From California State University Los Angeles, Department of Communication Studies, Los Angeles CA, USA.
From University of Memphis, Department of Communication and Film, Memphis TN, USA.
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Mar;104(3):438-451. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.031. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
Communication related to COVID-19 between provider and the patient/family is impacted by isolation requirements, time limitations, and lack of family/partner access. Our goal was to determine the content of provider communication resources and peer-reviewed articles on COVID-19 communication in order to identify opportunities for developing future COVID-19 communication curricula and support tools.
A systematic review was conducted using the UpToDate clinical decision support resource database, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science. The grey literature review was conducted in September 2020 and articles published between January-September 2020 written in English were included.
A total of 89 sources were included in the review, (n = 36 provider communication resources, n = 53 peer-reviewed articles). Resources were available for all providers, mainly physicians, and consisted of general approaches to COVID-19 communication with care planning as the most common topic. Only four resources met best practices for patient-centered communication. All but three articles described physician communication where a general emphasis on patient communication was the most prevalent topic. Reduced communication channels, absence of family, time, burnout, telemedicine, and reduced patient-centered care were identified as communication barriers. Communication facilitators were team communication, time, patient-centered and family communication, and available training resources.
Overall, resources lack content that address non-physician providers, communication with family, and strategies for telehealth communication to promote family engagement. The gaps identified in this review reveal a need to develop more materials on the following topics: provider moral distress, prevention communication, empathy and compassion, and grief and bereavement. An evidence-base and theoretical grounding in communication theory is also needed.
Future development of COVID-19 communication resources for providers should address members of the interdisciplinary team, communication with family, engagement strategies for culturally-sensitive telehealth interactions, and support for provider moral distress.
由于隔离要求、时间限制以及缺乏家属/伴侣的访问权限,医患/家属之间与 COVID-19 相关的沟通受到影响。我们的目标是确定有关 COVID-19 沟通的提供者沟通资源和同行评议文章的内容,以确定开发未来 COVID-19 沟通课程和支持工具的机会。
使用 UpToDate 临床决策支持资源数据库、CINAHL、PubMed、PsycInfo 和 Web of Science 进行系统评价。2020 年 9 月进行了灰色文献综述,纳入了 2020 年 1 月至 9 月以英文发表的文章。
共有 89 个来源纳入了综述(n=36 个提供者沟通资源,n=53 篇同行评议文章)。资源可用于所有提供者,主要是医生,内容包括与 COVID-19 护理计划相关的一般沟通方法,最常见的主题是沟通方法。只有四个资源符合以患者为中心的沟通最佳实践。除了三篇文章描述了医生沟通外,其他文章都普遍强调了患者沟通。沟通障碍包括沟通渠道减少、家属不在、时间、倦怠、远程医疗和以患者为中心的护理减少。沟通促进因素包括团队沟通、时间、以患者为中心和家庭沟通,以及可用的培训资源。
总体而言,资源缺乏针对非医师提供者、与家属沟通以及远程医疗沟通促进家属参与的策略的内容。本综述中发现的差距表明需要开发更多有关以下主题的材料:提供者道德困境、预防沟通、同理心和同情心以及悲伤和丧亲。还需要在沟通理论方面具有循证和理论基础。
未来应针对跨学科团队成员、与家属的沟通、以文化敏感为重点的远程医疗互动的参与策略以及提供者道德困境来开发 COVID-19 沟通资源。