Seyedjavadi Maryam, Jafari Mehdi, Ravaghi Hamid, Aryankhesal Aidin
Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management & Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Health Managers Development Institute, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Nov 3;34:148. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.148. eCollection 2020.
Supervision in health sector means a system, process, or mechanism by which some aspects or characteristics of a health care organization is evaluated and analyzed by an external body. This study compared the mechanisms of supervision in ambulatory care in selected countries to provide lessons learnt from global experiences. In this comparative study USA, UK, Germany, Canada, Turkey, and Iran were selected based on inclusion criteria, including development level and type of the health system. Required data were gathered by searching the internet, browsing the websites of related organizations, and searching research databases. Then, the results were summarized and reported using comparative tables. Some regulations and frameworks exist for assuring and improving the quality and safety of the services in all health systems. The supervising bodies of this subject include central and local governments along with nongovernmental organizations. The supervision in studied countries is mostly compulsory and unannounced. Moreover, accreditation of ambulatory care exists voluntarily and compulsorily. Results of the supervision include temporary or permanent suspension of license for care provision, impact on payment to the providers, and change in popularity of the provider by public communication of the result. Improving the supervision on ambulatory care requires an effective structure for separation of provider and supervisor and the involvement of the professional associations. It is suggested to elevate the ambulatory care supervision through better resource allocation, follow up of the supervision results, enforcement of regulations, and application of novel approaches.
卫生部门的监管是指一个系统、过程或机制,通过该机制,外部机构对医疗保健组织的某些方面或特征进行评估和分析。本研究比较了部分国家门诊护理的监管机制,以汲取全球经验教训。在这项比较研究中,美国、英国、德国、加拿大、土耳其和伊朗是根据纳入标准选定的,这些标准包括卫生系统的发展水平和类型。所需数据通过互联网搜索、浏览相关组织的网站以及搜索研究数据库来收集。然后,使用比较表对结果进行总结和报告。所有卫生系统都存在一些确保和提高服务质量与安全的法规和框架。该领域的监管机构包括中央和地方政府以及非政府组织。在所研究国家,监管大多是强制性且不事先通知的。此外,门诊护理的认证分为自愿和强制两种。监管结果包括临时或永久吊销护理提供许可证、对提供者支付的影响以及通过结果的公开传播改变提供者的知名度。改善门诊护理监管需要一个有效的结构,以实现提供者与监管者的分离,并让专业协会参与其中。建议通过更好的资源分配、对监管结果的跟进、法规的执行以及新方法的应用来加强门诊护理监管。