Suppr超能文献

物理对抗措施与药物对抗措施。对发热兔子的研究。

Physical versus pharmacological counter-measures. Studies on febrile rabbits.

作者信息

Wenzel C, Werner J

机构信息

Institut für Physiologie, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57(1):81-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00691243.

Abstract

128 experiments were carried out on febrile rabbits at air temperatures of 8, 18, 24 and 30 degrees C in order to analyze the thermoregulatory effects and mechanisms of physical and/or pharmacological counter-measures. Fever was achieved by injection of 0.1 micrograms Salmonella typhi endotoxin (LPS)/kg into an ear vein. As the pharmacological counter-measure, injections of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) into an ear vein were chosen. For the physical counter-measure, cooling thermodes (5 degrees C) were constructed for the abdominal skin, for the ear and for the rectum. ASA injections had no effect on the first fever maximum, even if applied 20 to 60 min before the LPS injection, but eliminated the second fever maximum. Of course, the additional hyperthermia observed at 30 degrees C ambient temperature could not be eliminated by the injections. On the other hand, cooling procedures can obviously not affect the pyrogen-induced temperature increase, but reduce the hyperthermic effect of a higher ambient temperature. Rectal cooling was more effective than ear or abdominal skin cooling. Abdominal cooling evoked an increase in metabolic heat production. Application of combined physical and pharmacological counter-measures achieved the strongest and quickest reduction of the second maximum, whereas the first maximum was not affected, as in all other experiments. The study emphasizes the necessity of taking into account the time course of the effector mechanisms in order to discriminate between hyperthermic and febrile components of temperature increase. In the initial phase cooling measures would evoke unwanted regulatory responses of the effectors, whereas during the second febrile maximum they would achieve a quicker reduction of core temperatures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为了分析物理和/或药理学对抗措施的体温调节作用及机制,在8、18、24和30摄氏度的气温下,对发热家兔进行了128次实验。通过向耳静脉注射0.1微克伤寒沙门氏菌内毒素(LPS)/千克来诱发发热。作为药理学对抗措施,选择向耳静脉注射乙酰水杨酸(ASA)。对于物理对抗措施,为腹部皮肤、耳朵和直肠构建了冷却温度探头(5摄氏度)。即使在注射LPS前20至60分钟注射ASA,对第一次发热峰值也没有影响,但消除了第二次发热峰值。当然,在30摄氏度环境温度下观察到的额外体温过高不能通过注射消除。另一方面,冷却程序显然不会影响热原引起的体温升高,但会降低较高环境温度的体温过高效应。直肠冷却比耳朵或腹部皮肤冷却更有效。腹部冷却引起代谢产热增加。联合应用物理和药理学对抗措施能最强烈、最快地降低第二次峰值,而第一次峰值不受影响,与所有其他实验一样。该研究强调,为了区分体温升高的体温过高和发热成分,必须考虑效应器机制的时间进程。在初始阶段,冷却措施会引起效应器不必要的调节反应,而在第二次发热峰值期间,它们会更快地降低核心体温。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验