• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
IOL Formula Constants: Strategies for Optimization and Defining Standards for Presenting Data.人工晶体计算公式常数:优化策略和数据呈现标准定义。
Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(6):1055-1067. doi: 10.1159/000514916. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
2
Limitations of constant optimization with disclosed intraocular lens power formulae.披露了眼内晶状体功率公式的恒定优化的局限性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Mar 1;50(3):201-208. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001337.
3
Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power.关于计算人工晶状体屈光力的卡斯托普公式的思考。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 2;16(6):e0252102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252102. eCollection 2021.
4
Optimal Dataset Sizes for Constant Optimization in Published Theoretical Optical Formulae.发表的理论光学公式中常数优化的最佳数据集大小。
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Oct;46(10):1589-1596. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1900272. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
5
Bootstrap Outlier Identification in Clinical Datasets for Lens Power Formula Constant Optimization.临床数据集的引导离群点识别,用于优化镜片屈光力公式常数。
Curr Eye Res. 2023 Mar;48(3):263-269. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2022.2108457. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
6
Comparison of IOL power calculation formulae for pediatric eyes.儿童眼睛人工晶状体屈光度计算公式的比较。
Eye (Lond). 2016 Sep;30(9):1242-50. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.171. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
7
Strategies for formula constant optimisation for intraocular lens power calculation.公式常数优化策略在眼内人工晶状体屈光力计算中的应用。
PLoS One. 2022 May 5;17(5):e0267352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267352. eCollection 2022.
8
Formula constant optimisation techniques including variation of keratometer or corneal refractive index and consideration for classical and modern IOL formulae.公式常数优化技术,包括角膜曲率计或角膜折射率的变化,以及对经典和现代人工晶状体公式的考虑。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282213. eCollection 2023.
9
Comparison of Intraoperative Aberrometry, OCT-Based IOL Formula, Haigis-L, and Masket Formulae for IOL Power Calculation after Laser Vision Correction.激光矫正视力后,比较术中像差、OCT 公式、Haigis-L 公式和 Masket 公式在人工晶状体屈光力计算中的应用。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1096-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.01.027. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
10
Comparison of three newer generation freely available intraocular lens power calculation formulae across all axial lengths.比较三种新一代免费的眼内人工晶状体计算公式在所有眼轴长度上的表现。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;69(3):580-584. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_943_20.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence Based Analysis Enhances Surgical Outcomes of Novice Resident Surgeons.循证分析可提高新手住院医师的手术效果。
Vision (Basel). 2025 Jul 3;9(3):52. doi: 10.3390/vision9030052.
2
Jackknife and bootstrapping resampling techniques to evaluate the precision of lens formula constants.用于评估透镜公式常数精度的刀切法和自助重抽样技术。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Sep;103(6):e422-e433. doi: 10.1111/aos.17522. Epub 2025 May 15.
3
Considerations on the Haigis formula: Are better outcomes possible with tuning?关于海吉斯公式的思考:调整参数能否带来更好的结果?
Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug;103(5):e298-e309. doi: 10.1111/aos.17491. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
4
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based intraocular lens calculator: AI-based IOL-optimized formula.基于人工智能的人工晶状体计算器评估:基于人工智能的人工晶状体优化公式。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Dec 17;51(4):332-6. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001603.
5
Impact of the Minimization of Standard Deviation Before Zeroization of the Mean Bias on the Performance of IOL Power Formulas.平均偏差零化前标准差最小化对 IOL 屈光力公式性能的影响。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 1;13(10):22. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.10.22.
6
A New Method to Minimize the Standard Deviation and Root Mean Square of the Prediction Error of Single-Optimized IOL Power Formulas.一种最小化单优化人工晶状体屈光力公式预测误差标准差和均方根的新方法。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Jun 3;13(6):2. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.6.2.
7
Performance of a simplified strategy for formula constant optimisation in intraocular lens power calculation.简化策略在人工晶状体屈光力计算中优化公式常数的性能。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb;103(1):e10-e18. doi: 10.1111/aos.16692. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
8
Theoretical Impact of Intraocular Lens Design Variations on the Accuracy of IOL Power Calculations.人工晶状体设计变化对人工晶状体屈光度计算准确性的理论影响。
J Clin Med. 2023 May 11;12(10):3404. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103404.
9
Formula constant optimisation techniques including variation of keratometer or corneal refractive index and consideration for classical and modern IOL formulae.公式常数优化技术,包括角膜曲率计或角膜折射率的变化,以及对经典和现代人工晶状体公式的考虑。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282213. eCollection 2023.
10
A systemic review and network meta-analysis of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in primary angle-closure conditions.在原发性闭角型青光眼条件下,眼内人工晶状体屈光力计算公式准确性的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 14;17(10):e0276286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276286. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Calculation of Intraocular Lens Power.人工智能、机器学习与人工晶状体屈光度计算
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2020 Dec;237(12):1430-1437. doi: 10.1055/a-1298-8121. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
2
Effect of lens constants optimization on the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for highly myopic eyes.晶状体常数优化对高度近视眼人工晶状体屈光度计算公式准确性的影响。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 18;12(6):943-948. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.06.10. eCollection 2019.
3
Update on Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas.人工晶状体计算公式的最新进展。
Ophthalmology. 2019 Sep;126(9):1334-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
4
Approximating sum-of-segments axial length from a traditional optical low-coherence reflectometry measurement.从传统光学低相干反射测量中估算线段和的轴向长度。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Mar;45(3):351-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.026.
5
A comparison of two methods to calculate axial length.两种眼轴长度计算方法的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Mar;45(3):284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.10.039.
6
[Interpretation of the Intraocular Lens Constants for the Haigis Formula].[海吉斯公式人工晶状体常数的解读]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2017 Aug;234(8):975-978. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-110569. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
7
Effect of altering lens constants.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jun;43(6):853. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.05.001.
8
Determination of Personalized IOL-Constants for the Haigis Formula under Consideration of Measurement Precision.考虑测量精度时为Haigis公式确定个性化人工晶状体常数
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158988. eCollection 2016.
9
Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods.眼轴长度大于26.0毫米的眼睛的人工晶状体屈光力计算:公式与方法的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;41(3):548-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.033. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
10
C constant: new concept for ray tracing-assisted intraocular lens power calculation.C常数:光线追踪辅助人工晶状体屈光力计算的新概念。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 May;40(5):764-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.037.

人工晶体计算公式常数:优化策略和数据呈现标准定义。

IOL Formula Constants: Strategies for Optimization and Defining Standards for Presenting Data.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Center for Limbal Stem Cell and Aniridia Research, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(6):1055-1067. doi: 10.1159/000514916. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1159/000514916
PMID:33530082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8743903/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to present strategies for optimization of lens power (IOLP) formula constants and to show options how to present the results adequately.

METHODS

A dataset of N = 1,601 preoperative biometric values, IOLP data and postoperative refraction data was split into a training set and a test set using a random sequence. Based on the training set, we calculated the formula constants for established lens calculation formulae with different methods. Based on the test set, we derived the formula prediction error (PE) as difference of the achieved refraction from the formula predicted refraction.

RESULTS

For formulae with 1 constant, it is possible to back-calculate the individual constant for each case using formula inversion. However, this is not possible for formulae with >1 constant. In these cases, more advanced concepts such as non-linear optimization strategies are necessary to derive the formula constants. During cross-validation, measures such as the mean absolute or the root mean squared PE or the ratio of cases within mean absolute PE (MAE) limits could be used as quality measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Different constant optimization concepts yield different results. To test the performance of optimized formula constants, a cross-validation strategy is mandatory. We recommend performance curves, where the ratio of cases within absolute PE limits is plotted against the MAE.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在提出优化晶状体屈光力(IOLP)公式常数的策略,并展示如何充分展示结果的选择。

方法

使用随机序列将 N = 1,601 个术前生物测量值、IOLP 数据和术后屈光数据的数据集分为训练集和测试集。基于训练集,我们使用不同的方法计算了不同晶状体计算公式的公式常数。基于测试集,我们得出了公式预测误差(PE),即公式预测的折射与实际折射的差异。

结果

对于具有 1 个常数的公式,可以使用公式反转为每个病例回溯计算单个常数。但是,对于具有>1 个常数的公式则不行。在这些情况下,需要使用非线性优化策略等更先进的概念来推导公式常数。在交叉验证期间,可以使用平均绝对或均方根 PE 或在平均绝对 PE(MAE)范围内的病例比例等措施作为质量度量。

结论

不同的常数优化概念会产生不同的结果。要测试优化公式常数的性能,必须采用交叉验证策略。我们建议绘制性能曲线,其中在绝对 PE 范围内的病例比例与 MAE 相对应。