Suppr超能文献

高强度间歇运动与抗阻运动对血糖调节反应的比较。

A Comparison of the Gluco-Regulatory Responses to High-Intensity Interval Exercise and Resistance Exercise.

机构信息

Holsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC 3550, Australia.

Department of Physiology, Anatomy & Microbiology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 2;18(1):287. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010287.

Abstract

High-intensity interval exercise and resistance exercise both effectively lower blood glucose; however, it is not clear whether different regulatory mechanisms exist. This randomised cross-over study compared the acute gluco-regulatory and the physiological responses of high-intensity interval exercise and resistance exercise. Sixteen (eight males and eight females) recreationally active individuals, aged (mean ± SD) 22 ± 7 years, participated with a seven-day period between interventions. The high-intensity interval exercise trial consisted of twelve, 30 s cycling intervals at 80% of peak power capacity and 90 s active recovery. The resistance exercise trial consisted of four sets of 10 repetitions for three lower-limb exercises at 80% 1-RM, matched for duration of high-intensity interval exercise. Exercise was performed after an overnight fast, with blood samples collected every 30 min, for two hours after exercise. There was a significant interaction between time and intervention for glucose ( = 0.02), which was, on average (mean ± SD), 0.7 ± 0.7 mmol∙L higher following high-intensity interval exercise, as compared to resistance exercise. Cortisol concentration over time was affected by intervention ( = 0.03), with cortisol 70 ± 103 ng∙mL higher ( = 0.015), on average, following high-intensity interval exercise. Resistance exercise did not induce the acute rise in glucose that was induced by high-intensity interval exercise and appears to be an appropriate alternative to positively regulate blood glucose.

摘要

高强度间歇运动和抗阻运动均能有效降低血糖;然而,目前尚不清楚是否存在不同的调节机制。本随机交叉研究比较了高强度间歇运动和抗阻运动的急性血糖调节和生理反应。16 名(8 名男性和 8 名女性)有规律运动的个体,年龄(均值 ± 标准差)为 22 ± 7 岁,每两次干预之间间隔 7 天。高强度间歇运动试验包括 12 个 30 秒的自行车间歇,强度为 80%的峰值功率,90 秒主动恢复。抗阻运动试验包括三组 10 次的下肢运动,每组 4 次,强度为 80%的 1 次重复最大值,与高强度间歇运动的持续时间相匹配。运动在禁食过夜后进行,运动后两小时内每 30 分钟采集一次血样。血糖( = 0.02)在时间和干预之间存在显著交互作用,与抗阻运动相比,高强度间歇运动后血糖平均(均值 ± 标准差)升高 0.7 ± 0.7 mmol·L。皮质醇浓度随时间的变化受到干预的影响( = 0.03),与抗阻运动相比,高强度间歇运动后皮质醇平均升高 70 ± 103 ng·mL( = 0.015)。抗阻运动不会引起高强度间歇运动引起的血糖急性升高,似乎是一种调节血糖的合适替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7e/7795282/60a73eba47ce/ijerph-18-00287-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验