Tong Tomas K, Kong Zhaowei, Shi Xueying, Shi Qingde
Dr. Stephen Hui Research Centre for Physical Recreation and Wellness, Department of Physical Education, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.
Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau.
J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:8083738. doi: 10.1155/2017/8083738. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
This study compared the effects of a single bout of resistance exercise (RES) on glycemic homeostasis to isotime sprint interval exercise (SIE) using a within-subjects design. Nineteen nondiabetic males (age: 23.3 ± 0.7 yrs; height: 173.1 ± 1.2 cm; weight: 79.1 ± 4.8 kg; % fat: 22.5 ± 2.5%) were studied. RES involved nine exercises of 10 repetitions at 75% 1-RM using a 2 : 2 s tempo and was interspersed with a one-minute recovery; SIE involved four 30 s' all-out cycling effort interspersed with four minutes of active recovery. Plasma glucose and insulin in response to a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test were assessed 12 h after exercise. In comparison to a no exercise control trial (CON), the area under curve (AUC) of plasma glucose was reduced with both RES and SIE ( < 0.05), while insulin AUC was only reduced with RES. Cederholm, Gutt, Matsuda, and HOMA indices were improved ( < 0.05) following RES compared to CON. Corresponding changes following SIE were only found in Cederholm and Gutt indices ( < 0.05). No difference was found in plasma variables and indices between RES and SIE ( > 0.05). Such findings suggest that the RES may represent a potential alternative to the SIE in the development of time-efficient lifestyle intervention strategies for improving diabetes risk factors in healthy populations.
本研究采用受试者自身对照设计,比较了单次抗阻运动(RES)和等时冲刺间歇运动(SIE)对血糖稳态的影响。研究对象为19名非糖尿病男性(年龄:23.3±0.7岁;身高:173.1±1.2厘米;体重:79.1±4.8千克;体脂率:22.5±2.5%)。RES包括9项运动,以2∶2秒的节奏进行10次重复,负荷为1-RM的75%,每组运动间穿插1分钟休息;SIE包括4次全力骑行30秒,每次之间穿插4分钟的主动恢复。运动后12小时,评估受试者口服75克葡萄糖耐量试验后的血浆葡萄糖和胰岛素水平。与无运动对照试验(CON)相比,RES和SIE均使血浆葡萄糖曲线下面积(AUC)降低(P<0.05),而胰岛素AUC仅在RES后降低。与CON相比,RES后Cederholm、Gutt、Matsuda和HOMA指数均得到改善(P<0.05)。SIE后仅在Cederholm和Gutt指数上出现相应变化(P<0.05)。RES和SIE之间的血浆变量和指数无差异(P>0.05)。这些结果表明,在制定高效的生活方式干预策略以改善健康人群糖尿病风险因素方面,RES可能是SIE的一种潜在替代方案。