Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
School of Psychological Science, The University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0244827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244827. eCollection 2021.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many Governments are instituting mobile tracking technologies to perform rapid contact tracing. However, these technologies are only effective if the public is willing to use them, implying that their perceived public health benefits must outweigh personal concerns over privacy and security. The Australian federal government recently launched the 'COVIDSafe' app, designed to anonymously register nearby contacts. If a contact later identifies as infected with COVID-19, health department officials can rapidly followup with their registered contacts to stop the virus' spread. The current study assessed attitudes towards three tracking technologies (telecommunication network tracking, a government app, and Apple and Google's Bluetooth exposure notification system) in two representative samples of the Australian public prior to the launch of COVIDSafe. We compared these attitudes to usage of the COVIDSafe app after its launch in a further two representative samples of the Australian public. Using Bayesian methods, we find widespread acceptance for all tracking technologies, however, observe a large intention-behaviour gap between people's stated attitudes and actual uptake of the COVIDSafe app. We consider the policy implications of these results for Australia and the world at large.
针对 COVID-19 大流行,许多政府正在采用移动追踪技术来进行快速接触者追踪。然而,如果公众愿意使用这些技术,它们才会有效,这意味着它们被认为对公众健康的好处必须超过个人对隐私和安全的担忧。澳大利亚联邦政府最近推出了“COVIDSafe”应用程序,旨在匿名登记附近的接触者。如果后来有接触者被确认为感染了 COVID-19,卫生部门官员可以迅速联系他们登记的接触者,以阻止病毒传播。本研究在 COVIDSafe 推出之前,在澳大利亚的两个代表性样本中,对三种追踪技术(电信网络追踪、政府应用程序以及苹果和谷歌的蓝牙接触通知系统)的态度进行了评估。在 COVIDSafe 推出后,我们在澳大利亚的另外两个代表性样本中比较了这些态度与该应用程序的使用情况。使用贝叶斯方法,我们发现所有追踪技术都得到了广泛的认可,但在人们对 COVIDSafe 应用程序的态度和实际使用之间存在着很大的意图-行为差距。我们考虑了这些结果对澳大利亚和全世界的政策影响。