Suppr超能文献

2014 - 2018年美国医疗保险按服务收费计划中低价值医疗服务使用及支出趋势

Trends in Low-Value Health Service Use and Spending in the US Medicare Fee-for-Service Program, 2014-2018.

作者信息

Mafi John N, Reid Rachel O, Baseman Lesley H, Hickey Scot, Totten Mark, Agniel Denis, Fendrick A Mark, Sarkisian Catherine, Damberg Cheryl L

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.

RAND Health Care, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037328. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37328.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Low-value care, defined as care offering no net benefit in specific clinical scenarios, is associated with harmful outcomes in patients and wasteful spending. Despite a national education campaign and increasing attention on reducing health care waste, recent trends in low-value care delivery remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess national trends in low-value care use and spending.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional study, analyses of low-value care use and spending from 2014 to 2018 were conducted using 100% Medicare fee-for-service enrollment and claims data. Included individuals were aged 65 years or older and continuously enrolled in Medicare parts A, B, and D during each measurement year and the previous year. Data were analyzed from September 2019 through December 2020.

EXPOSURE

Being enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare for a period of time, in years.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The Milliman MedInsight Health Waste Calculator was used to assess 32 claims-based measures of low-value care associated with Choosing Wisely recommendations and other professional guidelines. The calculator designates services as wasteful, likely wasteful, or not wasteful based on an absence of indication of appropriate use in the claims history; calculator-designated wasteful services were defined as low-value care. Spending was calculated as claim-line level (ie, spending on the low-value service) and claim level (ie, spending on the low-value service plus associated services), adjusting for inflation.

RESULTS

Among 21 045 759 individuals with fee-for-service Medicare (mean [SD] age, 77.4 [7.9] years; 12 515 915 [59.5%] women), the percentage receiving any of 32 low-value services decreased from 36.3% (95% CI, 36.3%-36.4%) to 33.6% (95% CI, 33.6%-33.6%) from 2014 to 2018. Uses of low-value services per 1000 individuals decreased from 677.8 (95% CI, 676.2-679.5) to 632.7 (95% CI, 632.6-632.8) from 2014 to 2018. Three services comprised approximately two-thirds of uses among 32 low-value services per 1000 individuals: preoperative laboratory testing decreased from 213.8 (95% CI, 213.4-214.2) to 166.2 (95% CI, 166.2-166.2), while opioids for back pain increased from 154.4 (95% CI, 153.6-155.2) to 182.1 (95% CI, 182.1-182.1) and antibiotics for upper respiratory infections increased from 75.0 (95% CI, 75.0-75.1) to 82 (95% CI, 82.0-82.0). Spending per 1000 individuals on low-value care also decreased, from $52 765.5 (95% CI, $51 952.3-$53 578.6) to $46 921.7 (95% CI, $46 593.7-$47 249.7) at the claim-line level and from $160 070.4 (95% CI, $158 999.8-$161 141.0) to $144 741.1 (95% CI, $144 287.5-$145 194.7) at the claim level.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study found that among individuals with fee-for-service Medicare receiving any of 32 measured services, low-value care use and spending decreased marginally from 2014 to 2018, despite a national education campaign in collaboration with clinician specialty societies and increased attention on low-value care. While most use of low-value care came from 3 services, 1 of these was opioid prescriptions, which increased over time despite the harms associated with their use. These findings may represent several opportunities to prevent patient harm and lower spending.

摘要

重要性

低价值医疗被定义为在特定临床场景中无净效益的医疗服务,与患者的有害后果和浪费性支出相关。尽管开展了全国性的教育活动,且对减少医疗保健浪费的关注度不断提高,但低价值医疗服务提供的近期趋势仍不明朗。

目的

评估低价值医疗服务使用和支出的全国趋势。

设计、设置和参与者:在这项横断面研究中,利用100%的医疗保险按服务收费参保和理赔数据,对2014年至2018年的低价值医疗服务使用和支出进行了分析。纳入的个体年龄在65岁及以上,在每个测量年份及前一年连续参保医疗保险A、B和D部分。数据于2019年9月至2020年12月进行分析。

暴露因素

按服务收费参加医疗保险的时长(以年计)。

主要结局和测量指标

使用Milliman MedInsight健康浪费计算器评估与明智选择建议及其他专业指南相关的32项基于理赔的低价值医疗服务指标。该计算器根据理赔记录中是否缺乏适当使用的指征,将服务指定为浪费性、可能浪费性或非浪费性;计算器指定的浪费性服务被定义为低价值医疗服务。支出计算为理赔行层面(即低价值服务的支出)和理赔层面(即低价值服务及相关服务的支出),并对通货膨胀进行了调整。

结果

在21045759名参加医疗保险按服务收费的个体中(平均[标准差]年龄为77.4[7.9]岁;12515915名[59.5%]为女性),接受32项低价值服务中任何一项的比例从2014年的36.3%(95%置信区间,36.3%-36.4%)降至2018年的33.6%(95%置信区间,33.6%-33.6%)。每1000人中低价值服务的使用量从2014年的677.8(95%置信区间,676.2-679.5)降至2018年的632.7(95%置信区间,632.6-632.8)。在每1000人中32项低价值服务的使用量中,三项服务约占三分之二:术前实验室检查从213.8(95%置信区间,213.4-214.2)降至166.2(95%置信区间,166.2-166.2),而用于背痛的阿片类药物从154.4(95%置信区间,153.6-155.2)增至182.1(95%置信区间,182.1-182.1),用于上呼吸道感染的抗生素从75.0(95%置信区间,75.0-75.1)增至82(95%置信区间,82.0-82.0)。每1000人中低价值医疗服务的支出在理赔行层面也从52765.5美元(95%置信区间,51952.3美元-53578.6美元)降至46921.7美元(95%置信区间,46593.7美元-47249.7美元),在理赔层面从160070.4美元(95%置信区间,158999.8美元-161141.0美元)降至144741.1美元(95%置信区间,144287.5美元-145194.7美元)。

结论与意义

这项横断面研究发现,在接受32项测量服务中任何一项的医疗保险按服务收费参保个体中,尽管与临床医生专业协会合作开展了全国性教育活动,且对低价值医疗服务的关注度有所提高,但2014年至2018年期间低价值医疗服务的使用和支出仍略有下降。虽然大部分低价值医疗服务的使用来自三项服务,但其中一项是阿片类药物处方,尽管其使用存在危害,但随着时间的推移仍有所增加。这些发现可能代表了预防患者伤害和降低支出的几个机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7491/7887655/d7509772da69/jamanetwopen-e2037328-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验