Suppr超能文献

基于过氧乙酸的消毒剂是现场环境中对响应者和医护人员进行生物去污程序的最合适解决方案。

Peracetic acid-based disinfectant is the most appropriate solution for a biological decontamination procedure of responders and healthcare workers in the field environment.

机构信息

Department of Biological Defense, Military Health Institute, Armed Forces, Techonin, Czech Republic.

Population Protection Institute of Fire and Rescue Services, Lazne Bohdanec, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Appl Microbiol. 2021 Sep;131(3):1240-1248. doi: 10.1111/jam.15041. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

Abstract

AIMS

An effective decontamination procedure of personnel wearing personal protective equipment is required by CBRN responders and healthcare workers when dealing with biological warfare agents or natural outbreaks caused by highly contagious pathogens. This study aimed to identify critical factors affecting the efficacy of peracetic acid (PAA)-based disinfectants and products containing either hydrogen peroxide or sodium hypochlorite under the same conditions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The influence of concentration, application (contact) time, erroneous human behaviour, interfering substance, technical assets and weather conditions on disinfection efficacy against Bacillus subtilis spores were assessed in 14 experimental groups. Residual contamination of protective suits was measured to provide responders with readily understandable information (up to 100 colony forming units classified a suit as disinfected). Weather conditions, short application time and erroneous human behaviour substantially affected the effectiveness of PAAs (P < 0·05). Non-PAA-based disinfectants (either liquid or foam) did not reach comparable efficacy (P < 0·001).

CONCLUSIONS

Peracetic acid was effective at a concentration of 6400-8200 ppm and an application time of 4 min.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

The study provides operationally relevant data for the use of PAA-based disinfectants in preparedness planning and management of biological incidents and natural outbreaks.

摘要

目的

当处理生物战剂或由高传染性病原体引起的自然爆发时,CBRN 响应人员和医护人员需要对穿着个人防护装备的人员进行有效的消毒程序。本研究旨在确定在相同条件下,过氧乙酸(PAA)基消毒剂和含有过氧化氢或次氯酸钠的产品的关键因素对消毒效果的影响。

方法和结果

在 14 个实验组中评估了浓度、应用(接触)时间、人为错误行为、干扰物质、技术资产和天气条件对枯草芽孢杆菌孢子消毒效果的影响。测量防护服的残留污染,为响应人员提供易于理解的信息(最高可达 100 个菌落形成单位,将防护服分类为消毒)。天气条件、短应用时间和人为错误行为大大影响了 PAA 的有效性(P<0.05)。非 PAA 基消毒剂(液体或泡沫)无法达到可比的效果(P<0.001)。

结论

过氧乙酸在 6400-8200ppm 的浓度和 4 分钟的应用时间下有效。

研究的意义和影响

本研究为在生物事件和自然爆发的准备计划和管理中使用 PAA 基消毒剂提供了可操作的相关数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/306c/8451822/4bde4874ebf1/JAM-131-1240-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Decontamination of Personal Protective Equipment.
Health Secur. 2019 May/Jun;17(3):200-212. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0005. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
4
[Aerosol disinfection of bacterial spores].
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med. 1987 Jun;184(3-4):229-52.
6
Evaluation of peracetic acid fog for the inactivation of Bacillus anthracis spore surrogates in a large decontamination chamber.
J Hazard Mater. 2013 Apr 15;250-251:61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.01.068. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
7
Inactivation kinetics of Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores by a peracetic acid or hydrogen peroxide fog in comparison to the liquid form.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2020 Mar 2;316:108418. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108418. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
8
Scalable in-hospital decontamination of N95 filtering face-piece respirator with a peracetic acid room disinfection system.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;42(6):678-687. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.1257. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
10
Effectiveness of foam disinfectants in reducing sink-drain gram-negative bacterial colonization.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Mar;41(3):280-285. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.325. Epub 2019 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Peracetic acid effects on human bronchial cells in an air liquid interface.
PLoS One. 2025 May 5;20(5):e0322926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322926. eCollection 2025.
4
Effect of disinfectants and manual wiping for processing the cell product changeover in a biosafety cabinet.
Regen Ther. 2023 Feb 9;22:169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2023.01.009. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Direct Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein by Peracetic Acid.
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 20;24(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010020.
6
Evaluation of calcium hydroxide, calcium hypochlorite, peracetic acid, and potassium bicarbonate as citrus fruit sanitizers.
J Food Sci Technol. 2022 May;59(5):1739-1747. doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-05185-3. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
7
Is Peracetic Acid Fumigation Effective in Public Transportation?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 22;19(5):2526. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052526.

本文引用的文献

2
Risk of self-contamination during doffing of personal protective equipment.
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Dec;46(12):1329-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
3
Use of personal protective equipment among health care personnel: Results of clinical observations and simulations.
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Jan 1;45(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.011.
4
Personal protective equipment for the Ebola virus disease: A comparison of 2 training programs.
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Dec 1;43(12):1281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
5
Risks to healthcare workers with emerging diseases: lessons from MERS-CoV, Ebola, SARS, and avian flu.
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2015 Aug;28(4):349-61. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000183.
7
Laboratory evaluation of large-scale decontamination approaches.
J Appl Microbiol. 2012 May;112(5):874-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05259.x. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
9
Recovery efficiency and limit of detection of aerosolized Bacillus anthracis Sterne from environmental surface samples.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jul;75(13):4297-306. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02549-08. Epub 2009 May 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验