Suppr超能文献

围产期生存能力的边缘:理解荷兰的立场。

The Edge of Perinatal Viability: Understanding the Dutch Position.

作者信息

De Proost L, Verweij E J T, Ismaili M'hamdi H, Reiss I K M, Steegers E A P, Geurtzen R, Verhagen A A E

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Neonatology, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 1;9:634290. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.634290. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The current Dutch guideline on care at the edge of perinatal viability advises to consider initiation of active care to infants born from 24 weeks of gestational age on. This, only after extensive counseling of and shared decision-making with the parents of the yet unborn infant. Compared to most other European guidelines on this matter, the Dutch guideline may be thought to stand out for its relatively high age threshold of initiating active care, its gray zone spanning weeks 24 and 25 in which active management is determined by parental discretion, and a slight reluctance to provide active care in case of extreme prematurity. In this article, we explore the Dutch position more thoroughly. First, we briefly look at the previous and current Dutch guidelines. Second, we position them within the Dutch socio-cultural context. We focus on the Dutch prioritization of individual freedom, the abortion law and the perinatal threshold of viability, and a culturally embedded aversion of suffering. Lastly, we explore two possible adaptations of the Dutch guideline; i.e., to only lower the age threshold to consider the initiation of active care, or to change the type of guideline.

摘要

荷兰现行的围产期生存边缘护理指南建议,对于孕周24周及以上出生的婴儿,考虑开始积极护理。但这仅在对未出生婴儿的父母进行广泛咨询并共同决策之后。与大多数其他欧洲关于此事的指南相比,荷兰指南可能因其启动积极护理的年龄阈值相对较高、24周和25周这一灰色地带(在此期间积极管理由父母自行决定)以及在极端早产情况下对提供积极护理略有犹豫而显得突出。在本文中,我们将更深入地探讨荷兰的立场。首先,我们简要回顾一下荷兰以前和现行的指南。其次,我们将它们置于荷兰的社会文化背景中。我们关注荷兰对个人自由的优先重视、堕胎法和围产期生存阈值,以及文化中对痛苦的厌恶。最后我们探讨荷兰指南的两种可能调整;即,仅降低考虑启动积极护理的年龄阈值,或改变指南类型。

相似文献

1
The Edge of Perinatal Viability: Understanding the Dutch Position.围产期生存能力的边缘:理解荷兰的立场。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 1;9:634290. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.634290. eCollection 2021.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

7
Two-year neurodevelopmental outcome in children born extremely preterm: the EPI-DAF study.极早产儿 2 年神经发育结局:EPI-DAF 研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Sep;107(5):467-474. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323124. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival and causes of death in extremely preterm infants in the Netherlands.荷兰极早产儿的生存状况和死亡原因。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 May;106(3):251-257. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-318978. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
2
On the limits of viability: toward an individualized prognosis-based approach.论生存极限:迈向基于个体化预后的方法
J Perinatol. 2020 Dec;40(12):1736-1738. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00793-x. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
3
Perinatal management of extreme preterm birth before 27 weeks of gestation: a framework for practice.孕27周前极早早产的围产期管理:实践框架
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 May;105(3):232-239. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318402. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
4
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide of Persons With Dementia in the Netherlands.荷兰痴呆症患者的安乐死和协助自杀。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(4):466-477. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
9
Counselling and management for anticipated extremely preterm birth.预期极早早产的咨询与管理
Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Sep;22(6):334-341. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxx058. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
10
[The gestational age label].[孕周标签]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2017;161:D1600.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验