Ealing Hospital, London, UK
Ealing Hospital, London, UK.
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Jan;21(1):e14-e19. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0576.
The objective was to explore if chest X-ray severity, assessed using a validated scoring system, predicts patient outcome on admission and when starting continuous positive pressure ventilation (CPAP) for COVID-19.
The study was a retrospective case-controlled study.
There were 163 patients with COVID-19 deemed candidates for CPAP on admission, including 58 who subsequently required CPAP.
On admission, we measured the proportion of patients meeting a composite 'negative' outcome of requiring CPAP, intubation or dying versus successful ward-based care. For those escalated to CPAP, 'negative' outcomes were intubation or death versus successful de-escalation of respiratory support.
Our results were stratified into tertiles, those with 'moderate' or 'severe' X-rays on admission had significantly higher odds of negative outcome versus 'mild' (odds ratio (OR) 2.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.121-4.803; p=0.023; and OR 3.600; 95% CI 1.681-7.708; p=0.001, respectively). This could not be demonstrated in those commencing CPAP (OR 0.976; 95% CI 0.754-1.264; p=0.856).
We outline a scoring system to stratify X-rays by severity and directly link this to prognosis. However, we were unable to demonstrate this association in the patients commencing CPAP.
本研究旨在探讨使用经过验证的评分系统评估的胸部 X 射线严重程度是否可预测 COVID-19 患者入院时和开始持续气道正压通气(CPAP)时的预后。
本研究为回顾性病例对照研究。
共有 163 名 COVID-19 患者被认为适合入院时接受 CPAP,其中 58 名患者随后需要 CPAP。
入院时,我们测量了符合 CPAP、插管或死亡复合“阴性”结局的患者比例与成功的基于病房的护理相比。对于那些升级为 CPAP 的患者,“阴性”结局为插管或死亡与呼吸支持的成功降级相比。
我们的结果分层为三分位数,入院时 X 射线显示“中度”或“重度”的患者与“轻度”相比,发生阴性结局的可能性显著更高(比值比(OR)2.32;95%置信区间(CI)1.121-4.803;p=0.023;和 OR 3.600;95% CI 1.681-7.708;p=0.001)。在开始使用 CPAP 的患者中,这一点无法得到证明(OR 0.976;95% CI 0.754-1.264;p=0.856)。
我们提出了一种评分系统,根据严重程度对 X 射线进行分层,并直接将其与预后联系起来。然而,我们未能在开始使用 CPAP 的患者中证明这种关联。