• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.猪育种中杂交后代的选择性基因分型和表型数据纳入策略,用于杂交和纯种选择的联合应用。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Mar 1;99(3). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab041.
2
Bias in variance component estimation in swine crossbreeding schemes using selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies.利用选择性基因分型和表型策略的猪杂交方案中方差分量估计的偏差。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Nov 1;99(11). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab293.
3
Impact of inclusion rates of crossbred phenotypes and genotypes in nucleus selection programs.杂交表型和基因型纳入核选种计划的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Dec 1;98(12). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa360.
4
Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.将未基因型化的 F1 母本估计值导入杂种猪选育计划以提高遗传增益。
J Anim Sci. 2022 May 1;100(5). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac148.
5
Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.利用商业杂交群体数据进行猪的基因组预测:杜洛克×(长白猪×约克夏猪)三交杂种繁育体系的见解。
Genet Sel Evol. 2023 Mar 28;55(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00794-2.
6
Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.利用低密度杂交基因型来抵消杂交表型及其对纯种预测的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Dec 1;100(12). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac359.
7
Genetic parameters and purebred-crossbred genetic correlations for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in pigs.猪的生长、肉质和胴体性状的遗传参数和纯繁杂交遗传相关。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Dec 1;98(12). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa379.
8
Genetic correlations between feed efficiency traits, and growth performance and carcass traits in purebred and crossbred pigs.纯种猪和杂交猪的饲料效率性状与生长性能和胴体性状之间的遗传相关性。
J Anim Sci. 2018 Apr 3;96(3):817-829. doi: 10.1093/jas/skx011.
9
Design of reference populations for genomic selection in crossbreeding programs.杂交育种计划中基因组选择参考群体的设计
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Mar 7;47(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0104-x.
10
Purebred-crossbred genetic parameters for reproductive traits in swine.猪繁殖性状的纯种-杂交遗传参数。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Oct 1;99(10). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab270.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.利用商业杂交群体数据进行猪的基因组预测:杜洛克×(长白猪×约克夏猪)三交杂种繁育体系的见解。
Genet Sel Evol. 2023 Mar 28;55(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00794-2.
2
Bias in variance component estimation in swine crossbreeding schemes using selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies.利用选择性基因分型和表型策略的猪杂交方案中方差分量估计的偏差。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Nov 1;99(11). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab293.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of inclusion rates of crossbred phenotypes and genotypes in nucleus selection programs.杂交表型和基因型纳入核选种计划的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Dec 1;98(12). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa360.
2
Phenotypically Selective Genotyping Realizes More Genetic Gains in a Rainbow Trout Breeding Program in the Presence of Genotype-by-Environment Interactions.在存在基因型与环境互作的情况下,表型选择基因分型在虹鳟育种计划中实现了更多的遗传进展。
Front Genet. 2020 Sep 11;11:866. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00866. eCollection 2020.
3
Effect of genomic selection and genotyping strategy on estimation of variance components in animal models using different relationship matrices.基因组选择和基因型策略对使用不同关系矩阵的动物模型中方差分量估计的影响。
Genet Sel Evol. 2020 Jun 11;52(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00550-w.
4
A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.具有加性、显性和近交衰退效应的 sire 系和三元杂交猪的双变量基因组模型。
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Aug 19;51(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0486-2.
5
Validation of genomic predictions for body weight in broilers using crossbred information and considering breed-of-origin of alleles.利用杂交信息和考虑等位基因的起源品种验证肉鸡体重的基因组预测。
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Jul 8;51(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0481-7.
6
Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction.选择和选择性基因分型对参考群体的影响对基因组预测的偏差和准确性的影响。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2019 Sep;136(5):390-407. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12420. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.利用单步基因组 BLUP 和算法对不同来源数据的已验证和年轻杂种进行评估 1。
J Anim Sci. 2019 Apr 3;97(4):1513-1522. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz042.
8
The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.利用一步法基因组最佳线性无偏预测进行选择时,选择性基因分型对反应的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2018 Nov 21;96(11):4532-4542. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky330.
9
BOARD INVITED REVIEW: The purebred-crossbred correlation in pigs: A review of theory, estimates, and implications.特邀综述:猪的纯种-杂种相关性:理论、估计及影响的综述
J Anim Sci. 2017 Aug;95(8):3467-3478. doi: 10.2527/jas.2017.1669.
10
Accuracy of genomic prediction of purebreds for cross bred performance in pigs.猪纯种基因组预测对杂种性能的准确性。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2016 Dec;133(6):443-451. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12214. Epub 2016 Apr 17.

猪育种中杂交后代的选择性基因分型和表型数据纳入策略,用于杂交和纯种选择的联合应用。

Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2021 Mar 1;99(3). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab041.

DOI:10.1093/jas/skab041
PMID:33560334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7968076/
Abstract

Inclusion of crossbred (CB) data into traditionally purebred (PB) genetic evaluations has been shown to increase the response in CB performance. Currently, it is unrealistic to collect data on all CB animals in swine production systems, thus, a subset of CB animals must be selected to contribute genomic/phenotypic information. The aim of this study was to evaluate selective genotyping strategies in a simulated 3-way swine crossbreeding scheme. The swine crossbreeding scheme was simulated and produced 3-way CB animals for 6 generations with 3 distinct PB breeds each with 25 and 175 mating males and females, respectively. F1 crosses (400 mating females) produced 4,000 terminal CB progeny which were subjected to selective genotyping. The genome consisted of 18 chromosomes with 1,800 QTL and 72k SNP markers. Selection was performed using estimated breeding values (EBV) for CB performance. It was assumed that both PB and CB performance was moderately heritable (h2=0.4). Several scenarios altering the genetic correlation between PB and CB performance (rpc=0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7,or 0.9) were considered. CB animals were chosen based on phenotypes to select 200, 400, or 800 CB animals to genotype per generation. Selection strategies included: (1) Random: random selection, (2) Top: highest phenotype, (3) Bottom: lowest phenotype, (4) Extreme: half highest and half lowest phenotypes, and (5) Middle: average phenotype. Each selective genotyping strategy, except for Random, was considered by selecting animals in half-sib (HS) or full-sib (FS) families. The number of PB animals with genotypes and phenotypes each generation was fixed at 1,680. Each unique genotyping strategy and rpc scenario was replicated 10 times. Selection of CB animals based on the Extreme strategy resulted in the highest (P < 0.05) rates of genetic gain in CB performance (ΔG) when rpc<0.9. For highly correlated traits (rpc=0.9) selective genotyping did not impact (P > 0.05) ΔG. No differences (P > 0.05) were observed in ΔG between top, bottom, or middle when rpc>0.1. Higher correlations between true breeding values (TBV) and EBV were observed using Extreme when rpc<0.9. In general, family sampling method did not impact ΔG or the correlation between TBV and EBV. Overall, the Extreme genotyping strategy produced the greatest genetic gain and the highest correlations between TBV and EBV, suggesting that 2-tailed sampling of CB animals is the most informative when CB performance is the selection goal.

摘要

将杂交(CB)数据纳入传统的纯种(PB)遗传评估中已被证明可以提高 CB 性能的反应。目前,在猪生产系统中收集所有 CB 动物的数据是不现实的,因此,必须选择一组 CB 动物来提供基因组/表型信息。本研究的目的是在模拟的 3 向猪杂交方案中评估选择性基因分型策略。模拟了猪杂交方案,并产生了 6 代 3 向 CB 动物,每个方案都有 3 个不同的 PB 品种,每个品种有 25 个和 175 个交配雄性和雌性。F1 杂交(400 个交配雌性)产生了 4000 个终端 CB 后代,对其进行了选择性基因分型。基因组由 18 条染色体组成,包含 1800 个 QTL 和 72k SNP 标记。选择是基于 CB 性能的估计育种值(EBV)进行的。假设 PB 和 CB 性能的遗传力都适中(h2=0.4)。考虑了改变 PB 和 CB 性能之间遗传相关性(rpc=0.1、0.3、0.5、0.7 或 0.9)的几种情况。根据表型选择 CB 动物,每代选择 200、400 或 800 个 CB 动物进行基因分型。选择策略包括:(1)随机:随机选择,(2)最高:最高表型,(3)最低:最低表型,(4)极端:最高和最低表型的一半,和(5)中间:平均表型。除了随机选择外,每种选择性基因分型策略都通过选择半同胞(HS)或全同胞(FS)家族中的动物来考虑。每一代具有基因型和表型的 PB 动物的数量固定在 1680 个。每个独特的基因分型策略和 rpc 方案都复制了 10 次。当 rpc<0.9 时,基于极端策略选择 CB 动物导致 CB 性能的遗传增益(ΔG)最高(P<0.05)。对于高度相关的性状(rpc=0.9),选择性基因分型对(P>0.05)ΔG 没有影响。当 rpc>0.1 时,在 top、bottom 或 middle 之间没有观察到(P>0.05)ΔG 的差异。当 rpc<0.9 时,使用极端法观察到真实育种值(TBV)和 EBV 之间的相关性更高。一般来说,家族抽样方法对ΔG 或 TBV 和 EBV 之间的相关性没有影响。总体而言,极端基因分型策略产生了最大的遗传增益和 TBV 和 EBV 之间的最高相关性,表明当 CB 性能是选择目标时,CB 动物的 2 尾抽样是最具信息量的。