• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 XGBoost 模型预测 ICU 中急性肾损伤患者的死亡率。

Predicting mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU using XGBoost model.

机构信息

Information Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

Department of Medical Informatics, West China Medical School, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0246306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246306. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0246306
PMID:33539390
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7861386/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to construct a mortality prediction model using the XGBoot (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) decision tree model for AKI (acute kidney injury) patients in the ICU (intensive care unit), and to compare its performance with that of three other machine learning models.

METHODS

We used the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) for model development and performance comparison. The prediction performance of the XGBoot model was compared with the other three machine learning models. These models included LR (logistic regression), SVM (support vector machines), and RF (random forest). In the model comparison, the AUROC (area under receiver operating curve), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were used to evaluate the predictive performance of each model.

RESULTS

A total of 7548 AKI patients were analyzed in this study. The overall in-hospital mortality of AKI patients was 16.35%. The best performing algorithm in this study was XGBoost with the highest AUROC (0.796, p < 0.01), F1(0.922, p < 0.01) and accuracy (0.860). The precision (0.860) and recall (0.994) of the XGBoost model rank second among the four models.

CONCLUSION

XGBoot model had obvious advantages of performance compared to the other machine learning models. This will be helpful for risk identification and early intervention for AKI patients at risk of death.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在构建一个使用 XGBoot(极端梯度提升)决策树模型对 ICU(重症监护病房)中 AKI(急性肾损伤)患者进行死亡率预测的模型,并与其他三种机器学习模型进行性能比较。

方法

我们使用 eICU 协作研究数据库(eICU-CRD)进行模型开发和性能比较。比较了 XGBoot 模型与其他三种机器学习模型的预测性能。这些模型包括 LR(逻辑回归)、SVM(支持向量机)和 RF(随机森林)。在模型比较中,使用 AUROC(接收者操作特征曲线下面积)、准确性、精度、召回率和 F1 分数来评估每个模型的预测性能。

结果

本研究共分析了 7548 例 AKI 患者。AKI 患者的院内总体死亡率为 16.35%。在这项研究中表现最好的算法是 XGBoost,其 AUROC(0.796,p < 0.01)、F1(0.922,p < 0.01)和准确性(0.860)最高。XGBoost 模型的精度(0.860)和召回率(0.994)在四个模型中排名第二。

结论

与其他机器学习模型相比,XGBoot 模型在性能方面具有明显优势。这将有助于识别 AKI 患者死亡风险,并进行早期干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d580/7861386/40c10edaf69d/pone.0246306.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d580/7861386/8db9d9166fea/pone.0246306.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d580/7861386/75eae50dd3da/pone.0246306.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d580/7861386/40c10edaf69d/pone.0246306.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d580/7861386/8db9d9166fea/pone.0246306.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d580/7861386/75eae50dd3da/pone.0246306.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d580/7861386/40c10edaf69d/pone.0246306.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU using XGBoost model.使用 XGBoost 模型预测 ICU 中急性肾损伤患者的死亡率。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0246306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246306. eCollection 2021.
2
Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU using random forest model.应用随机森林模型预测 ICU 中急性肾损伤患者的院内死亡率。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 May;125:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
3
[Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in intensive care unit based on machine learning].基于机器学习构建重症监护病房脓毒症患者院内死亡率预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):696-701. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221219-01104.
4
Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree.使用梯度提升决策树预测重症监护病房脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 14;100(19):e25813. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025813.
5
The prediction of in-hospital mortality in chronic kidney disease patients with coronary artery disease using machine learning models.应用机器学习模型预测伴有冠状动脉疾病的慢性肾脏病患者的院内死亡率。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jan 18;28(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-00995-x.
6
[Application of support vector machine in predicting in-hospital mortality risk of patients with acute kidney injury in ICU].支持向量机在预测ICU中急性肾损伤患者院内死亡风险中的应用
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Apr 18;50(2):239-244.
7
Prediction Models for AKI in ICU: A Comparative Study.重症监护病房中急性肾损伤的预测模型:一项比较研究。
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Feb 25;14:623-632. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S289671. eCollection 2021.
8
Significance of platelets in the early warning of new-onset AKI in the ICU by using supervise learning: a retrospective analysis.应用监督学习的血小板在 ICU 新发 AKI 早期预警中的意义:一项回顾性分析。
Ren Fail. 2023 Dec;45(1):2194433. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2194433.
9
Machine learning for the prediction of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis.机器学习在脓毒症患者急性肾损伤预测中的应用。
J Transl Med. 2022 May 13;20(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03364-0.
10
Predicting renal function recovery and short-term reversibility among acute kidney injury patients in the ICU: comparison of machine learning methods and conventional regression.预测 ICU 急性肾损伤患者的肾功能恢复和短期可逆性:机器学习方法与传统回归的比较。
Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):1326-1337. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2107542.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning based CAGIB score predicts in-hospital mortality of cirrhotic patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.基于机器学习的CAGIB评分可预测肝硬化急性胃肠道出血患者的院内死亡率。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 31;8(1):489. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01883-w.
2
Predictive model and risk analysis for outcomes in diabetic foot ulcer using eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm and SHapley Additive exPlanation.使用极端梯度提升算法和夏普利值加法解释法对糖尿病足溃疡结局的预测模型及风险分析
World J Diabetes. 2025 Jul 15;16(7):104789. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.104789.
3
Analysis of the most influential factors affecting outcomes of lung transplant recipients: a multivariate prediction model based on UNOS Data.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine Learning Model for Risk Prediction of Community-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury Hospitalization From Electronic Health Records: Development and Validation Study.基于电子健康记录的社区获得性急性肾损伤住院风险预测的机器学习模型:开发和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 4;22(8):e16903. doi: 10.2196/16903.
2
Deep-learning-based risk stratification for mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction.基于深度学习的急性心肌梗死患者死亡率风险分层。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 31;14(10):e0224502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224502. eCollection 2019.
3
ISeeU: Visually interpretable deep learning for mortality prediction inside the ICU.
影响肺移植受者结局的最具影响力因素分析:基于器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据的多变量预测模型
BMJ Open. 2025 May 16;15(5):e089796. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089796.
4
Predicting the risk of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction using an interpretable machine learning model.使用可解释的机器学习模型预测急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭的风险。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 24;12:1444323. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1444323. eCollection 2025.
5
A machine learning model to predict neurological deterioration after mild traumatic brain injury in older adults.一种用于预测老年人轻度创伤性脑损伤后神经功能恶化的机器学习模型。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 3;15:1502153. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1502153. eCollection 2024.
6
Acute Kidney Injury Prognosis Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods: A Systematic Review.使用机器学习方法预测急性肾损伤的预后:一项系统评价。
Kidney Med. 2024 Nov 15;7(1):100936. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100936. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Predicting student self-efficacy in Muslim societies using machine learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法预测穆斯林社会中的学生自我效能感。
Front Big Data. 2024 Dec 13;7:1449572. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2024.1449572. eCollection 2024.
8
Exploring the role of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Kidney Injury management: a comprehensive review and future research agenda.探索人工智能在急性肾损伤管理中的作用:全面综述和未来研究议程。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02758-y.
9
Leveraging machine learning to enhance appointment adherence at a novel post-discharge care transition clinic.利用机器学习提高一家新型出院后护理过渡诊所的预约依从性。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Nov 9;7(4):ooae086. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae086. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
The lasting effects of childhood trauma on developing psychiatric symptoms: A population-based, large-scale comparison study.童年创伤对精神症状发展的长期影响:一项基于人群的大规模比较研究。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Oct 24;11:e98. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.100. eCollection 2024.
ISeeU:重症监护室内用于死亡率预测的可视觉解释深度学习。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Oct;98:103269. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103269. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
4
Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury.比较用于预测急性肾损伤的机器学习算法
Am Surg. 2019 Jul 1;85(7):725-729.
5
Combining patient visual timelines with deep learning to predict mortality.将患者视觉时间线与深度学习相结合来预测死亡率。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0220640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220640. eCollection 2019.
6
Correlation of Thyroid Hormone Profile with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房脓毒症患者甲状腺激素水平与急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II评分的相关性作为预后指标
J Assoc Physicians India. 2018 Jul;66(7):59-62.
7
HIV-1 tropism prediction by the XGboost and HMM methods.使用 XGBoost 和 HMM 方法预测 HIV-1 嗜性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 10;9(1):9997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46420-4.
8
Developing prediction models for clinical use using logistic regression: an overview.使用逻辑回归开发临床应用的预测模型:综述
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Mar;11(Suppl 4):S574-S584. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.01.25.
9
XGBoost Model for Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis.XGBoost 模型用于慢性肾脏病诊断。
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2020 Nov-Dec;17(6):2131-2140. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2019.2911071. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
10
Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU using random forest model.应用随机森林模型预测 ICU 中急性肾损伤患者的院内死亡率。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 May;125:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 12.