Craddock Joel C, Genoni Angela, Strutt Emma F, Goldman David M
Sydney School of Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, 6027, Australia.
Curr Nutr Rep. 2021 Mar;10(1):93-98. doi: 10.1007/s13668-020-00348-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
This review describes several limitations of the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) with a focus on its application to plant-based dietary patterns.
Evaluating protein quality in terms of digestibility is paramount to support and optimize the health and well-being of human populations in situations where food insecurity and protein energy malnutrition are widespread. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations has endorsed the DIAAS to replace the previously recommended Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) for protein quality assessment. While multiple strengths characterize the DIAAS, substantial limitations remain, many of which are accentuated in the context of a plant-based dietary pattern. Some of these limitations include a failure to translate differences in nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors between plant- and animal-based foods, limited representation of commonly consumed plant-based foods within the scoring framework, inadequate recognition of the increased digestibility of commonly consumed heat-treated and processed plant-based foods, its formulation centered on fast-growing animal models rather than humans, and a focus on individual isolated foods vs the food matrix. The DIAAS is also increasingly being used out of context where its application could produce erroneous results such as exercise settings. When investigating protein quality, particularly in a plant-based dietary context, the DIAAS should ideally be avoided.
本综述阐述了可消化必需氨基酸评分(DIAAS)的若干局限性,重点在于其在基于植物性饮食模式中的应用。
在粮食不安全和蛋白质能量营养不良普遍存在的情况下,从消化率角度评估蛋白质质量对于支持和优化人群的健康与福祉至关重要。联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)已认可DIAAS,以取代先前推荐的用于蛋白质质量评估的蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分(PDCAAS)。虽然DIAAS有诸多优点,但仍存在重大局限性,其中许多在基于植物性饮食模式的背景下更为突出。这些局限性包括未能转化植物性和动物性食物之间氮与蛋白质转化因子的差异、评分框架内常见植物性食物的代表性有限、对常见热处理和加工植物性食物消化率提高的认识不足、其配方以快速生长的动物模型而非人类为中心,以及关注单个分离的食物而非食物基质。DIAAS也越来越多地在其应用可能产生错误结果的背景下被使用,如运动场景。在研究蛋白质质量时,尤其是在基于植物性饮食的背景下,理想情况下应避免使用DIAAS。