Suppr超能文献

在常规急诊科护理中实施急性老年患者(APOP)筛查计划:一项前后对照研究。

Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care : A before-after study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, section Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Mar;54(2):113-121. doi: 10.1007/s00391-020-01837-9. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program for older patients in routine emergency department (ED) care shortly after implementation.

METHODS

We conducted an implementation study with before-after design, using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model for quality improvement, in the ED of a Dutch academic hospital. All consecutive patients ≥ 70 years during 2 months before and after implementation were included. The APOP program comprises screening for risk of functional decline, mortality and cognitive impairment, targeted interventions for high-risk patients and education of professionals. Outcome measures were compliance with interventions and impact on ED process, length of stay (LOS) and hospital admission rate.

RESULTS

Two comparable groups of patients (median age 77 years) were included before (n = 920) and after (n = 953) implementation. After implementation 560 (59%) patients were screened of which 190 (34%) were high-risk patients. Some of the program interventions for high-risk patients in the ED were adhered to, some were not. More hospitalized patients received comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) after implementation (21% before vs. 31% after; p = 0.002). In 89% of high-risk patients who were discharged to home, telephone follow-up was initiated. Implementation did not influence median ED LOS (202 min before vs. 196 min after; p = 0.152) or hospital admission rate (40% before vs. 39% after; p = 0.410).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the APOP screening program in routine ED care did not negatively impact the ED process and resulted in an increase of CGA and telephone follow-up in older patients. Future studies should investigate whether sustainable changes in management and patient outcomes occur after more PDSA cycles.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在常规急诊部(ED)护理中实施急性老年患者(APOP)筛查计划后不久对老年患者的影响。

方法

我们在荷兰一家学术医院的 ED 进行了一项前后设计的实施研究,使用计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)模型进行质量改进。在实施前后的 2 个月内,所有连续的≥70 岁患者均纳入研究。APOP 计划包括筛查功能下降、死亡和认知障碍的风险,对高危患者进行靶向干预以及对专业人员进行教育。观察指标包括干预措施的依从性和对 ED 流程、住院率的影响。

结果

纳入了实施前后两组可比的患者(中位数年龄 77 岁),分别为 920 例和 953 例。实施后,共筛查出 560 例(59%)患者,其中 190 例(34%)为高危患者。ED 中针对高危患者的一些计划干预措施得到了执行,而有些则没有。实施后更多的住院患者接受了全面老年评估(CGA)(21% vs. 31%;p=0.002)。在出院回家的高危患者中,89%的患者进行了电话随访。实施前后 ED 中位数 LOS 无显著差异(202 分钟 vs. 196 分钟;p=0.152)或住院率(40% vs. 39%;p=0.410)。

结论

在常规 ED 护理中实施 APOP 筛查计划不会对 ED 流程产生负面影响,并增加了对老年患者的 CGA 和电话随访。未来的研究应调查在更多的 PDSA 循环后是否会出现管理和患者结局的可持续变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3433/7946672/45ddee3ed1dc/391_2020_1837_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验