• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[《儿童沟通检查表》的西班牙语改编版可识别语言语用障碍,并区分临床亚型]。

[The Spanish adapted version of the Children's Communication Checklist identifies disorders of pragmatic use of language and differentiates between clinical subtypes].

作者信息

Crespo-Eguilaz N, Magallon S, Sanchez-Carpintero R, Narbona J

机构信息

Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Espana.

出版信息

Rev Neurol. 2016;62 Suppl 1:S49-57.

PMID:26922959
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Children's Communication Checklist (CCC) by Bishop is a useful scale for evaluation of pragmatic verbal abilities in school children. The aim of the study is to ascertain the validity and reliability of the CCC in Spanish.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Answers to the CCC items by parents of 360 children with normal intelligence were analyzed. There were five groups: 160 control children; 68 children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, 77 with procedural non-verbal disorder, 25 children with social communication disorder and 30 with autism spectrum disorder. Investigations included: factorial analysis in order to cluster checklist items, reliability analyses of the proposed scales and discriminant analysis to check whether the scale correctly classifies children with pragmatic verbal abilities.

RESULTS

Seven factors were obtained (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin: 0.852) with moderate similarity with those of the original scale: social relationships, interests, and five more that can be grouped into pragmatic verbal ability (conversational abilities, coherence-comprehension, empathy nonverbal communication and appropriateness). All factors are significantly correlated with each other in the control group, and the five that compose pragmatic verbal ability correlate with each other in the clinical groups (Pearson r). The scales have good reliability (Cronbach's alpha: 0.914). The questionnaire correctly classifies 98.9% of grouped cases with and without pragmatic disorder and 78% of subjects in their appropriate clinical group. Besides, the questionnaire allows to differentiate the pathologies according to the presence and intensity of the symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This Spanish version of the CCC is highly valid and reliable. The proposed statistics can be used as normative-reference values.

摘要

引言

毕晓普编制的《儿童沟通检查表》(CCC)是评估学龄儿童语用语言能力的有效量表。本研究旨在确定CCC西班牙语版的有效性和可靠性。

对象与方法

分析了360名智力正常儿童的家长对CCC项目的回答。分为五组:160名对照儿童;68名患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的儿童,77名患有程序性非语言障碍的儿童,25名患有社交沟通障碍的儿童和30名患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童。调查包括:因子分析以对检查表项目进行聚类,对所提议量表的可靠性分析以及判别分析,以检查该量表是否能正确对具有语用语言能力的儿童进行分类。

结果

获得了七个因子(凯泽 - 迈耶 - 奥尔金值:0.852),与原始量表的因子有适度相似性:社会关系、兴趣,以及另外五个可归为语用语言能力的因子(对话能力、连贯理解、共情、非语言沟通和恰当性)。在对照组中,所有因子彼此显著相关,在临床组中,构成语用语言能力的五个因子彼此相关(皮尔逊r)。这些量表具有良好的可靠性(克朗巴哈α系数:0.914)。该问卷能正确分类98.9%的有或无语用障碍的分组病例,以及78%处于相应临床组的受试者。此外,该问卷能够根据症状的存在和严重程度区分不同病症。

结论

CCC的这个西班牙语版本具有高度的有效性和可靠性。所提议的统计数据可作为规范参考值。

相似文献

1
[The Spanish adapted version of the Children's Communication Checklist identifies disorders of pragmatic use of language and differentiates between clinical subtypes].[《儿童沟通检查表》的西班牙语改编版可识别语言语用障碍,并区分临床亚型]。
Rev Neurol. 2016;62 Suppl 1:S49-57.
2
Language and pragmatic profile in children with ADHD measured by Children's Communication Checklist 2nd edition.使用《儿童沟通检查表》第二版测量多动症儿童的语言和语用特征。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2014 Dec;39(4):179-87. doi: 10.3109/14015439.2013.784802. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
3
Use of the Children's Communication Checklist-2 for classification of language impairment risk in young school-age children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.使用儿童沟通检查表-2 对有注意缺陷/多动障碍的学龄期儿童进行语言障碍风险分类。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Feb;23(1):73-83. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0164).
4
Pragmatics fragmented: the factor structure of the Dutch children's communication checklist (CCC).语用学的碎片化:荷兰儿童沟通检查表(CCC)的因子结构。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009 Sep-Oct;44(5):549-74. doi: 10.1080/13682820802243344.
5
Children's Communication Checklist (CCC) scores in 11-year-old children with communication impairments.11岁有沟通障碍儿童的儿童沟通检查表(CCC)评分
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2004 Apr-Jun;39(2):215-27. doi: 10.1080/13682820310001617001.
6
Translation and validation of the Children's Communication Checklist to evaluate pragmatic language impairment in Thai children.用于评估泰国儿童语用语言障碍的儿童沟通检查表的翻译与验证
Pediatr Int. 2014 Feb;56(1):31-4. doi: 10.1111/ped.12216.
7
Measuring pragmatic language in speakers with autism spectrum disorders: Comparing the children's communication checklist--2 and the test of pragmatic language.测量自闭症谱系障碍患者的语用能力:比较儿童沟通检查表-2 和语用语言测试。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 Aug;19(3):204-12. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0011). Epub 2010 Mar 10.
8
The Revised Children's Communication Checklist-2 (CCC-R): Factor Structure and Psychometric Evaluation.《修订版儿童沟通检查表-2(CCC-R)》:因子结构与心理计量评估。
Autism Res. 2021 Apr;14(4):759-772. doi: 10.1002/aur.2467. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
9
Can the Children's Communication Checklist differentiate between children with autism, children with ADHD, and normal controls?儿童沟通检查表能否区分自闭症儿童、多动症儿童和正常对照组?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;45(8):1437-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00850.x.
10
Parent and teacher report of pragmatic aspects of communication: use of the children's communication checklist in a clinical setting.家长和教师对沟通语用方面的报告:在临床环境中使用儿童沟通检查表
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001 Dec;43(12):809-18. doi: 10.1017/s0012162201001475.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain oscillatory activity evoked by chirp modulated tones in healthy children.健康儿童中啁啾调制音调诱发的脑振荡活动
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 23;10(24):e40599. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40599. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.
2
Protocol for the assessment of the development of pragmatic competencies in early childhood (PDP-PI).幼儿语用能力发展评估方案(PDP-PI)
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1368321. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1368321. eCollection 2024.
3
Development and validation of the Arabic children's strong communication scale: a pilot study.
阿拉伯儿童强大沟通量表的开发与验证:一项试点研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 27;15:1380296. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1380296. eCollection 2024.
4
Psychometric Features of the Arabic Version of the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC2).儿童沟通检查表(CCC2)阿拉伯语版本的心理测量特征。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jul 9;17:3247-3264. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S462462. eCollection 2024.
5
The Influence of ASD Severity on Parental Overload: The Moderating Role of Parental Well-Being and the ASD Pragmatic Level.孤独症谱系障碍严重程度对父母负担的影响:父母幸福感和孤独症谱系障碍语用水平的调节作用。
Children (Basel). 2022 May 24;9(6):769. doi: 10.3390/children9060769.
6
Capacity of the CCC-2 to Discriminate ASD from Other Neurodevelopmental Disorders.CCC-2区分自闭症谱系障碍与其他神经发育障碍的能力。
Children (Basel). 2021 Jul 27;8(8):640. doi: 10.3390/children8080640.
7
Association between CCC-2 and Structural Language, Pragmatics, Social Cognition, and Executive Functions in Children with Developmental Language Disorder.发育性语言障碍儿童中CCC-2与结构语言、语用学、社会认知及执行功能之间的关联
Children (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;8(2):123. doi: 10.3390/children8020123.
8
EDUTEA: A DSM-5 teacher screening questionnaire for autism spectrum disorder and social pragmatic communication disorder.EDUTEA:一份用于自闭症谱系障碍和社会语用沟通障碍的DSM-5教师筛查问卷。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2017 Sep-Dec;17(3):269-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 23.