Suppr超能文献

大流行再现与 1918 年流感大流行期间密歇根州四次超额死亡高峰:对 COVID-19 的启示。

Pandemic Reemergence and Four Waves of Excess Mortality Coinciding With the 1918 Influenza Pandemic in Michigan: Insights for COVID-19.

机构信息

Siddharth Chandra is with the Asian Studies Center, James Madison College, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (by courtesy), Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. Julia Christensen is with James Madison College, Michigan State University. Madhur Chandra is with the Ingham County Health Department, Lansing, MI, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University. Nigel Paneth is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Pediatrics, Michigan State University.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2021 Mar;111(3):430-437. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305969.

Abstract

The global influenza pandemic that emerged in 1918 has become the event of reference for a broad spectrum of policymakers seeking to learn from the past. This article sheds light on multiple waves of excess mortality that occurred in the US state of Michigan at the time with insights into how epidemics might evolve and propagate across space and time. We analyzed original monthly data on all-cause deaths by county for the 83 counties of Michigan and interpreted the results in the context of what is known about the pandemic. Counties in Michigan experienced up to four waves of excess mortality over a span of two years, including a severe one in early 1920. Some counties experienced two waves in late 1918 while others had only one. The 1920 wave propagated across the state in a different manner than the fall and winter 1918 waves. The twin waves in late 1918 were likely related to the timing of the statewide imposition of a three-week social distancing order. Michigan's experience holds sobering lessons for those who wish to understand how immunologically naïve populations encounter novel viral pathogens.

摘要

1918 年爆发的全球流感大流行已成为众多政策制定者的参考事件,他们试图从过去的经验中吸取教训。本文通过分析当时美国密歇根州发生的多波超额死亡事件,深入了解了传染病如何在空间和时间上演变和传播。我们分析了密歇根州 83 个县的全因死亡的原始月度数据,并根据对大流行的了解解释了结果。密歇根州的各县在两年的时间内经历了多达四轮的超额死亡,其中包括 2020 年初的一轮严重疫情。一些县在 1918 年末经历了两波疫情,而其他县只经历了一波。2020 年的疫情波与 1918 年秋季和冬季的疫情波在传播方式上有所不同。1918 年末的两波疫情可能与全州范围内实施为期三周的社会隔离令的时间有关。密歇根州的经验为那些希望了解免疫幼稚人群如何遇到新型病毒病原体的人提供了深刻的教训。

相似文献

3
The COVID-19 Pandemic in Historical Perspective: An Dossier.历史视角下的新冠疫情:一份档案
Am J Public Health. 2021 Mar;111(3):402-404. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306136.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
The 1918-1920 influenza pandemic in Peru.秘鲁 1918-1920 年流感大流行。
Vaccine. 2011 Jul 22;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):B21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.02.048.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验