Evaluation of Hydrogen Peroxide and Cetylpyridinium Chloride as Bacterial Decontaminants of Dental Unit Water Lines at a Private Peruvian Dental School.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the hydrogen peroxide and cetylpyridinium chloride as bacterial decontaminants of dental unit water lines at a private Peruvian dental school.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Water samples were obtained from 66 dental units of a University Dental Clinic before decontamination treatment and at days 3 and 7 thereafter. The biofilm treatments were applied equitably among the two treatment groups ( = 22) and one negative control (distilled water). The samples obtained on each collection day were taken to the biochemical laboratory in thermal boxes and then diluted, seeded, and incubated at 37°C for 24h to count colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL).

RESULTS

The samples to which hydrogen peroxide were applied had a mean of 1.53 × 10 CFU/mL before application, 0.04 × 10 CFU/mL at day 3, and 0.03 × 10 CFU/mL at day 7, whereas the samples undergoing cetylpyridinium chloride treatment had a mean of 1.74 × 10 CFU/mL before application, 615.38 CFU/mL on day 3, and 307.69 CFU/mL on day 7. Distilled water treatment showed a mean of 1.72 × 10 ± 0.39 × 10 CFU/mL at baseline, 1.51 × 10 ± 1.40 × 10 CFU/mL at day 3, and a mean of 1.74 × 10 ± 0.47 × 10 CFU/mL at day 7. Statistically significant differences were found among the three treatment groups at days 3 ( ≤ 0.001) and 7 ( ≤ 0.001) but not at baseline ( = 0.306).

CONCLUSIONS

The antibacterial effect of cetylpyridinium chloride was significantly greater than that of hydrogen peroxide and distilled water, and can, therefore, be used for bacterial control in the water lines of dental units.