• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字健康干预在心脏康复中的应用:系统文献回顾。

Digital Health Interventions for Cardiac Rehabilitation: Systematic Literature Review.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

University of Patras School of Medicine, Patras, Greece.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e18773. doi: 10.2196/18773.

DOI:10.2196/18773
PMID:33555259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7899799/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Despite strong evidence supporting the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), over 80% of eligible patients do not participate in CR. Digital health technologies (ie, the delivery of care using the internet, wearable devices, and mobile apps) have the potential to address the challenges associated with traditional facility-based CR programs, but little is known about the comprehensiveness of these interventions to serve as digital approaches to CR. Overall, there is a lack of a systematic evaluation of the current literature on digital interventions for CR.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic literature review is to provide an in-depth analysis of the potential of digital health technologies to address the challenges associated with traditional CR. Through this review, we aim to summarize the current literature on digital interventions for CR, identify the key components of CR that have been successfully addressed through digital interventions, and describe the gaps in research that need to be addressed for sustainable and scalable digital CR interventions.

METHODS

Our strategy for identifying the primary literature pertaining to CR with digital solutions (defined as technology employed to deliver remote care beyond the use of the telephone) included a consultation with an expert in the field of digital CR and searches of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases for original studies published from January 1990 to October 2018.

RESULTS

Our search returned 31 eligible studies, of which 22 were randomized controlled trials. The reviewed CR interventions primarily targeted physical activity counseling (31/31, 100%), baseline assessment (30/31, 97%), and exercise training (27/31, 87%). The most commonly used modalities were smartphones or mobile devices (20/31, 65%), web-based portals (18/31, 58%), and email-SMS (11/31, 35%). Approximately one-third of the studies addressed the CR core components of nutrition counseling, psychological management, and weight management. In contrast, less than a third of the studies addressed other CR core components, including the management of lipids, diabetes, smoking cessation, and blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital technologies have the potential to increase access and participation in CR by mitigating the challenges associated with traditional, facility-based CR. However, previously evaluated interventions primarily focused on physical activity counseling and exercise training. Thus, further research is required with more comprehensive CR interventions and long-term follow-up to understand the clinical impact of digital interventions.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病(CVD)是全球范围内的主要死因。尽管有强有力的证据支持心脏康复(CR)的益处,但超过 80%的合格患者未参加 CR。数字健康技术(即通过互联网、可穿戴设备和移动应用程序提供的护理)有可能解决传统基于设施的 CR 计划所面临的挑战,但对于这些干预措施作为 CR 的数字方法的全面性知之甚少。总体而言,目前关于 CR 的数字干预措施的文献缺乏系统评价。

目的

本系统文献综述的目的是深入分析数字健康技术解决与传统 CR 相关挑战的潜力。通过本次综述,我们旨在总结有关 CR 的数字干预措施的现有文献,确定通过数字干预措施成功解决的 CR 的关键组成部分,并描述需要解决的研究空白,以实现可持续和可扩展的数字 CR 干预措施。

方法

我们确定与数字解决方案相关的 CR 主要文献(定义为除使用电话外还用于远程护理的技术)的策略包括与数字 CR 领域的专家进行磋商,并在 PubMed(MEDLINE)、Embase、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 数据库中搜索 1990 年 1 月至 2018 年 10 月期间发表的原始研究。

结果

我们的搜索返回了 31 项符合条件的研究,其中 22 项为随机对照试验。所审查的 CR 干预措施主要针对体力活动咨询(31/31,100%)、基线评估(30/31,97%)和运动训练(27/31,87%)。最常用的模式是智能手机或移动设备(20/31,65%)、基于网络的门户(18/31,58%)和电子邮件-SMS(11/31,35%)。大约三分之一的研究涉及营养咨询、心理管理和体重管理等 CR 的核心组成部分。相比之下,不到三分之一的研究涉及其他 CR 的核心组成部分,包括血脂、糖尿病、戒烟和血压管理。

结论

数字技术有可能通过减轻传统基于设施的 CR 所面临的挑战,增加 CR 的可及性和参与度。然而,以前评估的干预措施主要侧重于体力活动咨询和运动训练。因此,需要进行更多涉及全面 CR 干预措施和长期随访的研究,以了解数字干预措施的临床影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/314c/7899799/7358652ba3f7/jmir_v23i2e18773_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/314c/7899799/a499bd86a82e/jmir_v23i2e18773_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/314c/7899799/7358652ba3f7/jmir_v23i2e18773_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/314c/7899799/a499bd86a82e/jmir_v23i2e18773_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/314c/7899799/7358652ba3f7/jmir_v23i2e18773_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital Health Interventions for Cardiac Rehabilitation: Systematic Literature Review.数字健康干预在心脏康复中的应用:系统文献回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e18773. doi: 10.2196/18773.
2
Barriers to and Facilitators of Technology in Cardiac Rehabilitation and Self-Management: Systematic Qualitative Grounded Theory Review.心脏康复和自我管理中技术应用的障碍和促进因素:系统定性扎根理论综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 11;22(11):e18025. doi: 10.2196/18025.
3
Smartphones in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.智能手机在心血管疾病二级预防中的应用:一项系统综述。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0764-x.
4
Digital Health Apps in the Clinical Care of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Scoping Review.数字健康应用在炎症性肠病临床护理中的应用:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 19;21(8):e14630. doi: 10.2196/14630.
5
The Effectiveness of Self-Management Mobile Phone and Tablet Apps in Long-term Condition Management: A Systematic Review.自我管理手机和平板应用程序在长期疾病管理中的有效性:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 16;18(5):e97. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4883.
6
The Use of Mobile Apps and SMS Messaging as Physical and Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review.使用移动应用程序和短信作为身心健康干预措施:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 24;19(8):e295. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7740.
7
Intervention and Evaluation of Mobile Health Technologies in Management of Patients Undergoing Chronic Dialysis: Scoping Review.移动医疗技术在慢性透析患者管理中的干预和评估:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 3;8(4):e15549. doi: 10.2196/15549.
8
9
Adherence to Established Treatment Guidelines Among Unguided Digital Interventions for Depression: Quality Evaluation of 28 Web-Based Programs and Mobile Apps.针对抑郁症的非引导性数字干预措施中对既定治疗指南的依从性:28 个基于网络的程序和移动应用程序的质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 13;22(7):e16136. doi: 10.2196/16136.
10
Methods and Evaluation Criteria for Apps and Digital Interventions for Diabetes Self-Management: Systematic Review.糖尿病自我管理应用程序和数字干预措施的方法及评估标准:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 6;22(7):e18480. doi: 10.2196/18480.

引用本文的文献

1
Task effectiveness, usability, and acceptability of mHealth technologies among older adults at risk for cardiovascular disease: a feasibility study.移动健康技术在有心血管疾病风险的老年人中的任务有效性、可用性和可接受性:一项可行性研究。
Health Technol (Berl). 2025 May;15(3):531-538. doi: 10.1007/s12553-025-00969-5. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
Mobile Health Applications for Secondary Prevention After Myocardial Infarction or PCI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.心肌梗死或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后二级预防的移动健康应用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 1;13(15):1881. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151881.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of eHealth cardiac rehabilitation on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.电子健康心脏康复对冠心病患者健康结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Mar;76(3):754-772. doi: 10.1111/jan.14272. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
2
Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scientific Statement From the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology.基于家庭的心脏康复:美国心血管和肺脏康复协会、美国心脏协会以及美国心脏病学会的科学声明。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 9;74(1):133-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 May 13.
3
Effects of a digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation intervention on risk factors, recurrent hospitalization and mortality.
数字化心脏康复干预对危险因素、再住院率和死亡率的影响。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 Apr 29;6(4):688-703. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf043. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
"If you ask me … ": experienced cardiac rehabilitation patients' perspectives on maintaining regular heart-healthy physical activity.“如果你问我……”:有经验的心脏康复患者对保持规律的心脏健康体育活动的看法。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2516616. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2025.2516616. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
5
Impact of digital health management on clinical outcomes during post-PCI outpatient care in patients with acute coronary syndrome: study protocol for a multicentre, randomized controlled trial.数字健康管理对急性冠脉综合征患者PCI术后门诊护理临床结局的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 20;12:1555544. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1555544. eCollection 2025.
6
Effectiveness of a WeChat Mini Program-Based Intervention on Promoting Multiple Health Behavior Changes Among Chinese Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases in Home-Based Rehabilitation: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于微信小程序的干预措施对促进中国心血管疾病患者居家康复中多种健康行为改变的效果:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 3;27:e66249. doi: 10.2196/66249.
7
Data source and utilization of artificial intelligence technologies in vascular surgery-a scoping review.血管外科中人工智能技术的数据来源与应用——一项范围综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 7;12:1497822. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1497822. eCollection 2025.
8
Cardiac Self-Efficacy Improvement in a Digital Heart Health Program: Secondary Analysis From a Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study.数字心脏健康计划中心脏自我效能的改善:一项可行性和可接受性试点研究的二次分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 24;9:e60676. doi: 10.2196/60676.
9
Digital Health Solutions for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Systematic Review.心血管疾病预防的数字健康解决方案:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 23;27:e64981. doi: 10.2196/64981.
10
Effectiveness of 'Internet Plus' remote management in improving cardiac rehabilitation outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients.“互联网 +”远程管理对改善急性心肌梗死患者心脏康复结局的有效性
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Dec 15;16(12):7667-7677. doi: 10.62347/FFGR2850. eCollection 2024.
Older Adults' Perspectives on Using Digital Technology to Maintain Good Mental Health: Interactive Group Study.
老年人对使用数字技术维持良好心理健康的看法:互动小组研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 13;21(2):e11694. doi: 10.2196/11694.
4
Feasibility of a Smartphone-enabled Cardiac Rehabilitation Program in Male Veterans With Previous Clinical Evidence of Coronary Heart Disease.智能手机应用于有临床冠心病证据的男性退伍军人心脏康复计划的可行性。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;122(9):1471-1476. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.07.028. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
5
Innovative Application of a Home-Based and Remote Sensing Cardiac Rehabilitation Protocol in Chinese Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.基于家庭和遥感的心脏康复方案在中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的患者中的创新应用。
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Apr;25(4):288-293. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0064. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
6
Home-based telehealth exercise training program in Chinese patients with heart failure: A randomized controlled trial.中国心力衰竭患者的家庭远程健康运动训练项目:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e12069. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012069.
7
Effects and costs of real-time cardiac telerehabilitation: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.实时心脏远程康复的效果和成本:随机对照非劣效性试验。
Heart. 2019 Jan;105(2):122-129. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313189. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
8
End Users Want Alternative Intervention Delivery Models: Usability and Acceptability of the REMOTE-CR Exercise-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation Program.终端用户需要替代干预交付模式:基于远程运动的心脏远程康复计划的可用性和可接受性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Nov;99(11):2373-2377. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.027. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
9
Using Digital Health Technology to Better Generate Evidence and Deliver Evidence-Based Care.利用数字健康技术更好地生成证据并提供基于证据的护理。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jun 12;71(23):2680-2690. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.523.
10
Effects of a 12-week mHealth program on peak VO and physical activity patterns after completing cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial.12 周移动医疗方案对完成心脏康复后峰值 VO₂ 和身体活动模式的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Am Heart J. 2018 May;199:105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 7.