• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体-基台界面不同封闭材料抗菌效果及渗透性的评估——一项体外初步研究

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Permeability of Various Sealing Materials at the Implant-Abutment Interface-A Pilot In Vitro Study.

作者信息

Smojver Igor, Vuletić Marko, Gerbl Dražena, Budimir Ana, Sušić Mato, Gabrić Dragana

机构信息

DDM, Private Hospital St. Catherine, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.

DDM, Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 14;14(2):385. doi: 10.3390/ma14020385.

DOI:10.3390/ma14020385
PMID:33466846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7830056/
Abstract

The microenvironment of the oral cavity is altered when an implant, a biocompatible foreign body, is inserted into the mouth. Bacteria settle in the tissues in and around the implant due to the passage of microorganisms through the microgap at the connection of the implant and prosthetic abutment. To prevent colonization of the implant by microorganisms, one idea is to use sealing and antimicrobial materials to decontaminate the implant-abutment interface and close the microgap. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy and permeability of different types of sealing materials at the implant-abutment interface, under static conditions. Three different sealing material (GapSeal gel, Oxysafe gel and Flow.sil) were used for sealing the implant-abutment interfaces in 60 titanium dental implants, which were first contaminated with a solution containing and for 14 days under an aerobic condition. Results showed that a complete seal against bacterial infection was not formed at the implant-abutment interface, while for fungal infections, only GapSeal material helped to prevent microleakage. Findings of this in vitro study reported that application of sealing material before abutment connection may reduce peri-implant bacterial and fungal population compared with the interface without sealing material.

摘要

当将作为生物相容性异物的种植体植入口腔时,口腔的微环境会发生改变。由于微生物通过种植体与修复基台连接处的微间隙,细菌会在种植体及其周围的组织中定植。为防止微生物在种植体上定植,一种想法是使用密封和抗菌材料对种植体-基台界面进行去污并封闭微间隙。本研究的目的是在静态条件下评估不同类型密封材料在种植体-基台界面的抗菌效果和渗透性。三种不同的密封材料(GapSeal凝胶、Oxysafe凝胶和Flow.sil)用于密封60颗钛牙种植体的种植体-基台界面,这些种植体首先在有氧条件下用含有 和 的溶液污染14天。结果表明,在种植体-基台界面未形成完全防止细菌感染的密封,而对于真菌感染,只有GapSeal材料有助于防止微渗漏。这项体外研究的结果报告称,与未使用密封材料的界面相比,在连接基台之前应用密封材料可能会减少种植体周围的细菌和真菌数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/a7ee73244458/materials-14-00385-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/68c05597b3d7/materials-14-00385-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/dd3d23bfef75/materials-14-00385-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/d8a1523c574c/materials-14-00385-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/5b27a1d48942/materials-14-00385-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/607da62b941a/materials-14-00385-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/e95077b63cf7/materials-14-00385-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/2101f36cd868/materials-14-00385-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/e24ba25b4029/materials-14-00385-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/b2d5be684d0d/materials-14-00385-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/e46a56b874ff/materials-14-00385-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/a7ee73244458/materials-14-00385-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/68c05597b3d7/materials-14-00385-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/dd3d23bfef75/materials-14-00385-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/d8a1523c574c/materials-14-00385-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/5b27a1d48942/materials-14-00385-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/607da62b941a/materials-14-00385-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/e95077b63cf7/materials-14-00385-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/2101f36cd868/materials-14-00385-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/e24ba25b4029/materials-14-00385-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/b2d5be684d0d/materials-14-00385-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/e46a56b874ff/materials-14-00385-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b67/7830056/a7ee73244458/materials-14-00385-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Permeability of Various Sealing Materials at the Implant-Abutment Interface-A Pilot In Vitro Study.种植体-基台界面不同封闭材料抗菌效果及渗透性的评估——一项体外初步研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 14;14(2):385. doi: 10.3390/ma14020385.
2
Antimicrobial Efficacy and Permeability of Various Sealing Materials in Two Different Types of Implant-Abutment Connections.不同类型种植体-基台连接中各种密封材料的抗菌效果和渗透性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jul 21;23(14):8031. doi: 10.3390/ijms23148031.
3
Sealing Efficacy of the Original and Third-Party Custom-Made Abutments-Microbiological In Vitro Pilot Study.原装与第三方定制基台的封闭效果——微生物体外初步研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 21;15(4):1597. doi: 10.3390/ma15041597.
4
Microgap and bacterial microleakage during the osseointegration period: An in vitro assessment of the cover screw and healing abutment in a platform-switched implant system.在骨整合期的微间隙和细菌微渗漏:一种在平台转换种植体系统中对覆盖螺丝和愈合基台的体外评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Jul;130(1):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.07.030. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
5
Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.评估在不同螺钉扭矩值下种植体与钛和氧化锆基台对牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌和具核梭杆菌的封闭能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
6
Efficacy of antibacterial sealing gel and O-ring to prevent microleakage at the implant abutment interface: an in vitro study.抗菌封闭凝胶和O形环预防种植体基台界面微渗漏的效果:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Feb;40(1):11-4. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00167. Epub 2011 May 16.
7
A new system of implant abutment connection: how to improve a two piece implant system sealing.一种新型种植体基台连接系统:如何改善两件式种植体系统的密封性。
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2017 Nov 30;10(3):234-240. doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.3.234. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
8
Sealing effectiveness against Staphylococcus aureus of five different implant-abutment connections.五种不同种植体-基台连接对金黄色葡萄球菌的封闭效果
Am J Dent. 2018 Jun;31(3):141-143.
9
Microgap and microleakage of a hybrid connection platform-switched implant system in the absence or presence of a silicone-based sealing agent.混合连接平台切换种植体系统在有无硅基密封剂条件下的微间隙和微渗漏。
Odontology. 2022 Apr;110(2):231-239. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00652-x. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
10
Characteristics of implant-CAD/CAM abutment connections of two different internal connection systems.两种不同内连接系统种植体- CAD/CAM 基台连接的特点。
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 May;39(5):391-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02273.x. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Bacterial Detection, Deformation, and Torque Loss on Dental Implants with Different Tapered Connections Compared with External Hexagon Connection after Thermomechanical Cycling.热机械循环后,与外六角连接相比,不同锥形连接的牙种植体上的细菌检测、变形和扭矩损失
Materials (Basel). 2023 May 23;16(11):3904. doi: 10.3390/ma16113904.
2
Should the vent hole of posterior implant crowns be placed on the lateral surface? An in vitro study of the hydrodynamic feature of cement extrusion and retention ability.后牙种植体冠的通气孔应置于侧面吗?——一种关于挤出水泥的流体动力特征和保持能力的体外研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0276198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276198. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Peri-implant health.种植体周围健康。
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S249-S256. doi: 10.1002/JPER.16-0424.
2
Non-Surgical Therapy for Peri-Implant Diseases: a Systematic Review.种植体周围疾病的非手术治疗:一项系统综述
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016 Sep 9;7(3):e13. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2016.7313. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
3
Microbial Profiles and Detection Techniques in Peri-Implant Diseases: a Systematic Review.种植体周围疾病中的微生物概况与检测技术:一项系统综述
Evaluation of sealing efficacy and removal convenience of sealing materials for implant abutment screw access holes.
评价种植体基台螺丝孔封闭材料的密封效果和去除便利性。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Aug 25;22(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02403-y.
4
Antimicrobial Efficacy and Permeability of Various Sealing Materials in Two Different Types of Implant-Abutment Connections.不同类型种植体-基台连接中各种密封材料的抗菌效果和渗透性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jul 21;23(14):8031. doi: 10.3390/ijms23148031.
5
Bacterial Microleakage at the Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study.种植体-基台界面处的细菌微渗漏:一项体外研究。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Jun 26;9(7):277. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9070277.
6
Effectiveness of Different Antimicrobial Agents on Malodor Prevention in Two-Stage Dental Implants: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.不同抗菌剂对两段式牙种植体防臭效果的研究:一项双盲随机临床试验
Eur J Dent. 2023 May;17(2):524-529. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1747954. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
7
Sealing Efficacy of the Original and Third-Party Custom-Made Abutments-Microbiological In Vitro Pilot Study.原装与第三方定制基台的封闭效果——微生物体外初步研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 21;15(4):1597. doi: 10.3390/ma15041597.
8
Ozone Gel in Chronic Periodontal Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial on the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Ozone Application.臭氧凝胶用于慢性牙周炎:一项关于臭氧应用抗炎效果的随机临床试验
Biology (Basel). 2021 Jul 6;10(7):625. doi: 10.3390/biology10070625.
9
Novel dental implant modifications with two-staged double benefits for preventing infection and promoting osseointegration and .具有预防感染和促进骨整合双重益处的新型两阶段牙科种植体改良
Bioact Mater. 2021 May 15;6(12):4568-4579. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.041. eCollection 2021 Dec.
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016 Sep 9;7(3):e10. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2016.7310. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
4
Real-time PCR analysis of fungal organisms and bacterial species at peri-implantitis sites.种植体周围炎部位真菌和细菌种类的实时聚合酶链反应分析
Int J Implant Dent. 2015 Dec;1(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40729-015-0010-6. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
5
Transfer of Bacteria into the Internal Cavity of Dental Implants After Application of Disinfectant or Sealant Agents In Vitro.体外应用消毒剂或封闭剂后细菌向牙种植体内腔的转移
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):563-70. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4408.
6
The Microbiologic Profile Associated with Peri-Implantitis in Humans: A Systematic Review.人类种植体周围炎相关的微生物学概况:一项系统评价
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):359-68. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4150. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
7
Implant surface material, design, and osseointegration.种植体表面材料、设计与骨结合
Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Apr;59(2):505-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
8
Bacterial Colonization of the Implant-Abutment Interface (IAI) of Dental Implants with a Sloped Marginal Design: An in-vitro Study.倾斜边缘设计的牙种植体种植体-基台界面(IAI)的细菌定植:一项体外研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Feb;18(1):161-7. doi: 10.1111/cid.12287. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
9
Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology.种植体周围健康与疾病。当前流行病学的系统评价。
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42 Suppl 16:S158-71. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12334.
10
Assessment of periodontal and opportunistic flora in patients with peri-implantitis.种植体周炎患者牙周及机会性菌群的评估。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Aug;26(8):937-941. doi: 10.1111/clr.12387. Epub 2014 Apr 10.