Suppr超能文献

人工晶体计算公式常数:优化策略和数据呈现标准定义。

IOL Formula Constants: Strategies for Optimization and Defining Standards for Presenting Data.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Center for Limbal Stem Cell and Aniridia Research, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(6):1055-1067. doi: 10.1159/000514916. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to present strategies for optimization of lens power (IOLP) formula constants and to show options how to present the results adequately.

METHODS

A dataset of N = 1,601 preoperative biometric values, IOLP data and postoperative refraction data was split into a training set and a test set using a random sequence. Based on the training set, we calculated the formula constants for established lens calculation formulae with different methods. Based on the test set, we derived the formula prediction error (PE) as difference of the achieved refraction from the formula predicted refraction.

RESULTS

For formulae with 1 constant, it is possible to back-calculate the individual constant for each case using formula inversion. However, this is not possible for formulae with >1 constant. In these cases, more advanced concepts such as non-linear optimization strategies are necessary to derive the formula constants. During cross-validation, measures such as the mean absolute or the root mean squared PE or the ratio of cases within mean absolute PE (MAE) limits could be used as quality measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Different constant optimization concepts yield different results. To test the performance of optimized formula constants, a cross-validation strategy is mandatory. We recommend performance curves, where the ratio of cases within absolute PE limits is plotted against the MAE.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在提出优化晶状体屈光力(IOLP)公式常数的策略,并展示如何充分展示结果的选择。

方法

使用随机序列将 N = 1,601 个术前生物测量值、IOLP 数据和术后屈光数据的数据集分为训练集和测试集。基于训练集,我们使用不同的方法计算了不同晶状体计算公式的公式常数。基于测试集,我们得出了公式预测误差(PE),即公式预测的折射与实际折射的差异。

结果

对于具有 1 个常数的公式,可以使用公式反转为每个病例回溯计算单个常数。但是,对于具有>1 个常数的公式则不行。在这些情况下,需要使用非线性优化策略等更先进的概念来推导公式常数。在交叉验证期间,可以使用平均绝对或均方根 PE 或在平均绝对 PE(MAE)范围内的病例比例等措施作为质量度量。

结论

不同的常数优化概念会产生不同的结果。要测试优化公式常数的性能,必须采用交叉验证策略。我们建议绘制性能曲线,其中在绝对 PE 范围内的病例比例与 MAE 相对应。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
3
Update on Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas.人工晶状体计算公式的最新进展。
Ophthalmology. 2019 Sep;126(9):1334-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
5
A comparison of two methods to calculate axial length.两种眼轴长度计算方法的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Mar;45(3):284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.10.039.
6
[Interpretation of the Intraocular Lens Constants for the Haigis Formula].[海吉斯公式人工晶状体常数的解读]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2017 Aug;234(8):975-978. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-110569. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
7
Effect of altering lens constants.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jun;43(6):853. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.05.001.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验