Suppr超能文献

关节内注射基质血管成分治疗膝骨关节炎的安全性和有效性评估:系统评价。

Assessment of safety and efficacy of intra-articular injection of stromal vascular fraction for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis-a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Apollo Hospital, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.

Department of Orthopedics, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2021 Mar;45(3):615-625. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04926-x. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) as an injectable regenerative therapy for knee osteoarthritis (OA) has gained recent popularity. However, there is no clear consensus on the outcomes of such treatment. We systematically reviewed available evidence on the use of SVF injection in the treatment of knee OA.

METHODS

The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with keyword search in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library Database and related article search in Google Scholar. Clinical studies demonstrating effects of SVF in knee OA and published in English literature were included. Risk of bias assessment was done with modified Coleman Methodology Scoring (CMS).

RESULTS

Eleven studies (9 prospective, 2 retrospective) that contributed to 290 knees in 200 patients were included. Two studies that contributed to 3718 knee injections were excluded from pooled analysis and were scrutinized separately. Majority of patients reported improvement in pain, range of motion (ROM), functional rating, six metre walking distance, and functional outcome scores. There was no major donor-site morbidity. There was only one reported case of knee joint infection and no case of tumour formation in relation to SVF injection.

DISCUSSION

Intra-articular injection of SVF can be a simple, affordable, and minimally invasive treatment that could serve as an interim option for patients who failed other conservative and arthroscopic options.

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular injection of SVF is a safe and effective technique for the management of knee OA. However, comparative Level I studies are needed to support the use of adjuvants with SVF and also to compare the use of SVF (with or without adjuvants) with ADMSCs, PRP, and bone marrow concentrate.

摘要

目的

基质血管成分(SVF)作为一种可注射的膝关节骨关节炎(OA)再生治疗方法,最近受到了广泛关注。然而,对于这种治疗方法的结果,目前还没有明确的共识。我们系统地回顾了目前关于 SVF 注射治疗膝骨关节炎的证据。

方法

该研究根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行,在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中进行关键字搜索,并在 Google Scholar 中进行相关文章搜索。纳入了在英文文献中显示 SVF 对膝骨关节炎有疗效的临床研究。采用改良的 Coleman 方法学评分(CMS)进行偏倚风险评估。

结果

纳入了 11 项研究(9 项前瞻性研究,2 项回顾性研究),涉及 200 名患者的 290 个膝关节。有 2 项研究(涉及 3718 次膝关节注射)被排除在汇总分析之外,并单独进行了详细审查。大多数患者报告疼痛、关节活动度(ROM)、功能评分、六米步行距离和功能结局评分均有改善。供区无明显并发症。仅报告了 1 例膝关节感染病例,与 SVF 注射相关的病例无肿瘤形成。

讨论

关节内注射 SVF 是一种简单、经济、微创的治疗方法,可以作为其他保守和关节镜治疗方法失败的患者的一种临时选择。

结论

关节内注射 SVF 是一种安全有效的膝关节 OA 治疗方法。然而,需要进行比较 I 级的研究,以支持 SVF 与赋形剂的联合应用,并比较 SVF(有或没有赋形剂)与 ADMSCs、PRP 和骨髓浓缩物的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验