Department of Human Perception Action and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
TNO Soesterberg, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0245295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245295. eCollection 2021.
Illusory self-motion often provokes motion sickness, which is commonly explained in terms of an inter-sensory conflict that is not in accordance with previous experience. Here we address the influence of cognition in motion sickness and show that such a conflict is not provocative when the observer believes that the motion illusion is indeed actually occurring. Illusory self-motion and motion sickness were elicited in healthy human participants who were seated on a stationary rotary chair inside a rotating optokinetic drum. Participants knew that both chair and drum could rotate but were unaware of the actual motion stimulus. Results showed that motion sickness was correlated with the discrepancy between participants' perceived self-motion and participants' beliefs about the actual motion. Together with the general motion sickness susceptibility, this discrepancy accounted for 51% of the variance in motion sickness intensity. This finding sheds a new light on the causes of visually induced motion sickness and suggests that it is not governed by an inter-sensory conflict per se, but by beliefs concerning the actual self-motion. This cognitive influence provides a promising tool for the development of new countermeasures.
虚幻的运动常常会引起运动病,通常解释为一种与先前经验不符的感觉冲突。在这里,我们探讨了认知在运动病中的影响,并表明当观察者相信运动错觉确实在发生时,这种冲突并不会引起运动病。我们让健康的人类参与者坐在旋转视动仪内的一个固定旋转椅上,以诱发虚幻的运动和运动病。参与者知道椅子和鼓都可以旋转,但不知道实际的运动刺激。结果表明,运动病与参与者感知到的自身运动与参与者对实际运动的信念之间的差异有关。这种差异与一般的运动病易感性一起,解释了运动病强度变化的 51%。这一发现为视觉诱导的运动病的病因提供了新的视角,并表明它不是由感觉冲突本身决定的,而是由对实际自身运动的信念决定的。这种认知影响为开发新的对策提供了一个有前途的工具。