Andrés-Roqueta Clara, Garcia-Molina Irene, Flores-Buils Raquel
Department of Developmental, Educational, Social and Methodological Psychology, Universitat Jaume I de Castelló, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.
Children (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;8(2):123. doi: 10.3390/children8020123.
(1) Background: Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is diagnosed when the child experiences problems in language with no known underlying biomedical condition and the information required for its correct evaluation must be obtained from different contexts. The Children's Communication Checklist (CCC-2) covers aspects of a child's communication related to structural language and pragmatic skills, which are linked to social cognition or executive functions. The aim of this article is to examine parents' reports using the Spanish version of the CCC-2 questionnaire and its association with different formal assessments related to communication. (2) Methods: 30 children with DLD (3; 10-9 years old) and 39 age-matched (AM) children with typical development were assessed using formal measures of structural language, pragmatics, social cognition, and executive functions. Parents of children with DLD answered the Spanish version of the CCC-2. (3) Results: The performance of children with DLD was lower in all the formal assessments in comparison to AM children. The CCC-2 was significantly correlated with all the direct child assessments, although only formal measures of structural language predicted both the structural language and pragmatics scales of the CCC-2. (4) Conclusions: The CCC-2 answered by parents was consistent with formal assessments in children with DLD, and structural language seemed to be the best predictor of all the subscales.
(1) 背景:当儿童在语言方面存在问题且无已知潜在生物医学状况时,会被诊断为发育性语言障碍(DLD),而对其进行正确评估所需的信息必须从不同情境中获取。儿童沟通检查表(CCC - 2)涵盖了与儿童沟通相关的结构语言和语用技能方面,这些与社会认知或执行功能相关。本文旨在研究使用西班牙语版CCC - 2问卷的家长报告及其与不同沟通相关正式评估之间的关联。(2) 方法:使用结构语言、语用学、社会认知和执行功能的正式测量方法,对30名患有DLD的儿童(3岁10个月至9岁)和39名年龄匹配(AM)的发育正常儿童进行评估。患有DLD的儿童的家长回答西班牙语版的CCC - 2。(3) 结果:与AM儿童相比,患有DLD的儿童在所有正式评估中的表现都较差。CCC - 2与所有直接儿童评估均显著相关,尽管只有结构语言的正式测量方法能预测CCC - 2的结构语言和语用学量表。(4) 结论:家长回答的CCC - 2与患有DLD儿童的正式评估结果一致,并且结构语言似乎是所有子量表的最佳预测指标。