Suppr超能文献

一款移动医疗应用程序和胸部可穿戴远程运动监测干预在 2 型糖尿病患者中的应用效率:一项前瞻性、多中心随机对照试验。

Efficiency of an mHealth App and Chest-Wearable Remote Exercise Monitoring Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Endocrinology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 9;9(2):e23338. doi: 10.2196/23338.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Exercise has been recommended as a cornerstone for diabetes management. Supervised exercise is more efficient than unsupervised exercise but is less convenient and accessible.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the efficiency of exercise using a fitness app and heart rate band to remotely monitor patients with type 2 diabetes in comparison with that of traditional exercise.

METHODS

Patients with type 2 diabetes without severe complications or comorbidities were recruited to participate in this multicenter randomized controlled trial and were allocated to either the intervention or control group (1:1 ratio). Participants in both groups were asked to engage in moderate to vigorous physical activity for at least 150 minutes per week; each participant was prescribed individualized exercises. Participants in the intervention group were asked to follow exercise videos on the app and to wear a chest band; heart rate, exercise duration, and exercise intensity were recorded by the app. Participants in the control group self-reported exercise intensity and duration. Cardiopulmonary endurance, body composition, blood glucose level, and insulin level were assessed before and after a 3-month exercise program.

RESULTS

Of the 101 participants who were enrolled, the majority of them (85/101, 84.2%) completed the study. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, with the exception that participants in the intervention group were slightly younger and less likely to have hypertension. Self-reported exercise duration was longer than app-recorded exercise duration (control: mean 214 minutes/week; intervention: mean 193 minutes/week); in addition, a higher proportion of participants in the control group (29/41, 71%) than in the intervention group (18/44, 41%) met the 150-minute target for moderate to vigorous physical activity. However, compared with the control group, the intervention group had a larger increase in cardiopulmonary endurance (mean difference -2.0 bpm [beats per minute] vs 1.0 bpm; P=.02) and a larger decrease in body fat percentage (mean difference -1.8% vs -0.8%; P=.01). There was no difference in hemoglobin A1c level reduction between the two groups, yet more participants in the intervention group stopped taking their antidiabetic drugs or had their dosages lowered by an endocrinologist, compared with those in the control group. There were no serious adverse events in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first randomized controlled trial in China, to our knowledge, to test the efficiency of exercise using a fitness app and heart rate band to remotely monitor prescribed exercise in patients with type 2 diabetes. The findings of our study suggest that exercise programs may be more efficient if participants are remotely monitored with an app and heart rate band than if participants are not monitored.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR1800015963; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=27080.

摘要

背景

运动已被推荐作为糖尿病管理的基石。有监督的运动比无监督的运动更有效,但便利性和可及性较差。

目的

我们旨在通过使用健身应用程序和心率带远程监测 2 型糖尿病患者的运动,与传统运动相比,确定运动的效率。

方法

招募无严重并发症或合并症的 2 型糖尿病患者参加这项多中心随机对照试验,并将其分配到干预组或对照组(1:1 比例)。两组患者均被要求每周进行至少 150 分钟的中等至剧烈体力活动;为每位参与者制定了个性化的运动方案。干预组的参与者被要求按照应用程序上的运动视频进行运动,并佩戴胸带;应用程序记录心率、运动持续时间和运动强度。对照组的参与者自行报告运动强度和持续时间。在 3 个月的运动计划前后评估心肺耐力、身体成分、血糖水平和胰岛素水平。

结果

在纳入的 101 名参与者中,大多数(85/101,84.2%)完成了研究。两组的基线特征相似,除了干预组的参与者年龄稍小且高血压的可能性较低。自我报告的运动持续时间长于应用程序记录的运动持续时间(对照组:平均 214 分钟/周;干预组:平均 193 分钟/周);此外,对照组(29/41,71%)中比干预组(18/44,41%)有更多的参与者达到中等至剧烈体力活动的 150 分钟目标。然而,与对照组相比,干预组的心肺耐力增加幅度更大(平均差异-2.0 bpm [每分钟跳动次数] vs 1.0 bpm;P=.02),体脂百分比降低幅度更大(平均差异-1.8% vs -0.8%;P=.01)。两组的血红蛋白 A1c 水平降低无差异,但与对照组相比,更多的干预组参与者停止服用降糖药物或其剂量由内分泌医生降低。两组均无严重不良事件。

结论

这是我们所知的在中国进行的首次使用健身应用程序和心率带远程监测 2 型糖尿病患者规定运动的效率的随机对照试验。我们的研究结果表明,如果使用应用程序和心率带远程监测参与者,运动方案可能更有效。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心 ChiCTR1800015963;http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=27080.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eae/7902189/eede8f744637/mhealth_v9i2e23338_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验