Sturgill Daniel A, Bal Naveet, Nagavally Sneha, Wolfgram Dawn F
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Kidney Dis (Basel). 2020 Sep;6(5):364-370. doi: 10.1159/000508919. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
The impact of achieving hemodialysis laboratory and hemodynamic quality metrics on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is unknown.
To determine if meeting dialysis laboratory quality of care measures is associated with improved PROs.
In this cross-sectional study, we measured the relationship between dialysis patients' Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores and commonly used dialysis quality of care measures.
PROMIS surveys were administered to 92 dialysis patients. The mean ± SD scores demonstrated higher fatigue (55.0 ± 9.8) and lower physical function (37.9 ± 7.9) but similar cognition (50.3 ± 10.9) compared to general population normative scores of 50 ± 10. Dialysis patients meeting Kt/V goals had no better scores than those who did not. Meeting the hemoglobin (Hgb) value of ≥10 g/dL was associated with a lower fatigue score, but no difference in cognitive or physical function scores. Meeting the serum albumin goal of ≥4.0 mg/dL was associated with a higher physical function score but made no difference for cognitive function or fatigue score. As a continuous variable, a higher Hgb was associated with lower reported fatigue (HR -1.74 95%, CI [-3.09, -0.39]), but no other measures were associated with PRO scores when adjusted for demographics and comorbidities.
We found little association between measures currently used to assess the quality of dialysis care and PROs. Encouraging improved utilization of PROs and incorporating PROs into quality measurements might give a more robust assessment of quality of care. Future studies should assess the benefits of this approach.
实现血液透析实验室及血流动力学质量指标对患者报告结局(PROs)的影响尚不清楚。
确定达到透析实验室护理质量指标是否与改善的PROs相关。
在这项横断面研究中,我们测量了透析患者的患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)评分与常用透析护理质量指标之间的关系。
对92例透析患者进行了PROMIS调查。与一般人群标准评分50±10相比,平均±标准差评分显示疲劳程度更高(55.0±9.8),身体功能更低(37.9±7.9),但认知能力相似(50.3±10.9)。达到Kt/V目标的透析患者的评分并不比未达到目标的患者更好。血红蛋白(Hgb)值≥10 g/dL与较低的疲劳评分相关,但认知或身体功能评分无差异。达到血清白蛋白目标≥4.0 mg/dL与较高的身体功能评分相关,但对认知功能或疲劳评分无影响。作为连续变量,较高的Hgb与较低的报告疲劳相关(风险比-1.74,95%置信区间[-3.09,-0.39]),但在调整人口统计学和合并症后,没有其他指标与PRO评分相关。
我们发现目前用于评估透析护理质量的指标与PROs之间几乎没有关联。鼓励更好地利用PROs并将其纳入质量测量可能会对护理质量进行更有力的评估。未来的研究应评估这种方法的益处。