Mundluru Vamsi Krishna, Naidu M J, Mundluru Ravi Teja, Jeyaraman Naveen, Muthu Sathish, Ramasubramanian Swaminathan, Jeyaraman Madhan
Department of Orthopaedics, MJ Naidu Super Speciality Hospital, Vijayawada 520002, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Department of Regenerative Medicine, StemC Clinics, Vijayawada 520002, Andhra Pradesh, India.
World J Methodol. 2024 Jun 20;14(2):94562. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i2.94562.
Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) have garnered substantial interest in regenerative medicine due to their potential to treat a wide range of conditions. Traditional enzymatic methods for isolating these cells face challenges such as high costs, lengthy processing time, and regu-latory complexities.
This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and practicality of non-enzymatic, mechanical methods for isolating SVF and ADSCs, comparing these to conventional enzymatic approaches.
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Studies were selected based on inclusion criteria focused on non-enzymatic isolation methods for SVF and ADSCs from adipose tissue. The risk of bias was assessed, and a qualitative synthesis of findings was performed due to the methodological heterogeneity of the included studies.
Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, highlighting various mechanical techniques such as centrifugation, vortexing, and ultrasonic cavitation. The review identified significant variability in cell yield and viability, and the integrity of isolated cells across different non-enzymatic methods compared to enzymatic procedures. Despite some advantages of mechanical methods, including reduced processing time and avoidance of enzymatic reagents, the evidence suggests a need for optimization to match the cell quality and therapeutic efficacy achievable with enzymatic isolation.
Non-enzymatic, mechanical methods offer a promising alternative to enzymatic isolation of SVF and ADSCs, potentially simplifying the isolation process and reducing regulatory hurdles. However, further research is necessary to standardize these techniques and ensure consistent, high-quality cell yields for clinical applications. The development of efficient, safe, and reproducible non-enzymatic isolation methods could significantly advance the field of regenerative medicine.
脂肪来源干细胞(ADSCs)和基质血管成分(SVF)因其具有治疗多种疾病的潜力,在再生医学领域引起了广泛关注。传统的酶法分离这些细胞面临着成本高、处理时间长和监管复杂等挑战。
本系统评价旨在评估非酶促机械方法分离SVF和ADSCs的有效性和实用性,并将其与传统酶法进行比较。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,在多个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。根据纳入标准选择了聚焦于从脂肪组织中采用非酶促方法分离SVF和ADSCs的研究。评估了偏倚风险,并由于纳入研究的方法学异质性,对研究结果进行了定性综合分析。
19项研究符合纳入标准,突出了多种机械技术,如离心、涡旋和超声空化。该评价发现,与酶法相比,不同非酶促方法在细胞产量、活力以及分离细胞的完整性方面存在显著差异。尽管机械方法具有一些优势,包括减少处理时间和避免使用酶试剂,但证据表明仍需优化以达到与酶法分离相当的细胞质量和治疗效果。
非酶促机械方法为酶法分离SVF和ADSCs提供了一种有前景的替代方法,可能简化分离过程并减少监管障碍。然而,需要进一步研究来规范这些技术,确保临床应用中获得一致、高质量的细胞产量。开发高效、安全且可重复的非酶促分离方法可能会显著推动再生医学领域的发展。