• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偏头痛致残评估量表(修订版)葡萄牙语版的信度和效度。

Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment.

机构信息

Centre for Health Studies and Research of University of Coimbra/Centre for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology, Faculty of Economics of University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Neurology Department of Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Faculty of Medicine of University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2021 Feb 6;21(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02085-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12883-021-02085-z
PMID:33549045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7866748/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) is a useful tool to measure headache-related disability. Modified MIDAS with 4-week recall period reduces recall bias and improves accuracy of the results. This study aimed at validating mMIDAS in Portuguese.

METHODS

Studied population consisted of adult migraine patients attending a headache outpatient clinic. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility in a 3-week test-retest. Content validity was evaluated by two expert panels. Construct validity was tested by comparing mMIDAS-P index in socioeconomic and clinical patient groups and scale unidimensionality was evidenced by factor analysis. Criterion validity was tested using EQ-5D-5L and HADS.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients, 88% female, mean age of 44 years, participated. They had, in average, 9.7 headache days in previous month, pain averaging 7.5/10. About 69.9% were on a migraine prophylactic treatment, and 42.4% had severe disability; 29.4 and 13.0% showed, respectively, moderate/severe anxiety and depression. Content validity showed that mMIDAS-P is simple and clinically useful. It did not show to be determined by patient's sociodemographic characteristics and it was correlated with depression scale and EQ-5D-5L. Test-retest demonstrated high reproductive reliability and good internal consistency.

CONCLUSION

mMIDAS-P is valid and reliable. We strongly recommend it for clinical and research use.

摘要

背景

偏头痛残疾评估量表(MIDAS)是一种用于测量头痛相关残疾的有用工具。采用 4 周回顾期的改良 MIDAS 可减少回忆偏倚并提高结果的准确性。本研究旨在验证葡萄牙语版 mMIDAS 的有效性。

方法

研究人群由头痛门诊就诊的成年偏头痛患者组成。在 3 周的测试-重测中评估了可靠性,包括内部一致性和可重复性。通过两个专家小组评估内容效度。通过比较社会经济和临床患者组的 mMIDAS-P 指数来检验构念效度,并通过因子分析证明量表的单一维度。采用 EQ-5D-5L 和 HADS 来检验效标效度。

结果

92 名患者,88%为女性,平均年龄为 44 岁,平均每月头痛 9.7 天,疼痛平均评分为 7.5/10。约 69.9%的患者正在接受偏头痛预防性治疗,42.4%的患者存在严重残疾;分别有 29.4%和 13.0%的患者表现出中度/重度焦虑和抑郁。内容效度表明,mMIDAS-P 简单且具有临床实用性。它不受患者社会人口统计学特征的影响,与抑郁量表和 EQ-5D-5L 相关。测试-重测显示出较高的可重复性和良好的内部一致性。

结论

mMIDAS-P 具有有效性和可靠性。我们强烈推荐它用于临床和研究用途。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment.偏头痛致残评估量表(修订版)葡萄牙语版的信度和效度。
BMC Neurol. 2021 Feb 6;21(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02085-z.
2
Reliability and validity of the Japanese Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire.日本偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)问卷的信度与效度
Headache. 2003 Apr;43(4):343-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03069.x.
3
Validity and reliability of the Turkish Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire.土耳其偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)问卷的效度和信度。
Headache. 2004 Sep;44(8):786-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04146.x.
4
Validation of the Spanish version of the migraine disability assessment questionnaire (MIDAS) in university students with migraine.偏头痛残疾评估问卷(MIDAS)西班牙语版在偏头痛大学生中的验证。
BMC Neurol. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01646-y.
5
Validity and reliability of the Greek Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ Version 2.1-GR).希腊偏头痛特异性生活质量问卷(MSQ 版本 2.1-GR)的有效性和可靠性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jul 15;8(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00762-4.
6
Validity, reliability and application of the taiwan version of the migraine disability assessment questionnaire.台湾版偏头痛残疾评估问卷的效度、信度及应用
J Formos Med Assoc. 2006 Jul;105(7):563-8. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60151-0.
7
Development and initial validation of the Kiswahili version of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS-K) questionnaire.开发并初步验证斯瓦希里语版偏头痛残疾评估量表(MIDAS-K)问卷。
Headache. 2023 Jul-Aug;63(7):880-888. doi: 10.1111/head.14592. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
8
An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score.一项评估偏头痛残疾评定量表(MIDAS)评分可靠性的国际研究。
Neurology. 1999 Sep 22;53(5):988-94. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.5.988.
9
Thai-version Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire: concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and factors predictive for migraine-related disability.泰语版偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)问卷:同时效度、重测信度、内部一致性以及偏头痛相关残疾的预测因素。
Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2020 Sep 20;14(4):139-150. doi: 10.1515/abm-2020-0021. eCollection 2020 Aug.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale to European Portuguese language.魁北克腰痛残疾量表的跨文化调适与验证:欧洲葡萄牙语版。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 1;38(23):E1491-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a439cc.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the efficacy and safety of Erenumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor, in patients with chronic and episodic migraine: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with subgroup analysis.揭示靶向降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)受体的单克隆抗体erenumab在慢性和发作性偏头痛患者中的疗效和安全性:一项GRADE评估的随机临床试验系统评价和荟萃分析及亚组分析
Head Face Med. 2025 Mar 26;21(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00494-w.
2
Health-Related Quality of Life in Migraine: EQ-5D-5L-Based Study in Routine Clinical Practice.偏头痛患者的健康相关生活质量:基于EQ-5D-5L的常规临床实践研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 24;11(23):6925. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236925.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Spanish version of the migraine disability assessment questionnaire (MIDAS) in university students with migraine.偏头痛残疾评估问卷(MIDAS)西班牙语版在偏头痛大学生中的验证。
BMC Neurol. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01646-y.
2
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家偏头痛和紧张型头痛负担,1990-2016 年:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Nov;17(11):954-976. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30322-3.
4
Validation of the Arabic Version of the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale Among Lebanese Patients with Migraine.偏头痛残疾评估量表阿拉伯文版在黎巴嫩偏头痛患者中的验证。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2019 Winter;33(1):47–53. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2102. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
5
Migraine-related disability, impact, and health-related quality of life among patients with episodic migraine receiving preventive treatment with erenumab.接受依瑞奈umab 预防性治疗的发作性偏头痛患者的偏头痛相关残疾、影响和健康相关生活质量。
Cephalalgia. 2018 Sep;38(10):1622-1631. doi: 10.1177/0333102418789072. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
6
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the German version of the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire.偏头痛致残评估量表(MIDAS)德语版的翻译、跨文化调适和信度评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Mar 9;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0871-5.
7
Reliability and Validity of the Greek Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire.希腊偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)问卷的信度和效度
Pharmacoecon Open. 2018 Mar;2(1):77-85. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0034-3.
8
Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England.重视与健康相关的生活质量:英国的EQ-5D-5L价值集。
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):7-22. doi: 10.1002/hec.3564. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
9
Psychological Factors Associated With Chronic Migraine and Severe Migraine-Related Disability: An Observational Study in a Tertiary Headache Center.与慢性偏头痛及严重偏头痛相关残疾相关的心理因素:在三级头痛中心的一项观察性研究
Headache. 2017 Apr;57(4):593-604. doi: 10.1111/head.13021. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
Migraine affects 1 in 10 people worldwide featuring recent rise: A systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based studies involving 6 million participants.偏头痛影响着全球十分之一的人口,且发病率呈上升趋势:一项对涉及600万参与者的社区研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol Sci. 2017 Jan 15;372:307-315. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.11.071. Epub 2016 Dec 3.