Department of Public Health Sciences, UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, University of Virginia, 16 East Main Street, Christiansburg, VA24073, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA22903, USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(11):3242-3252. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000069. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
The objective of the current study was to identify factors across the socio-ecological model (SEM) associated with adolescents' sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake.
This cross-sectional study surveyed adolescents using previously validated instruments. Analyses included descriptive statistics, ANOVA tests and stepwise nonlinear regression models (i.e., two-part models) adjusted to be cluster robust. Guided by SEM, a four-step model was used to identify factors associated with adolescent SSB intake - step 1: demographics (i.e., age, gender), step 2: intrapersonal (i.e., theory of planned behaviour (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, behavioural intentions), health literacy, media literacy, public health literacy), step 3: interpersonal (i.e., caregiver's SSB behaviours, caregiver's SSB rules) and step 4: environmental (i.e., home SSB availability) level variables.
Eight middle schools across four rural southwest Virginia counties in Appalachia.
Seven hundred ninety seventh grade students (55·4 % female, 44·6 % males, mean age 12 (sd 0·5) years).
Mean SSB intake was 36·3 (sd 42·5) fluid ounces or 433·4 (sd 493·6) calories per day. In the final step of the regression model, seven variables significantly explained adolescent's SSB consumption: behavioural intention (P < 0·05), affective attitude (P < 0·05), perceived behavioural control (P < 0·05), health literacy (P < 0·001), caregiver behaviours (P < 0·05), caregiver rules (P < 0·05) and home availability (P < 0·001).
SSB intake among adolescents in rural Appalachia was nearly three times above national mean. Home environment was the strongest predictor of adolescent SSB intake, followed by caregiver rules, caregiver behaviours and health literacy. Future interventions targeting these factors may provide the greatest opportunity to improve adolescent SSB intake.
本研究旨在确定社会生态模型(SEM)中与青少年含糖饮料(SSB)摄入相关的因素。
本横断面研究使用先前经过验证的工具调查了青少年。分析包括描述性统计、方差分析检验和逐步非线性回归模型(即两部分模型),并进行了聚类稳健调整。在 SEM 的指导下,使用四步模型来确定与青少年 SSB 摄入相关的因素-第 1 步:人口统计学(即年龄、性别),第 2 步:个体内部(即计划行为理论(态度、主观规范、感知行为控制、行为意图)、健康素养、媒体素养、公共卫生素养),第 3 步:人际(即照顾者的 SSB 行为、照顾者的 SSB 规则)和第 4 步:环境(即家庭 SSB 供应)水平变量。
阿巴拉契亚州西南部弗吉尼亚州的四个农村县的八所中学。
797 名七年级学生(55.4%女性,44.6%男性,平均年龄 12(标准差 0.5)岁)。
平均 SSB 摄入量为 36.3(标准差 42.5)液盎司或 433.4(标准差 493.6)卡路里/天。在回归模型的最后一步,七个变量显著解释了青少年 SSB 的消费:行为意向(P < 0.05)、情感态度(P < 0.05)、感知行为控制(P < 0.05)、健康素养(P < 0.001)、照顾者行为(P < 0.05)、照顾者规则(P < 0.05)和家庭供应(P < 0.001)。
阿巴拉契亚农村地区青少年的 SSB 摄入量几乎是全国平均水平的三倍。家庭环境是青少年 SSB 摄入量的最强预测因素,其次是照顾者的规则、照顾者的行为和健康素养。针对这些因素的未来干预措施可能为改善青少年 SSB 摄入量提供最大机会。