Sainsbury Wellcome Centre and Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Physiol Rev. 2021 Jul 1;101(3):1427-1456. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00014.2020. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
There are currently a number of theories of rodent hippocampal function. They fall into two major groups that differ in the role they impute to space in hippocampal information processing. On one hand, the cognitive map theory sees space as crucial and central, with other types of nonspatial information embedded in a primary spatial framework. On the other hand, most other theories see the function of the hippocampal formation as broader, treating all types of information as equivalent and concentrating on the processes carried out irrespective of the specific material being represented, stored, and manipulated. One crucial difference, therefore, is the extent to which theories see hippocampal pyramidal cells as representing nonspatial information independently of a spatial framework. Studies have reported the existence of single hippocampal unit responses to nonspatial stimuli, both to simple sensory inputs as well as to more complex stimuli such as objects, conspecifics, rewards, and time, and these findings been interpreted as evidence in favor of a broader hippocampal function. Alternatively, these nonspatial responses might actually be feature-in-place signals where the spatial nature of the response has been masked by the fact that the objects or features were only presented in one location or one spatial context. In this article, we argue that when tested in multiple locations, the hippocampal response to nonspatial stimuli is almost invariably dependent on the animal's location. Looked at collectively, the data provide strong support for the cognitive map theory.
目前有许多关于啮齿动物海马体功能的理论。它们分为两大主要类别,在赋予海马体信息处理中空间的作用方面存在差异。一方面,认知地图理论认为空间至关重要且处于核心地位,其他类型的非空间信息嵌入到主要的空间框架中。另一方面,大多数其他理论认为海马体的功能更为广泛,将所有类型的信息视为等同,并集中于无论所表示、存储和操作的具体材料如何都能执行的过程。因此,一个关键的区别是,理论认为海马体锥体细胞在多大程度上独立于空间框架来表示非空间信息。研究报告称,单个海马体单元对非空间刺激存在反应,无论是对简单的感觉输入,还是对更复杂的刺激,如物体、同种动物、奖励和时间,这些发现被解释为支持更广泛的海马体功能的证据。或者,这些非空间反应实际上可能是特征位置信号,其中反应的空间性质被掩盖了,因为物体或特征仅在一个位置或一个空间环境中呈现。在本文中,我们认为,当在多个位置进行测试时,海马体对非空间刺激的反应几乎总是取决于动物的位置。从整体上看,这些数据为认知地图理论提供了强有力的支持。