Suppr超能文献

干预性访谈:第三部分。打算提出线性、循环性、策略性还是反思性问题?

Interventive interviewing: Part III. Intending to ask lineal, circular, strategic, or reflexive questions?

作者信息

Tomm K

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Fam Process. 1988 Mar;27(1):1-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00001.x.

Abstract

Every question asked by a therapist may be seen to embody some intent and to arise from certain assumptions. Many questions are intended to orient the therapist to the client's situation and experiences; others are asked primarily to provoke therapeutic change. Some questions are based on lineal assumptions about the phenomena being addressed; others are based on circular assumptions. The differences among these questions are not trivial. They tend to have dissimilar effects. This article explores these issues and offers a framework for distinguishing four major groups of questions. The framework may be used by therapists to guide their decision making about what kinds of questions to ask, and by researchers to study different interviewing styles.

摘要

治疗师提出的每个问题都可以被视为体现了某种意图,并源于某些假设。许多问题旨在使治疗师了解来访者的情况和经历;其他问题主要是为了引发治疗性改变。一些问题基于对所探讨现象的线性假设;其他问题则基于循环假设。这些问题之间的差异并非微不足道。它们往往会产生不同的效果。本文探讨了这些问题,并提供了一个区分四大类问题的框架。治疗师可以使用这个框架来指导他们决定提出何种类型的问题,研究人员也可以用它来研究不同的访谈风格。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验