• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠病毒感染患者的嗅觉功能和病毒恢复情况。

Olfactory function and viral recovery in COVID-19.

机构信息

Neurology Unit, OCB Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Modena, Italy.

Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Science, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2021 Mar;11(3):e02006. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2006. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.2006
PMID:33465295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7994699/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Olfactory and taste disorders were reported in up to 30%-80% of COVID-19 patients. The purpose of our study was to objectively assess smell impairment in COVID-19 patients and to correlate olfactory function with viral recovery.

METHODS

Between 15 and 30 April 2020, hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent an objective assessment of olfactory function with the Smell Identification subtest of the Sniffin' Sticks Test (SI-SST). Association between viral recovery and SI-SST performance was evaluated.

RESULTS

51 patients were enrolled (49% males, mean age 66.2 ± 14.6 years). At the time of test administration, 45% were clinically recovered and 39% were virus-free. Objective hyposmia/anosmia was found in 45% of the patients. Subjective olfactory disorders showed no association with the clinical or viral recovery status of the patients. On the contrary, none of the patients with anosmia and the 5% of hyposmic patients at test had viral recovery. The relative risk for hyposmic patients to be still positive at swab test was 10.323 (95% CI 1.483-71.869, p < .0001). Logistic regression analysis showed an independent and significant correlation between viral clearance and SI-SST scores (OR = 2.242; 95% CI 1.322-3.802, p < .003). ROC curve analysis confirmed that a SI-SST > 10.5 predicts viral clearance with 79% sensitivity and 87% specificity (AUC = 0.883).

CONCLUSION

Hyposmia is part of COVID-19 symptoms; however, only objectively assessed olfactory function is associated with viral recovery. SI-SST is an easy and safe instrument, and further large multicentric studies should assess its value to predict infection and recovery.

摘要

背景

多达 30%-80%的 COVID-19 患者报告有嗅觉和味觉障碍。我们研究的目的是客观评估 COVID-19 患者的嗅觉障碍,并将嗅觉功能与病毒恢复相关联。

方法

在 2020 年 4 月 15 日至 30 日期间,住院的确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者接受了 Sniffin' Sticks 测试(SI-SST)的嗅觉识别子测试(SI-SST)的客观嗅觉功能评估。评估了病毒恢复与 SI-SST 表现之间的关联。

结果

共纳入 51 例患者(49%为男性,平均年龄 66.2±14.6 岁)。在测试时,45%的患者临床康复,39%的患者病毒载量为零。45%的患者存在客观嗅觉减退/丧失。主观嗅觉障碍与患者的临床或病毒恢复状况无相关性。相反,嗅觉丧失的患者中无一例病毒恢复,嗅觉减退患者中也仅有 5%的患者病毒恢复。嗅觉减退患者在拭子检测中仍为阳性的相对风险为 10.323(95%可信区间 1.483-71.869,p<0.0001)。逻辑回归分析显示,病毒清除与 SI-SST 评分之间存在独立且显著的相关性(OR=2.242;95%可信区间 1.322-3.802,p<0.003)。ROC 曲线分析证实,SI-SST>10.5 可预测病毒清除,灵敏度为 79%,特异性为 87%(AUC=0.883)。

结论

嗅觉减退是 COVID-19 症状的一部分;然而,只有客观评估的嗅觉功能与病毒恢复相关。SI-SST 是一种简单、安全的仪器,应进一步进行大型多中心研究来评估其预测感染和恢复的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b52f/7994699/585e43255f1a/BRB3-11-e02006-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b52f/7994699/585e43255f1a/BRB3-11-e02006-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b52f/7994699/585e43255f1a/BRB3-11-e02006-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Olfactory function and viral recovery in COVID-19.新冠病毒感染患者的嗅觉功能和病毒恢复情况。
Brain Behav. 2021 Mar;11(3):e02006. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2006. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Smell Status in Children Infected with SARS-CoV-2.儿童感染 SARS-CoV-2 后的嗅觉状态。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Aug;131(8):E2475-E2480. doi: 10.1002/lary.29403. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
3
Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction persistence after COVID-19: a prospective study.新冠病毒感染后嗅觉功能障碍持续时间的评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Feb;26(3):1042-1048. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202202_28014.
4
Gaining Back What Is Lost: Recovering the Sense of Smell in Mild to Moderate Patients After COVID-19.重拾失去的嗅觉:新冠康复患者中轻度至中度嗅觉丧失的嗅觉恢复。
Chem Senses. 2020 Dec 5;45(9):875-881. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa066.
5
Prevalence and Prognostic Factors Associated with Early Recovery of Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients.新冠病毒感染患者嗅觉功能障碍早期恢复的患病率及相关预后因素
Ear Nose Throat J. 2024 Jun;103(1_suppl):68S-75S. doi: 10.1177/01455613231202207. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
6
Presence of gustatory and olfactory dysfunction in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间存在味觉和嗅觉功能障碍。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 26;21(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06294-2.
7
COVID-19: Recovery from Chemosensory Dysfunction. A Multicentre study on Smell and Taste.COVID-19:化学感觉功能障碍的恢复。一项关于嗅觉和味觉的多中心研究。
Laryngoscope. 2021 May;131(5):1095-1100. doi: 10.1002/lary.29383. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
8
Olfactory dysfunction in patients after recovering from COVID-19.新冠康复患者的嗅觉功能障碍
Acta Otolaryngol. 2020 Dec;140(12):1032-1035. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2020.1811999. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
9
[Loss of smell, a preliminary indicator of COVID-19].[嗅觉丧失,新冠病毒病的一个初步指标]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2021 Feb 2;59(1):4-6. doi: 10.24875/RMIMSS.M21000046.
10
Objective Sensory Testing Methods Reveal a Higher Prevalence of Olfactory Loss in COVID-19-Positive Patients Compared to Subjective Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.目的:与主观方法相比,客观感觉测试方法显示 COVID-19 阳性患者的嗅觉丧失发生率更高:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chem Senses. 2020 Dec 5;45(9):865-874. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa064.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurologic complications of coronavirus and other respiratory viral infections.冠状病毒和其他呼吸道病毒感染的神经系统并发症。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2022;189:331-358. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-91532-8.00004-5.
2
Iranian Smell Diagnostic Test in Covid-19 Disease; Report of Covid-19 Center of North of Iran.伊朗新冠病毒疾病嗅觉诊断测试;伊朗北部新冠病毒中心报告
Caspian J Intern Med. 2022;13(Suppl 3):204-210. doi: 10.22088/cjim.13.0.204.

本文引用的文献

1
Objective Sensory Testing Methods Reveal a Higher Prevalence of Olfactory Loss in COVID-19-Positive Patients Compared to Subjective Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.目的:与主观方法相比,客观感觉测试方法显示 COVID-19 阳性患者的嗅觉丧失发生率更高:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chem Senses. 2020 Dec 5;45(9):865-874. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa064.
2
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Alteration of the Brain in a Patient With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Anosmia.一名2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)合并嗅觉丧失患者的脑磁共振成像改变
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Aug 1;77(8):1028-1029. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2125.
3
Neuropathogenesis and Neurologic Manifestations of the Coronaviruses in the Age of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Review.
新型冠状病毒病 2019 时代冠状病毒的神经发病机制和神经表现:综述。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Aug 1;77(8):1018-1027. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2065.
4
The role of self-reported smell and taste disorders in suspected COVID‑19.自我报告的嗅觉和味觉障碍在疑似 COVID-19 中的作用。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Sep;277(9):2625-2630. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06069-6. Epub 2020 May 23.
5
Acute-onset smell and taste disorders in the context of COVID-19: a pilot multicentre polymerase chain reaction based case-control study.COVID-19 相关的急性嗅觉味觉障碍:一项基于多中心聚合酶链反应的病例对照初步研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2020 Sep;27(9):1738-1741. doi: 10.1111/ene.14273. Epub 2020 May 16.
6
Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a multicenter European study.嗅觉和味觉障碍作为冠状病毒病(COVID-19)轻至中度形式的临床特征:一项多中心欧洲研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Aug;277(8):2251-2261. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05965-1. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
7
Self-reported Olfactory and Taste Disorders in Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus 2 Infection: A Cross-sectional Study.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染患者的自我报告嗅觉和味觉障碍:一项横断面研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):889-890. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa330.
8
Updated Sniffin' Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects.基于9139名受试者的扩展样本更新的嗅觉棒常模数据。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;276(3):719-728. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5248-1. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
9
Sensory-specific impairment among older people. An investigation using both sensory thresholds and subjective measures across the five senses.老年人的感觉特异性障碍。一项使用五种感觉的感觉阈值和主观测量的综合研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 27;13(8):e0202969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202969. eCollection 2018.
10
Position paper on olfactory dysfunction.关于嗅觉功能障碍的立场文件。
Rhinol Suppl. 2017 Mar;54(26):1-30. doi: 10.4193/Rhino16.248.