导维度的实用性,但也强调了需要使用多样化的面部刺激:使用更真实多样的面部图像集,面部社会推断显示出比以前所建议的更精细的潜在结构。

相似文献

1
Social inferences from faces: ambient images generate a three-dimensional model.从面部推断社会信息:环境图像生成三维模型。
Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):105-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
2
Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces.社会感知面孔的基于数据驱动的计算模型的验证。
Emotion. 2013 Aug;13(4):724-38. doi: 10.1037/a0032335. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
3
Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated.面部的性别和刻板印象会影响对面部特征的评价:与刻板印象相悖的女性面孔会得到负面评价。
Br J Psychol. 2015 May;106(2):186-208. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12085. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
4
The perception of attractiveness and trustworthiness in male faces affects hypothetical voting decisions differently in wartime and peacetime scenarios.在战时和和平时期的情景中,男性面孔的吸引力和可信度认知对假设的投票决定产生不同的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(10):2018-32. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.677048. Epub 2012 May 31.
5
Do social utility judgments influence attentional processing?社会效用判断是否会影响注意力加工?
Cognition. 2013 Oct;129(1):114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
6
The valence-dominance model applies to body perception.效价-优势模型适用于身体感知。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Sep 7;9(9):220594. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220594. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Testing the functional basis of first impressions: Dimensions for children's faces are not the same as for adults' faces.测试第一印象的功能基础:儿童面部的维度与成人面部的维度不同。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Nov;117(5):900-924. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000167. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
8
Measuring sexual dimorphism with a race-gender face space.利用种族-性别面部空间测量性别二态性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):1779-88. doi: 10.1037/a0037743. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
9
Unconscious evaluation of faces on social dimensions.无意识的社会维度面孔评价。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):715-27. doi: 10.1037/a0027950. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
10
To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply?社会知觉的价-域模型适用于哪些世界区域?
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jan;5(1):159-169. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01007-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The asymmetry system properties of the visual system: Evidence from serial face processing.视觉系统的不对称系统属性:来自系列面孔加工的证据。
J Vis. 2025 Aug 1;25(10):12. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.10.12.
2
Network models reveal high-dimensional social inferences in naturalistic settings beyond latent construct models.网络模型揭示了超越潜在结构模型的自然环境中的高维社会推理。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 7;3(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00275-w.
3
Validation of facial attributions in leadership: Trustworthiness and age in Chinese mid-level management.
领导力中面部特征归因的验证:中国中层管理人员的可信度与年龄
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0324508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324508. eCollection 2025.
4
Face value: The effect of facial aesthetic treatment on first impressions and partner preferences.票面价值:面部美容治疗对第一印象和伴侣偏好的影响。
Perception. 2025 Sep;54(9):651-673. doi: 10.1177/03010066251337353. Epub 2025 May 26.
5
Gray hair influences perceived age and social perceptions.白发会影响人们对年龄的认知以及社会认知。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 7;16:1541836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1541836. eCollection 2025.
6
Close encounters: Interpersonal proximity amplifies social appraisals.近距离接触:人际距离拉近会增强社会评价。
Br J Psychol. 2025 Aug;116(3):594-616. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12781. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
7
Face evaluation: Findings, methods, and challenges.面部评估:研究结果、方法与挑战。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Mar;1545(1):28-37. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15293. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
8
The Relationship Between Face-Based First Impressions and Perceptions of Purity and Compared to Other Moral Violations.基于面部的第一印象与纯洁感认知之间的关系以及与其他道德违规行为的比较。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 16;14(12):1205. doi: 10.3390/bs14121205.
9
Neural dynamics of personality trait perception and interaction preferences.人格特质感知与互动偏好的神经动力学
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 12;14(1):30455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76423-9.
10
How trait impressions of faces shape subsequent mental state inferences.面部特征印象如何塑造后续的心理状态推断。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jan;9(1):208-226. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02059-4. Epub 2024 Dec 2.