Suppr超能文献

纯种猪和杂交猪的饲料效率性状与生长性能和胴体性状之间的遗传相关性。

Genetic correlations between feed efficiency traits, and growth performance and carcass traits in purebred and crossbred pigs.

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.

Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2018 Apr 3;96(3):817-829. doi: 10.1093/jas/skx011.

Abstract

Selection for feed efficiency (FE) is a strategy to reduce the production costs per unit of animal product, which is one of the major objectives of current animal breeding programs. In pig breeding, selection for FE and other traits traditionally takes place based on purebred pig (PB) performance at the nucleus level, while pork production typically makes use of crossbred animals (CB). The success of this selection, therefore, depends on the genetic correlation between the performance of PB and CB (rpc) and on the genetic correlation (rg) between FE and the other traits that are currently under selection. Different traits are being used to account for FE, but the rpc has been reported only for feed conversion rate. Therefore, this study aimed 1) to estimate the rpc for growth performance, carcass, and FE traits; 2) to estimate rg between traits within PB and CB populations; and 3) to compare three different traits representing FE: feed conversion rate, residual energy intake (REI), and residual feed intake (RFI). Phenotypes of 194,445 PB animals from 23 nucleus farms, and 46,328 CB animals from three farms where research is conducted under near commercial production conditions were available for this study. From these, 22,984 PB and 8,657 CB presented records for feed intake. The PB population consisted of five sire and four dam lines, and the CB population consisted of terminal cross-progeny generated by crossing sires from one of the five PB sire lines with commercially available two-way maternal sow crosses. Estimates of rpc ranged from 0.61 to 0.71 for growth performance traits, from 0.75 to 0.82 for carcass traits, and from 0.62 to 0.67 for FE traits. Estimates of rg between growth performance, carcass, and FE traits differed within PB and CB. REI and RFI showed substantial positive rg estimates in PB (0.84) and CB (0.90) populations. The magnitudes of rpc estimates indicate that genetic progress is being realized in CB at the production level from selection on PB performance at nucleus level. However, including CB phenotypes recorded on production farms, when predicting breeding values, has the potential to increase genetic progress for these traits in CB. Given the genetic correlations with growth performance traits and the genetic correlation between the performance of PB and CB, REI is an attractive FE parameter for a breeding program.

摘要

选择饲料效率(FE)是降低单位动物产品生产成本的一种策略,这是当前动物育种计划的主要目标之一。在猪的育种中,FE 和其他性状的选择传统上基于核心群中纯种猪(PB)的表现,而猪肉生产通常利用杂交动物(CB)。因此,这种选择的成功取决于 PB 和 CB 表现之间的遗传相关系数(rpc)以及当前正在选择的 FE 与其他性状之间的遗传相关系数(rg)。不同的性状被用来解释 FE,但仅报道了饲料转化率的 rpc。因此,本研究旨在:1)估计生长性能、胴体和 FE 性状的 rpc;2)估计 PB 和 CB 群体内性状之间的 rg;3)比较代表 FE 的三种不同性状:饲料转化率、剩余能量摄入(REI)和剩余饲料摄入(RFI)。本研究使用了 23 个核心农场的 194445 头 PB 动物和 3 个研究在接近商业生产条件下的 CB 动物的表型数据。其中,22984 头 PB 和 8657 头 CB 有饲料摄入量记录。PB 群体由 5 个父本系和 4 个母本系组成,CB 群体由一个 PB 父本系的父本与市售的两种母猪杂交所产生的终端杂交后代组成。生长性能性状的 rpc 估计值在 0.61 到 0.71 之间,胴体性状的 rpc 估计值在 0.75 到 0.82 之间,FE 性状的 rpc 估计值在 0.62 到 0.67 之间。PB 和 CB 内部生长性能、胴体和 FE 性状之间的 rg 估计值不同。REI 和 RFI 在 PB(0.84)和 CB(0.90)群体中显示出显著的正 rg 估计值。rpc 估计值的大小表明,从核心群 PB 性能选择到生产水平 CB 的遗传进展正在实现。然而,在预测育种值时,包括在生产农场记录的 CB 表型,有可能增加 CB 中这些性状的遗传进展。考虑到与生长性能性状的遗传相关性以及 PB 和 CB 表现之间的遗传相关性,REI 是一个有吸引力的育种计划的 FE 参数。

相似文献

4
Purebred-crossbred genetic parameters for reproductive traits in swine.
J Anim Sci. 2021 Oct 1;99(10). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab270.
5
Genotype by feed interaction for feed efficiency and growth performance traits in pigs.
J Anim Sci. 2018 Sep 29;96(10):4125-4135. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky304.
10
Relationship between feed efficiency and slaughter traits of French Charolais bulls.
J Anim Sci. 2019 May 30;97(6):2308-2319. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz108.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple-trait genomic prediction for swine meat quality traits using gut microbiome features as a correlated trait.
J Anim Breed Genet. 2025 Jan;142(1):102-117. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12887. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
4
Genome-wide association study for loin muscle area of commercial crossbred pigs.
Anim Biosci. 2023 Jun;36(6):861-868. doi: 10.5713/ab.22.0407. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
5
Application of Genetic, Genomic and Biological Pathways in Improvement of Swine Feed Efficiency.
Front Genet. 2022 Jun 9;13:903733. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.903733. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparison of cecal microbiota composition in hybrid pigs from two separate three-way crosses.
Anim Biosci. 2021 Jul;34(7):1202-1209. doi: 10.5713/ab.20.0681. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

本文引用的文献

2
Review: divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.
Animal. 2017 Sep;11(9):1427-1439. doi: 10.1017/S175173111600286X. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
3
Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Apr 7;48:32. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0211-3.
4
Genetic correlations between lactation performance and growing-finishing traits in pigs.
J Anim Sci. 2013 Aug;91(8):3601-11. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-6200. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
6
The contribution of social effects to heritable variation in finishing traits of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa).
Genetics. 2008 Mar;178(3):1559-70. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.084236. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
7
Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine.
J Anim Sci. 2008 Feb;86(2):287-98. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0396. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
9
Multilevel selection 2: Estimating the genetic parameters determining inheritance and response to selection.
Genetics. 2007 Jan;175(1):289-99. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.062729. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
10
D. S. Falconer and Introduction to quantitative genetics.
Genetics. 2004 Aug;167(4):1529-36. doi: 10.1093/genetics/167.4.1529.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验