Keating C, Bolton-Warberg M, Hinchcliffe J, Davies R, Whelan S, Wan A H L, Fitzgerald R D, Davies S J, Ijaz U Z, Smith C J
Department of Microbiology, School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
Water and Environment Group, Infrastructure and Environment Division, James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8LT, UK.
Anim Microbiome. 2021 Jan 7;3(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s42523-020-00065-1.
Aquaculture successfully meets global food demands for many fish species. However, aquaculture production of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) is just 2.5% of total market production. For cod farming to be a viable economic venture specific challenges on how to increase growth, health and farming productivity need to be addressed. Feed ingredients play a key role here. Macroalgae (seaweeds) have been suggested as a functional feed supplement with both health and economic benefits for terrestrial farmed animals and fish. The impact of such dietary supplements to cod gut integrity and microbiota, which contribute to overall fish robustness is unknown. The objective of this study was to supplement the diet of juvenile Atlantic cod with macroalgae and determine the impacts on fish condition and growth, gut morphology and hindgut microbiota composition (16S rRNA amplicon sequencing). Fish were fed one of three diets: control (no macroalgal inclusion), 10% inclusion of either egg wrack (Ascophyllum nodosum) or sea lettuce (Ulva rigida) macroalgae in a 12-week trial.
The results demonstrated there was no significant difference in fish condition, gut morphology or hindgut microbiota between the U. rigida supplemented fish group and the control group at any time-point. This trend was not observed with the A. nodosum treatment. Fish within this group were further categorised as either 'Normal' or 'Lower Growth'. 'Lower Growth' individuals found the diet unpalatable resulting in reduced weight and condition factor combined with an altered gut morphology and microbiome relative to the other treatments. Excluding this group, our results show that the hindgut microbiota was largely driven by temporal pressures with the microbial communities becoming more similar over time irrespective of dietary treatment. The core microbiome at the final time-point consisted of the orders Vibrionales (Vibrio and Photobacterium), Bacteroidales (Bacteroidetes and Macellibacteroides) and Clostridiales (Lachnoclostridium).
Our study indicates that U. rigida macroalgae can be supplemented at 10% inclusion levels in the diet of juvenile farmed Atlantic cod without any impact on fish condition or hindgut microbial community structure. We also conclude that 10% dietary inclusion of A. nodosum is not a suitable feed supplement in a farmed cod diet.
水产养殖成功满足了全球对许多鱼类的食物需求。然而,大西洋鳕鱼(Gadus morhua)的水产养殖产量仅占市场总产量的2.5%。要使鳕鱼养殖成为一项可行的经济活动,需要解决如何提高生长速度、健康水平和养殖生产率等特定挑战。饲料成分在此起着关键作用。大型藻类(海藻)已被提议作为一种功能性饲料补充剂,对陆生养殖动物和鱼类具有健康和经济效益。此类膳食补充剂对鳕鱼肠道完整性和微生物群的影响尚不清楚,而肠道完整性和微生物群有助于鱼类的整体健壮性。本研究的目的是用大型藻类补充幼年大西洋鳕鱼的饲料,并确定其对鱼的状况和生长、肠道形态以及后肠微生物群组成(16S rRNA扩增子测序)的影响。在一项为期12周的试验中,给鱼投喂三种饲料中的一种:对照饲料(不包含大型藻类)、包含10%的墨角藻(Ascophyllum nodosum)或石莼(Ulva rigida)大型藻类的饲料。
结果表明,在任何时间点,石莼补充饲料组的鱼与对照组在鱼的状况、肠道形态或后肠微生物群方面均无显著差异。墨角藻处理组未观察到这种趋势。该组内的鱼进一步分为“正常”或“生长较慢”两类。“生长较慢”的个体觉得饲料不可口,导致体重和状况因子下降,同时肠道形态和微生物群相对于其他处理发生了改变。排除该组后,我们的结果表明,后肠微生物群在很大程度上受时间压力驱动,无论饮食处理如何,微生物群落随时间推移变得更加相似。最终时间点的核心微生物群由弧菌目(弧菌属和发光杆菌属)、拟杆菌目(拟杆菌属和巨球杆菌属)和梭菌目(毛螺菌属)组成。
我们的研究表明,在幼年养殖大西洋鳕鱼的饲料中可添加10%的石莼大型藻类,而不会对鱼的状况或后肠微生物群落结构产生任何影响。我们还得出结论,在养殖鳕鱼饲料中添加10%的墨角藻不是一种合适的饲料补充剂。