Global Health Programme, Chatham House, London, UK
Global Health Programme, Chatham House, London, UK.
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jan;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004227.
The COVID-19 epidemic is the latest evidence of critical gaps in our collective ability to monitor country-level preparedness for health emergencies. The global frameworks that exist to strengthen core public health capacities lack coverage of several preparedness domains and do not provide mechanisms to interface with local intelligence. We designed and piloted a process, in collaboration with three National Public Health Institutes (NPHIs) in Ethiopia, Nigeria and Pakistan, to identify potential preparedness indicators that exist in a myriad of frameworks and tools in varying local institutions. Following a desk-based systematic search and expert consultations, indicators were extracted from existing national and subnational health security-relevant frameworks and prioritised in a multi-stakeholder two-round Delphi process. Eighty-six indicators in Ethiopia, 87 indicators in Nigeria and 51 indicators in Pakistan were assessed to be valid, relevant and feasible. From these, 14-16 indicators were prioritised in each of the three countries for consideration in monitoring and evaluation tools. Priority indicators consistently included private sector metrics, subnational capacities, availability and capacity for electronic surveillance, measures of timeliness for routine reporting, data quality scores and data related to internally displaced persons and returnees. NPHIs play an increasingly central role in health security and must have access to data needed to identify and respond rapidly to public health threats. Collecting and collating local sources of information may prove essential to addressing gaps; it is a necessary step towards improving preparedness and strengthening international health regulations compliance.
COVID-19 疫情是我们监测国家一级卫生应急准备能力的集体能力存在重大差距的最新证据。现有的加强核心公共卫生能力的全球框架缺乏对若干备灾领域的涵盖,也没有提供与地方情报接轨的机制。我们与埃塞俄比亚、尼日利亚和巴基斯坦的三个国家公共卫生研究所合作,设计并试行一个流程,以确定存在于各种框架和工具中的潜在备灾指标,这些框架和工具存在于不同的地方机构中。在进行基于桌面的系统搜索和专家协商后,从现有的国家和次国家卫生安全相关框架中提取指标,并在多利益攸关方两轮德尔菲过程中对其进行优先排序。在埃塞俄比亚评估了 86 项指标,在尼日利亚评估了 87 项指标,在巴基斯坦评估了 51 项指标,这些指标被认为是有效、相关和可行的。在这三个国家中,每个国家都有 14-16 项指标被优先考虑纳入监测和评估工具。优先指标始终包括私营部门指标、次国家能力、电子监测的可用性和能力、常规报告的及时性措施、数据质量评分以及与境内流离失所者和返回者有关的数据。国家公共卫生研究所在卫生安全方面发挥着越来越核心的作用,必须能够获得识别和迅速应对公共卫生威胁所需的数据。收集和整理地方信息来源可能对解决差距至关重要;这是改善备灾能力和加强国际卫生条例遵守情况的必要步骤。