• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机事件可以解释社交网络中意见的持续聚类和极化。

Stochastic events can explain sustained clustering and polarisation of opinions in social networks.

机构信息

CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, GPO Box 1538, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.

Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 14;11(1):1355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80353-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-80353-7
PMID:33446774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7809277/
Abstract

Understanding the processes underlying development and persistence of polarised opinions has been one of the key challenges in social networks for more than two decades. While plausible mechanisms have been suggested, they assume quite specialised interactions between individuals or groups that may only be relevant in particular contexts. We propose that a more broadly relevant explanation might be associated with the influence of external events. An agent-based bounded-confidence model has been used to demonstrate persistent polarisation of opinions within populations exposed to stochastic events (of positive and negative influence) even when all interactions between individuals are noisy and assimilative. Events can have a large impact on the distribution of opinions because their influence acts synchronistically across a large proportion of the population, whereas an individual can only interact with small numbers of other individuals at any particular time.

摘要

理解导致观点极化的发展和持续的过程是社交网络 20 多年来的主要挑战之一。虽然已经提出了一些可行的机制,但它们假设了个体或群体之间相当特殊的相互作用,这些相互作用可能只在特定的背景下才相关。我们提出,一个更广泛适用的解释可能与外部事件的影响有关。基于代理的有界置信模型被用来证明即使在个体之间的所有相互作用都是嘈杂和同化的情况下,暴露于随机事件(正面和负面影响)的人群中观点仍然会持续极化。事件会对意见的分布产生重大影响,因为它们的影响在很大一部分人群中同步发生,而个体在任何特定时间只能与少数其他个体相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47cb/7809277/96c544d788c7/41598_2020_80353_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47cb/7809277/b0e734ea3d3b/41598_2020_80353_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47cb/7809277/bc9d2170b36d/41598_2020_80353_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47cb/7809277/b6526db0a0a2/41598_2020_80353_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47cb/7809277/96c544d788c7/41598_2020_80353_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47cb/7809277/b0e734ea3d3b/41598_2020_80353_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47cb/7809277/bc9d2170b36d/41598_2020_80353_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47cb/7809277/b6526db0a0a2/41598_2020_80353_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47cb/7809277/96c544d788c7/41598_2020_80353_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stochastic events can explain sustained clustering and polarisation of opinions in social networks.随机事件可以解释社交网络中意见的持续聚类和极化。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 14;11(1):1355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80353-7.
2
Bounded Confidence Evolution of Opinions and Actions in Social Networks.社交网络中意见和行为的有界置信度演化。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2022 Jul;52(7):7017-7028. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3043635. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
3
Opinion formation with time-varying bounded confidence.具有时变有限信心的观点形成
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 6;12(3):e0172982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172982. eCollection 2017.
4
Explaining opinion polarisation with opinion copulas.用观点系词解释观点两极分化。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 22;12(8):e0183277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183277. eCollection 2017.
5
Bursts of communication increase opinion diversity in the temporal Deffuant model.在时间Deffuant模型中,交流的突发增加了观点的多样性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 26;14(1):2222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52458-w.
6
Steering opinion dynamics via containment control.通过抑制控制引导舆论动态。
Comput Soc Netw. 2017;4(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40649-017-0048-0. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
7
Bias in social interactions and emergence of extremism in complex social networks.社交互动中的偏见与复杂社交网络中的极端主义的出现。
Chaos. 2020 Oct;30(10):103110. doi: 10.1063/5.0009943.
8
Modelling opinion dynamics in the age of algorithmic personalisation.算法个性化时代的舆论动态建模。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 13;9(1):7261. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43830-2.
9
Opinion formation and distribution in a bounded-confidence model on various networks.各种网络上基于有界置信模型的观点形成和分布。
Phys Rev E. 2018 Feb;97(2-1):022312. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.022312.
10
Dynamics of collective action to conserve a large common-pool resource.集体行动保护大型共有资源的动态。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 28;11(1):9208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87109-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Early morning hour and evening usage habits increase misinformation-spread.清晨和傍晚的使用习惯会增加错误信息的传播。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 30;14(1):20233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69447-8.
2
Towards vibrant fish populations and sustainable fisheries that benefit all: learning from the last 30 years to inform the next 30 years.迈向拥有生机勃勃的鱼类种群和惠及所有人的可持续渔业:从过去30年中汲取经验,为未来30年提供指导。
Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2023;33(2):317-347. doi: 10.1007/s11160-023-09765-8. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
3
Opinion amplification causes extreme polarization in social networks.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling Echo Chambers and Polarization Dynamics in Social Networks.社交网络中的回音室效应和极化动态建模。
Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Jan 31;124(4):048301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.048301.
2
The social physics collective.社会物理学集体
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 12;9(1):16549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53300-4.
3
Differentiation without distancing. explaining bi-polarization of opinions without negative influence.求同存异。在不产生负面影响的情况下解释观点的两极分化。
观点放大导致社交网络的极端极化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 28;12(1):18131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22856-z.
4
Opinion Polarization in Human Communities Can Emerge as a Natural Consequence of Beliefs Being Interrelated.人类群体中的观点两极分化可能会作为信念相互关联的自然结果而出现。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Sep 19;24(9):1320. doi: 10.3390/e24091320.
5
A general framework to link theory and empirics in opinion formation models.在观点形成模型中连接理论与实证的一般框架。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 1;12(1):5543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09468-3.
6
Polarization and tipping points.极化和 tipping points。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 14;118(50). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102144118.
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e74516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074516. eCollection 2013.
4
Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation.社会影响与意见形成的集体动态。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 5;8(11):e78433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078433. eCollection 2013.
5
Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks.识别社交网络中的有影响力和易感染成员。
Science. 2012 Jul 20;337(6092):337-41. doi: 10.1126/science.1215842. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
6
Individualization as driving force of clustering phenomena in humans.个体化是人类聚类现象的驱动力。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Oct 21;6(10):e1000959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000959.
7
Advice Taking in Decision Making: Egocentric Discounting and Reputation Formation.决策中的采纳建议:自我中心折扣与声誉形成。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Nov;83(2):260-281. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2909.
8
Attitude change: persuasion and social influence.态度改变:说服与社会影响。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:539-70. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539.