• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童对表征变化的理解及其与错误信念理解和表象-现实区分的关系。

Children's understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction.

作者信息

Gopnik A, Astington J W

机构信息

Scarborough College, University of Toronto.

出版信息

Child Dev. 1988 Feb;59(1):26-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1988.tb03192.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1988.tb03192.x
PMID:3342716
Abstract

This research concerns the development of children's understanding of representational change and its relation to other cognitive developments. Children were shown deceptive objects, and the true nature of the objects was then revealed. Children were then asked what they thought the object was when they first saw it, testing their understanding of representational change; what another child would think the object was, testing their understanding of false belief; and what the object looked like and really was, testing their understanding of the appearance-reality distinction. Most 3-year-olds answered the representational change question incorrectly. Most 5-year-olds did not make this error. Children's performance on the representational change question was poorer than their performance on the false-belief question. There were correlations between performance on all 3 tasks. Apparently children begin to be able to consider alternative representations of the same object at about age 4.

摘要

这项研究关注儿童对表征变化的理解发展及其与其他认知发展的关系。向儿童展示具有欺骗性的物体,然后揭示物体的真实性质。接着询问儿童当他们第一次看到该物体时认为它是什么,以此测试他们对表征变化的理解;另一个孩子会认为该物体是什么,以此测试他们对错误信念的理解;以及该物体看起来像什么和实际上是什么,以此测试他们对表象与现实差异的理解。大多数3岁儿童对表征变化问题回答错误。大多数5岁儿童没有犯这个错误。儿童在表征变化问题上的表现比在错误信念问题上的表现更差。这三项任务的表现之间存在相关性。显然,儿童大约在4岁时开始能够考虑同一物体的不同表征。

相似文献

1
Children's understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction.儿童对表征变化的理解及其与错误信念理解和表象-现实区分的关系。
Child Dev. 1988 Feb;59(1):26-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1988.tb03192.x.
2
Three-year-olds' difficulty with the appearance--reality distinction: is it real or is it apparent?三岁幼儿在区分表象与现实方面存在的困难:这是真实存在的还是看似如此?
Dev Psychol. 2000 Sep;36(5):547-560. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.5.547.
3
When representations conflict with reality: the preschooler's problem with false beliefs and "false" photographs.当表象与现实冲突时:学龄前儿童面临的错误信念和“假”照片问题。
Cognition. 1990 Apr;35(1):41-68. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90036-j.
4
Perceptual Access Reasoning (PAR) in Developing a Representational Theory of Mind.发展心理表象理论的知觉访问推理 (PAR)。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2021 Sep;86(3):7-154. doi: 10.1111/mono.12432.
5
Processing Demands Impact 3-Year-Olds' Performance in a Spontaneous-Response Task: New Evidence for the Processing-Load Account of Early False-Belief Understanding.加工需求影响3岁儿童在自发反应任务中的表现:早期错误信念理解的加工负荷解释的新证据
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 12;10(11):e0142405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142405. eCollection 2015.
6
Intellectual realism: the role of children's interpretations of pictures and perceptual verbs.理智现实主义:儿童对图片和感知动词的理解所起的作用。
Child Dev. 1985 Jun;56(3):664-70.
7
Small-scale deceit: deception as a marker of two-, three-, and four-year-olds' early theories of mind.小规模欺骗:欺骗作为2岁、3岁和4岁儿童早期心理理论的一个标志。
Child Dev. 1989 Dec;60(6):1263-77.
8
Young children's understanding of multiple object identity: appearance, pretense and function.幼儿对多个物体同一性的理解:外观、假装和功能。
Dev Sci. 2006 Nov;9(6):590-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00537.x.
9
Children's understanding of mental phenomena.儿童对心理现象的理解。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 1989;22:41-87. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60412-7.
10
Children's understanding of pictorial and mental representations.儿童对图像和心理表征的理解。
Child Dev. 1998 Apr;69(2):321-32.

引用本文的文献

1
The Comprehensive Assessment of Theory of Mind (CAT): A Novel Measure of 3- to 8-Year-Old Children's Theory of Mind and an Evaluation of Mental-State Scaling.心理理论综合评估(CAT):一种测量3至8岁儿童心理理论的新方法及心理状态量表评估
Child Dev. 2025 Sep-Oct;96(5):1787-1806. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14263. Epub 2025 Jul 12.
2
Autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia: a phenomenological comparison.自闭症谱系障碍与精神分裂症:现象学比较
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 28;16:1546453. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1546453. eCollection 2025.
3
Protocol for evaluating the effects of integrating music with taekwondo training in children with autism spectrum disorder: A randomized controlled trial.
评估音乐与跆拳道训练相结合对自闭症谱系障碍儿童影响的方案:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0315503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315503. eCollection 2025.
4
The COVID-19 pandemic and social cognitive outcomes in early childhood.COVID-19 大流行与儿童早期的社会认知结果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 22;14(1):28939. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80532-w.
5
Theory of mind skills and peer relationships in children's adjustment to preschool.儿童在适应幼儿园过程中的心理理论技能与同伴关系
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 24;15:1373898. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1373898. eCollection 2024.
6
Mothers' Mental State Talk and 3- to 5-Year-Old Children's Theory of Mind: Their Reciprocal Dynamic Impact.母亲的心理状态谈话与3至5岁儿童的心理理论:它们的相互动态影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 5;14(7):568. doi: 10.3390/bs14070568.
7
The roles of language and executive function in Mandarin-speaking children's theory of mind development.语言与执行功能在说普通话儿童心理理论发展中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 12;15:1354207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1354207. eCollection 2024.
8
Picture book reading improves children's learning understanding.阅读绘本有助于提高孩子的学习理解能力。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2025 Mar;43(1):12-35. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12479. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
9
How experts and novices judge other people's knowledgeability from language use.专家和新手如何从语言使用判断他人的知识水平。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1627-1637. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02433-9. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
10
Intensionality is more cognitively demanding than false belief in adults: evidence from a non-inferential sentence-reading task.在认知上,内涵性比成年人的错误信念更具挑战性:来自非推理句子阅读任务的证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51181-w.