Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Kerem Aydınlar Kampusu, Icerenkoy Mah. Kayısdagı Cad. No:32, Atasehir, 34752, İstanbul, Turkey.
Chest Wall Deformities and Pectus Association, Zuhtupasa Mah. Kadıkoy, İstanbul, Turkey.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Jun;37(6):765-775. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-04857-7. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
The present study aimed to compare the physical and psychosocial conditions of adolescents with pectus excavatum (PE) and pectus carinatum (PC), who had mild-severe deformities, with those of healthy controls (HC).
This study included 180 adolescents (aged 10-18 years) with pectus deformity [PE (n = 90) and PC (n = 90)] and 90 age-matched HC. The following parameters were evaluated for each participant: clinical parameters, perceived appearance of the chest area (PAC), physical functions (grip strength, flexibility, muscle strength, endurance, physical activity), posture, psychosocial conditions, and quality of life (QOL).
Patients with PE and PC had a lower body weight, a worse, a poorer posture, lower scores for physical functions compared to the HC group (p < 0.001, all). The PE group had lower scores (p < 0.05) for some psychosocial conditions and quality of life subscales compared to the HC and PC (except for the QOL) group (p < 0.05). The PC group had a poorer posture compared to the PE group (p < 0.05). PAC was associated with physical functions and psychosocial status (r = 0.19-0.40, p < 0.05) but pectus severity was not associated with these parameters (r = 0.02-0.12, p > 0.05).
Our results indicate that all adolescents with mild, moderate, or severe pectus deformity should undergo a biopsychosocial evaluation, receive psychosocial support, and be referred for physiotherapy.
本研究旨在比较患有轻度至重度畸形的鸡胸(PE)和漏斗胸(PC)青少年与健康对照组(HC)的身体和心理社会状况。
本研究纳入了 180 名患有胸廓畸形的青少年(10-18 岁)[PE(n=90)和 PC(n=90)]和 90 名年龄匹配的 HC。对每位参与者评估以下参数:临床参数、胸部外观感知(PAC)、身体功能(握力、柔韧性、肌肉力量、耐力、身体活动)、姿势、心理社会状况和生活质量(QOL)。
与 HC 组相比,PE 和 PC 患者的体重较低,姿势较差,身体功能评分较低(p<0.001,全部)。与 HC 和 PC(除 QOL 外)组相比,PE 组在某些心理社会状况和生活质量子量表上的评分较低(p<0.05)。与 PE 组相比,PC 组的姿势较差(p<0.05)。PAC 与身体功能和心理社会状况相关(r=0.19-0.40,p<0.05),但胸廓畸形严重程度与这些参数无关(r=0.02-0.12,p>0.05)。
我们的结果表明,所有患有轻度、中度或重度胸廓畸形的青少年都应接受生物心理社会评估,获得心理社会支持,并转介进行物理治疗。